News

Fri 30 Jan 2009, 10:17 am UTC

News archive

Cycle contraflow trial for London's City

By Richard Peace

Cyclists pedaling through London's City area this summer may find themselves riding against the flow of motorised traffic on certain one-way roads – quite legally.

In an attempt to raise the uptake of cycling, the City of London Corporation wants to allow cyclists to ride against the traffic in seven one-way streets in a trial scheme believed to cost around £45,000 and said to be the largest of its kind in the capital.  

It appears the City of London Corporation has held out the promise of the scheme being rolled out to other areas if the trial is successful.

A spokesperson for the Corporation said: “The scheme will make cycling in the City safer by enabling cyclists to avoid busy streets.” London Cycling Campaign has also voiced support for the greater route choice it will afford cyclists.

The response from motorists’ organisations has been cautious rather than overtly hostile. The Automobile Association noted it might lead to an increase in cyclist-pedestrian collisions, with pedestrians stepping into the road, unaware that cyclists may be coming the 'wrong way'. The RAC Foundation said the trial should be 'carefully signed and carefully enforced.'

The streets earmarked for the trial are: West Smithfield (connecting to Giltspur Street), Salisbury Court, Throgmorton Street, Cloth Fair, Finsbury Circus (Moorgate), Creechurch Lane and the east half of Fann Street.

Last summer, BikeRadar reported on Kensington and Chelsea's seemingly imminent move to introduce trial streets for contraflow cycling. However, a recent call to the council revealed that they are still awaiting official approval of the appropriate signage from the Department of Transport - a move that the Corporation of London will also have to take before it embarks on the trial.

The Chelsea trial scheme, like the one proposed for the City, will not include any kind of segregation for cyclists, such as white lines on the road. This may be responsible for the trouble with signage.

The Department for Transport has said in the past that a simple combination of 'no entry' signs and a plate excepting cyclists could lead to widespread abuse by all road users.

Cyclists Touring Club, the UK's largest members cycling organisation, says this is contrary to the evidence from continental Europe where just such a combination is used without significant problems.  

You can follow BikeRadar on Twitter at twitter.com/bikeradar.

User Comments

There are 2 comments on this post

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 comments

  • I live in Switzerland, where these kinds of systems are completely normal, and I haven't noticed any major problems. The "contraflow" lanes as you Brits like to call them are normally marked as bike lines with arrows drawn in the opposite direction to motor vehicle traffic. A little extra caution has to be used by cyclists on them for drivers and pedestrians not being fully aware, but not much more than is necessary on a standard two-way road.

  • A little extra caution has to be used by cyclists on them for drivers and pedestrians not being fully aware

    ^this

    I live in Belgium and we have similar systems. I drive aswell as ride and can tell you that I am usually not aware of whether bikes are allowed to come both ways on a one way street when driving. The signage is not clear enough but if it were it would likely be so complex as to be counter-productive. I hope it works for London, it's not bad here but I still get dirty looks from car drivers and the lanes have been in place here for years!

    DoT statement about possible abuse by other road users of "a simple combination of 'no entry' signs and a plate excepting cyclists" is not borne out by my experience in Brussels.

  • 1

Post comment:

You need to login or register to post comments.

Please confirm you are a person by entering the words in the box below:

Related links

Also on BikeRadar