UK minister backs call for more traffic police to protect cyclists
In an unexpected development at a meeting today of the Parliamentary Transport Select Committee’s inquiry on road safety Britain’s Transport Minister Jim Fitzpatrick MP backed calls for more traffic police on the streets to protect cyclists and pedestrians. Up until now the official line has been non-commital on the need for extra traffic officers while at the same time stressing the deterrent value of traffic calming measures and speed cameras.
CTC , which represents the UK’s cyclists had earlier also called for speed limits and other rules of the road to be backed up by a reform of road traffic law. The organisation contends that the current distinction between ‘careless’ and ‘dangerous’ driving is hopelessly muddled and greater priority must be given to traffic policing to increase the likelihood that dangerous drivers will be caught and their offences properly investigated and prosecuted. Roger Gffen CTC’s National Campaigns and Policy Manager welcomed the minister’s remarks.
Less unexpectedly the Road Safety Minister reiterated his backing for increased use of 20mph speed limits in urban areas. Members of the committee were also supportive of the. The 20mph limit is backed by 70 organisations, including the CTC and, a claimed, 75% of the general public.
During the CTC’s evidence to the inquiry Roger Geffen called for the Government to set out a new vision for safe community streets to enable people to cycle and to feel comfortable letting their children cycle to school.
“Most people would prefer to live on a street where they could feel safe cycling and walking, or allowing their children to get out and about, instead of being cooped up indoors as car-dependent couch potatoes. If we are to encourage healthy and sustainable living, we must make sure the streets outside our front doors are safe and welcoming for all."
Besides speed policy, traffic law and enforcement, Roger Geffen identified three other priority areas for action: the long-overdue publication of new Government guidance on pedestrian and cycle-friendly street design – this was originally subject to consultation 4 years ago having being promised in 2002, the need for more action to improve vehicle safety to tackle the threats posed by goods vehicles and for research into the link between cycle training and both cyclist and driver safety.
The Government is expected to publish a new 10-year Road Safety Strategy next year, which will cover the decade from 2010 onwards. Consultation is due to begin later this year.
User Comments
There are 4 comments on this post
Showing 1 - 4 of 4 comments
-
Cyberhythm
Posted Tue 3 Jun, 3:31 pm BST Flag as inappropriate
This morning I counted 16 parked vehicles blocking the cycle routes on a 2-3 mile stretch of road on my way into work. I personally would feel much safer cycling if the law was changed to prohibit this sort of behaviour. I'm sure this could be a real earner for the government if penalties were imposed on those responsible and who knows, it might also reduce congestion and encourage more people to cycle to work at the same time.
-
frontmech
Posted Fri 23 May, 7:14 pm BST Flag as inappropriate
Police cycling is abysmal. If they don't know how to ride their own bikes properly how can we expect them to know what is and is not good riding in others?
The police require their car drivers to pass and maintain a higher level of driving test, but seemingly bike riding is too trivially easy for them to bother.
-
andwags
Posted Fri 23 May, 12:51 pm BST Flag as inappropriate
I would like to see regular police out on traffic patrol on their bikes so that they can see the poop we put up with and actual start giving out some tickets, not just warnings.
-
aurelio
Posted Fri 23 May, 8:26 am BST Flag as inappropriate
This is a positive move but if British roads are to be made safer for all there also needs to be a dramatic change in the attitude of the police themselves toward driving crime. It is no secret that many police officers are themselves habitual driving criminals both on and off duty, especially with regards speeding. As the House of Commons Transport Committee highlighted in it’s report `Traffic Law and it’s enforcement` the police often don’t treat driving crimes as being `real` crimes even when death or serious injury have resulted and frequently blame the victims of bad drivers for their injuries, rather than holding the driver to be accountable. See
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmtran/105/10502.htm
The Committee’s report certainly accords with my own experience, with one inspector in my local force admitting to me that it was an unofficial `official` policy of his force not to prosecute motorists who caused harm to cyclist unless the victim effectively ended up in either a coffin or a wheelchair, and sometimes not even then.
To a large degree the police have taken it on themselves to decriminalize criminal driving behaviours, in most cases preferring to `leave it to the insurance companies to sort out`. Similarly, drivers are almost never prosecuted for offences such as driving without due care unless someone has been harmed as a result, even though this charge is supposed to be used in an educational manner, with the consequences of a drivers behaviour being immaterial.
Across the country traffic teams have been scrapped and not just because of the pressure on police resources. Another major factor is the way so many senior officers feel that their polices should reflect what the public want. As the majority of people drive this means cutting back on the enforcement of traffic laws, especially with regards speeding, so as to not alienate` the (law-breaking) motorist. Conversely `responding to local concerns` all too often means sending of teams of police and community support officers who, in response to a few complaints from the local cyclist-hating `Daily Mail Readers taking time off from complaining about `the persecution of the beleaguered motorist`, go out and(completely ignoring the relevant Home Office guidelines on the use of Fixed Penalty Notices) fine any cyclist the see riding on a footway or in a pedestrian zone. The irony is that many of these cyclists will only have taken to the foot way in the first place due to the danger they face on the practically un-policed highways!
- 1









Bookmark with: