News

Last Updated: Mon 7 Jul, 6:55 am BST

News archive

Call for tougher sentencing for dangerous drivers

By Rosee Woodland

Cyclists who’ve fallen victim to dangerous drivers are rallying behind calls for tougher road laws.

At the moment riders in the UK who are hit by cars often see the drivers prosecuted for careless driving – an offence which carries minimal penalties.

The more serious offence of dangerous driving has such a narrow definition that it is rarely used by prosecutors – even in cases where a cyclist has been killed.

Now the CTC, the UK’s largest cycling membership body, is collecting information from cyclist victims and their families to pile on the pressure for tougher sentencing.

A charge of careless driving – or driving without due care and attention – can be brought when a driver’s driving ‘fell below the standard of a careful and competent driver’. The sentence is invariably a small fine in a magistrates court.

However, campaigners say this charge is often brought in cases where a serious injury has occurred.

The more serious charge of causing death by dangerous driving can be brought when a driver’s driving ‘fell far below the standard of a careful and competent driver’. It is brought when a driver’s driving is deemed to be obviously dangerous and a death has occurred. But for the charge to be successful there must be clear aggravating factors, such as excessive speeding, or overtaking on a blind bend, that can be proven.

The maximum penalty is 14 years in prison, but in most cases the sentence handed out is usually much lower, unless there are many aggravating factors and multiple deaths.

And the tiny difference in definition between this charge and the charge of careless driving means that in many cases the higher charge of death by dangerous driving is not brought, and careless driving is brought instead.

Lorry driver, Michael Thorn, who killed Londoner Emma Foa when he turned left into her as he pulled away from traffic lights, was recently fined £300 after admitting a charge of driving without due care and attention at Westminster Magistrates' Court. He said he had been checking some paperwork while waiting at the junction and had checked his mirrors, but failed to see the mother of two.

Emma was crushed to death outside St Pancras Station, which has recently been criticized for a poor layout of the surrounding roads.

In 2006, a new law of ‘causing death by careless or inconsiderate driving’ was created.

It can be brought when a driver causes the death of another person because their driving ‘fell below the standard of a careful and competent driver’ or when the death was caused because the driver was driving without reasonable consideration for other people using the road. The maximum penalty is a prison sentence of five years and an unlimited fine.

While figures for cyclists deaths and subsequent prosecutions weren’t available at the time of writing, road safety campaign group Brake says that the statistics which are published speak for themselves.

In 2002, 6,063 drivers were sentenced for serious driving offences (including ‘death by dangerous driving’ and ‘dangerous driving’) in the Crown Court in England and Wales. But of these, 5,153 received under one year in prison. And only 25 received more than a five year sentence.

This year Keira Coultas, of Southampton, was sentenced to four years in jail for causing death by dangerous driving. She was texting her ex-husband while driving at 45mph in a 30mph zone when she hit and killed 19-year-old Jordan Wickington.

If you’ve been hit by a driver who was driving dangerously, but was prosecuted for careless driving the CTC wants to hear your story.

Email the organisation at richard.george@ctc.org.uk.

User Comments

There are 6 comments on this post

Showing 1 - 5 of 6 comments

  • What about careless cyclists? Riding at night with no lights. Riding with their hoods up and iPods in.

  • I have been hit by a motorist twice in the last three years, while commuting to my job. On both occasions the motorists themselves were appalled at what they had done, deeply shocked, and admitted liability straight away. Neither of them suffered any sanction from the police. In the first case I received £1500 plus the cost of repairs to my bike, by dealing directly with the insurer, in the second case I received £2000 plus the cost of repairs to my bike by using the CTC's legal advice line.

    With the police not prepared to prosecute even in the face of complete capitulation from the motorist, and the insurance companies able to put the matter to a close for the cost of a minor 'fender bender', what incentive is there for premiums to sky rocket for these dangerous drivers? In fact is seems that it is little more than an inconvenience if you if you injure a pedestrian or cyclist while driving your car, no wonder so many people choose the car over the bike even for short journeys.

  • Plod, CPS and magistrates are all useless. I was run over while walking on the payment with my children (then aged 2 & 4) by a speeding d*ug dealer, driving without a licence, insurance or MOT. Plod expressed sympathy for the "poor chap" becuase he was getting abuse in the street for what he had done - he ended up being bound over for driving without insurance. Apparently plod "couldn't prove" he was speeding when he lost control of the car. Of course he was driving again within days of the "accident" - quick tip: if you want to know what's going on with the scum where you live, don't ask plod, your local taxi drivers will know.

  • When an uninsured driver in a car without an MoT pulled into my path as he turned right, wrecked my bike and knocked me out the police did nothing about the accident. I think he got fined for the lack of insurance and MoT but that's all.

    As I was cycling home from work I got a solicitor paid for by the union and eventually got compensation through the Motor Insurers' Bureau. This was 20 years ago but I doubt if anything's changed. The police didn't seem to think my injuries counted for anything. It worries me that once motorists realise that they will usually not suffer any penalty for injuring (or even killing) cyclists or pedestrians - or anyone else for that matter then they have less reason for being careful.

    I can't help feeling that, as police and magistrates are usually drivers themselves they have an attitude that 'there but for the grace of god go I' and treat murder by motorcar leniently.

    Geoff

  • Unfortunately, it seems a large number of motorists aren't prosecuted at all when they hit cyclists. I know the driver who hit me (actually I hit him after he pulled out of a side road with zero time for me to do anything about it) got away with nothing more than slightly raised insurance premiums and a scratched car. Without witnesses it's 50:50 and they won't prosecute it's a shame when it's easy for them to hand out fines and points for people who speed and park badly even when these can sometimes be considered trivial compared to coming close to killing someone.

Post comment

You need to login or register to post comments.

Also on BikeRadar