Previous: « Walking your favourite trails
Next: 100 Issues Young? Yikes! »
The national average length...
Marcus Farley Wednesday, Aug 5, 2009 9.00am
For me, it’s generally always been a 100mm travel bike for most of my riding, and a 140mm travel bike for the scarier stuff.
But my new stead, and the other capable longer travel trail bikes, is efficient enough that I’m now looking at 140mm as my less, and 160mm as my more…
Something that I wish all fork manufacturers would get: I don’t want 140, 150 or 160mm, nor incremental variations between. And, Fox please take note, I don’t want 160-130-110mm. I want a simple lever that turns the front suspension between 140mm and 160mm to match my confidence and fear levels, as well as my latest stead’s capabilities at the rear. But, that’s me…
Because, as Lance so famously once said, “it’s not about the bike.”
My colleagues at What MTB have voted a short travel full suspension bike (the Giant Anthem) as their bike of the year. My riding buddy Simon wasn’t surprised. He is the barometer for me and our riding mates. He goes down stuff on his short travel Yeti ASR-SL that I bottled out on mine, and that I still bottle out on the Intense Traver VP. For, you see, it’s not always about the length, it’s also about what you do with it.
Over to you to give your views on what length is best for the UK. Leave your comments below.
Previous: « Walking your favourite trails
Next: 100 Issues Young? Yikes! »
User Comments
There are 7 comments on this post
Showing 1 - 7 of 7 comments
-
NatoED
Posted Thu 6 Aug, 7:24 am UTC Flag as inappropriate
have to agree here that for the UK 120mm is more than enough . I've ridden a Margam NPS race many years ago on a ridged single speed. I've done a few dragon races on a hardtail and came up with better times than chaps on long travel Dh bikes.
-
harrybostarmix@hotmail.co
Posted Fri 7 Aug, 9:15 pm UTC Flag as inappropriate
i run 130mm forks on my hardtail and only ever wind them up to full, when im on trips too Glyncorryg, Brechfa or Bedgebury. i only ever use about 110mm for everything else including descending off of Leith Hill, dorking(my localish thrash). no real need for full suss for UK trail/XC riding.
-
likewoah
Posted Sat 15 Aug, 10:12 am UTC Flag as inappropriate
Why don't they do adjustable travel rear shocks?
-
CycloRos
Posted Tue 18 Aug, 12:09 pm UTC Flag as inappropriate
For UK trail riding a 5" trail bike is ample, full suss or hardtail is personal preference. If you're ever heading somewhere like the Alps however then you're gonna want more of everything (suspension, tougher wheels/tyres, burlier frame etc...)
I hear you on the travel adjust front too, who cares about fine tuning to a single millimeter. Logical increments only PLEASE!!!
-
GhallTN6
Posted Tue 18 Aug, 12:23 pm UTC Flag as inappropriate
I've had my 100mm full suss 2006 Marin Mount Vision for about two and a half years, I've done Afan, Lake District, Peak District, Leith Hill, South Downs, Cannock Chase, Bedgebury and stacks of cracking local trails, enjoying every minute. This bike goes up anything and if I don't go down something it's me that's bottling out, not the bike. I have the shortest suspension bike out of all my riding friends, and I'm seriously thinking about getting a 140, however, those friends are trying to pursuade me not too get one as they think I'm stupid enough on this one. it's only the fact I want to crack the Alps and perhaps do the Megavalanche that I'm thinking of upgrading!
-
marcus Farley
Posted Tue 18 Aug, 6:25 pm UTC Flag as inappropriate
some bikes do have rear travel adjust: think Intense and Nicolai, for instance.
-
silveringsurfer
Posted Tue 25 Aug, 11:48 am UTC Flag as inappropriate
My Scott Genius has lockout, 80mm and 140mm rear adjustable on a lever -works fab so why don't they do it for forks?
- 1









Post this story to: