News

Mon 8 Sep, 10:16 am UTC

News archive

Are Dublin's free bikes a poor deal?

By Richard Peace

The agreement between Dublin city council and JC Decaux to set up the city’s first free public bike hire scheme has recently received heavy criticism. 

The deal sees JC Decaux given space for 72 advertising panels in the capital, with Dublin receiving 450 bikes and signage in return. Critics of the scheme include one of Ireland’s biggest advertising agencies and the Dublin City Business Association.   

The French company has already begun to erect their 72 advertising panels, but the positioning of the boards has been called into question, with some motorists declaring them unsafe. The council has also been criticised for granting permission for the signs, with dissenters suspicious they’re bad value for the number of bikes the city is receiving.

Stuart Fogarty, of AFA O’Meara, Ireland’s largest advertising agency, said of the scheme: “They will be the most expensive bicycles in the world. Those advertising sites are worth at least 100 million Euros and we are swapping them for a few hundred bicycles, a few advertising panels and some signage for tourists," he said. "There are too few bicycles to make any real impact on traffic, so what’s in it for Dublin?”

BikeRadar research shows Fogarty may have a point. Rough calculations show that the scheme will offer around one bike for every 1124 inhabitants - a stark contrast to Paris’s lauded Velib’ scheme, which has approximately one bike per 110 central city area residents. In addition, Paris’s deal saw the city get 12 bikes per billboard, but Dublin receives just six for every advertising space it allows.  

Members of Dublin city council have openly voiced their criticism. Andrew Montague, a Labour councillor and chairman of the Dublin Cycling Committee, compared their scheme unfavourably with Lyon - one of the cities visited by councilors when assessing potential schemes. “Their scheme started with 2,000 bikes and there are now 3,000, which is testament to its success,” he said. “It’s disappointing that we will begin with just 450. To have a real impact, it’s important to have a high density of bikes in the city - but at least it’s a start.”

The architectural community is unimpressed with the scheme as well. Archiseek, an architectural website, estimates that it would have cost €26,400 to object to all the planned billboards individually. It also estimates that about half of the planning objections lodged so far against the new billboards have fallen at the first hurdle.

The bikes are not yet available for use, but voice your comments below - is the city of Dublin being taken for a ride?

User Comments

There are 3 comments on this post

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 comments

  • Well that's approximately 4.5 bikes for every Dublin cyclist, so what's the problem? ;-)

    Seriously, if DCC genuinely wanted to encourage cycling, they would do something about the shockingly bad cycle lanes. These appear to have been designed to get cyclists out of the way of everyone else, regardless of the cyclist's journey objectives or personal safety, then surfaced with a mixture of builders' rubble and cheese. While they're at it, they should petition the Dail to suspend that crazy law which forces cyclists to use these lethal 'facilities'.

    Well we can but hope.

  • Luckily in UK we are not forced by the Highway Code to use cycle lanes. It only says that "it may make your journey safer". Of course it doesn't actually, so all the vehicular cyclists ignore them.

    The proper way to protect cyclists from errant motorvehicles is to make them fear us. Do you give police or Angels lip? No, because bad things may happen to you if you try. Likewise if some cyclists were actually under cover privatised traffic police then is the motorist going to hassle a cyclist to find out if it is a bluff? Any one overtakes a cyclist badly gets their £50 fine and 3 points in the post. Overtake badly on a double-white or zigzag and you get £100 and 6 points. At 10% commission I could be earning more than Lance Armstrong.

  • I would second Mateotu, very badly thought up they are to narrow, should be 7 -8ft like Amsterdam instead of 2 1/2 - 3ft like they are at present. I hate where it says Cyclists Dismount in order to give way to Cars should be the other way round. In certain Areas you have stupid Cycle Lanes that start at the intersections of Houseing Estates and then End 50 ft away. In Swords , Ridgeway Estate and Rivervally Estate are a case in point as are undoubtedly other Areas of the City and County of Dublin. If you went on every Cycle lane they put in you would be left waiting at Traffic Lights the way they are designed. On the Cycleway at Clontarf which is very good incidentally they have put in Poles on the Middle of it at the Car Park Intersection and it is very dangerous as you are likely to run into it. They are to warn you of the Lane for the Car Park but they are Dangerous, they could have put them at the side of the Lane.Would Motorists Tolerate Poles sticking up in the middle of the Road to warn them of an approaching Cycle Lane I think not.The same thing is at the James Larkin Road Intersection.

  • 1

Post comment:

You need to login or register to post comments.

Also on BikeRadar