While British riders tend to snigger whenever it’s mentioned, the cycling phenomenon known as the bonk is no laughing matter. Deriving from the original meaning ‘to hit’, the bonk refers to that catastrophic moment when there’s suddenly nothing left in the tank; when the legs turn to jelly, and getting to the finish becomes an altogether supreme effort of will.
The simple explanation for its occurrence is that long-endurance exercise depletes the body’s store of glycogen, which produces the energy required to maintain performance. When the glycogen depletes entirely, the body has no more fuel and instead burns fat, resulting in a surge of fatigue and a performance collapse. That’s the simple version anyway, but research shows it may be more complex than this nutritional description suggests, with genetics, mental factors and training all playing a role. So in this examination of the bonk we start with the basics: the nutritional causes and how you can safeguard yourself against them; and then we move onto the more complex and controversial aspects.
A cyclist’s best protection against the bonk is to ensure that glycogen is fully topped up before starting and that it’s replenished throughout the ride. The former is generally achieved through carbohydrate loading – that’s ensuring all meals in the 48 hours prior to a big event or training ride contain a high level of carbohydrate.
But this certainly shouldn’t be taken to extremes. Many amateur athletes often use the carbo-loading excuse to pig out on pasta, potatoes and rice, believing it will protect them from the bonk. Unfortunately, it’s not that simple.
"Every day, you need about 7-10g of carbohydrate per kilogram of body weight to keep glycogen fully topped up,"says Karen Reid, who runs the sports nutrition website www. performancefood.co.uk. “Overloading on carbs will result in weight gain.”
Clearly, pasta, rice and potatoes are not suitable for on-bike snacks so cyclists generally use a sports drink and supplements to replenish glycogen stores during the ride, especially as they also have hydration benefits. It’s estimated that Tour de France competitors receive 50 per cent of their daily calorie intake from on-bike supplements, so it’s clear that a good carbohydrate sports drink is essential. Picking the right one is trickier.
Essentially it’s a balancing act between glycogen replenishment and rehydration, as the two offset each other. The higher the carbohydrate levels of the drink, the more it disturbs rehydration and the harder it is to stomach. For that reason, most riders opt for an isotonic drink containing about 6-7 per cent carbohydrate, which balances the need for glycogen replenishment with hydration. But this doesn’t mean you shouldn’t experiment with other levels.
On a cold day, rehydration may not be a priority, so if you can stomach a higher carbohydrate level, go for it, because it’ll ward off the bonk for longer. Trial and error should provide a sound basis for what works for you.
There is some evidence that mixing a few things into your sports drink may delay glycogen depletion further. Though it’s still controversial due to the fact that it’s a diuretic and may work against rehydration, caffeine is now widely included in sports drinks. This is because studies have shown that ingesting it before and during exercise results in performance increases, particularly in bouts over two hours. While the exact mechanism remains unclear, one theory is that caffeine increases the release of free fatty acids into the blood early in exercise. This increases muscle fat oxidation and decreases carbohydrate oxidation, sparing muscle glycogen.
"You don’t need a lot of caffeine to get the maximum effect,” says Professor Asker Jeukendrup of Birmingham University, whose recent study found that caffeine can boost the carbohydrate absorption rate by as much as 26 per cent. “Two or three milligrams per kilo of body weight is about right.”
Another controversial area is protein. Protein has long been used as a recovery food to repair muscle damage, but now some scientists believe it may work during exercise too, as extra protection against the bonk. The supporters of protein point out that during prolonged exercise it can contribute 5-10 per cent of total energy demands. They also say that although carbohydrate remains the principle fuel source, having a drink with a carbohydrate/protein ratio of about 4:1 means you’re topping up your protein stores too, and this additional energy source could make the difference between bonking and not. Three recent studies have found this to be the case, but two have found that protein had no extra effect. The jury remains out, but if you’re particularly prone to the bonk it could be worth giving protein a try.
Another common mistake is to assume that you don’t need to start topping up glycogen levels until well into a ride. Researchers from Maastricht University disproved this by examining 10 male subjects on a three hour cycle. They found sports drinks reduced the glycogen used to maintain a certain pace all through exercise, not just at the end when the bonk threatened to debilitate. So it’s important to get sipping early. Finally, it’s crucial to know exactly how much carbohydrate to consume during a ride to maximise your chances of avoiding the bonk. Helpfully, a separate study by the Gatorade Sports Science Institute found that the optimum amount was between 30 and 60g of carbohydrate per hour. Although it’s probably closer to the latter for most people, which, surprisingly, is almost a litre of isotonic drink per hour. Just a male thing? Recently, a team from Springfield College in Massachusetts studied the bonk in marathon running, where it’s commonly known as ‘the wall’. Rather than focusing on nutrition, their study looked at other factors such as expectation and gender. The results were intriguing. Of the 300 runners studied, 43 per cent felt they’d bonked. The majority of these were men.
Indeed, the results showed that men were almost twice as likely to succumb. The researchers believe this is partly due to expectations 28 per cent of the men said they ‘expected’ to hit the wall compared to 20 per cent of women but competitiveness may also play a key role. This may be largely a function of the men being more likely to push the pace and, as a result, experience more characteristics of the wall than the women, the researchers conclude. Or could it be that men are just genetically more prone to bonk? Certainly there did seem to be a genetic role.
The researchers found no correlation with age or previous performance the faster and more experienced athletes were just as likely to bonk. In fact, runners who had hit the wall before were the most likely to hit it again. Some athletes may simply have an elevated propensity for hitting the wall and even perfect preparation may not prevent it, the researchers say. Another school of thought links a propensity to bonk with pre-race nerves. This is based on the ‘Cusp Catastrophe Model’ formulated by L Hardy and J Fazey in a 1987 paper.
This paper states that when anxiety is low, for example in training, physiological arousal (increased heartbeat, sweaty palms, butterfl ies in the stomach) will interact with performance in the shape of an inverted ‘U’, that is, the more physiologically aroused an athlete is, the better their performance will be up to a certain point, when it will tail off as gradually as it rose. But when anxiety is high, for example in a big competition, increased physiological arousal will be benefi cial up to a certain point, at which time any further increase will be catastrophic See ‘On the cusp’ below.
There are two training approaches to avoiding the bonk, one is controversial, the other, on the whole, isn’t. The latter is simply to do as much base training as possible. This low-intensity work recruits more and more muscle fibres and ensures more blood capillaries wrap themselves tightly around these fi bres, allowing the transfer of oxygen from the blood to the muscles to be as economic as possible. The more economic your system, the less glycogen you burn. Every muscle is made up of two types of fibre: fast-twitch and slow-twitch. Fast-twitch fibres are used predominantly in explosive events, such as weight-lifting or sprinting, and slow-twitch are what you want primarily for endurance; you use a greater percentage of slow-twitch muscle fibres the more aerobically fit you are. Both types do require fuel but slow-twitch muscles are able to burn fat as well as carbohydrate/glycogen.
Joe Friel, author of several training books and coach to national champions and Olympians, recommends using your heart rate (HR) as a guide to knowing when you’ve recruited all the muscle fibres possible. Joe suggests cycling for two or three hours at a comfortable pace, say 75 per cent of your maximum HR, and as long as the pace stays constant, so should your HR. If it drifts upwards throughout the ride, you should do base training a little longer.
As aerobic fitness improves, a greater percentage of the workload is done with slow-twitch muscle fibres, he says. This means that economy improves as more fat is used for fuel, sparing glycogen so the athlete can go longer without bonking. A more controversial school of thought advocates specific ‘bonk training’. This involves training early in the morning, before breakfast, so that your body’s store of glycogen is low. Proponents claim this forces the body to bonk early in exercise, causing the body to adapt to burning fat.
There’s actually some research that supports this concept, says Friel. But I don’t use this with my athletes as it also means the quality of training decreases and there’s a longer postworkout recovery. Though bonking during a race is catastrophic, you also want to ensure it doesn’t happen during training. If you don’t refuel properly, you may bonk during your next session, particularly if you train on a daily basis. Timing is crucial here, because for the four hours immediately following vigorous exercise, carbohydrate is converted into muscle glycogen at three times the norma lrate.
Miss this window and your recovery will be much slower. Researchers from Loughborough University found low glycaemic index (GI) meals work best. Athletes who ate tinned peaches, yoghurt, muesli and pasta (low GI) subsequently exercised for 12 minutes longer at the same speed than athletes on a high GI diet, featuring white bread, bananas and Lucozade. “The low GI diet burned more fat, sparing muscle glycogen for later in exercise,” says lead researcher Dr Emma Stevenson. “The athletes also reported feeling more satiated after low GI recovery meals even though they contained the same calories – so it should help with ongoing weight loss too.”
The one and only time we saw Lance Armstrong bonk – on the Col de Joux-Plane in the 2000 Tour de France – he described it as “the hardest day of my life on a bike.” Unfortunately, most cyclists can relate to Lance’s torturous day. Hopefully though, this guide will have shown that by eating right, training right and thinking right, you might be able to stop worrying about the bonk happening to you and start sniggering at it again.
On the cusp
It's possible that a very nervous athlete may suffer a catastrophic drop in performance, exactly like a bonk, though it has nothing to do with nutritional preparation. This tallies with the experience of many riders who 'choke' in big races. Most sports psychologists agree the best way to combat this kind of bonk is to build self-confidence. This isn't an easy thing to do, but it can be achieved, often through counter- intuitive methods.
For example, as humans we base our level of confi dence on our most recent experience so for a nervous individual it's important that this experience is positive. Given that during training anxiety levels are low, performance is likely to be high so for nervous individuals it might be beneficial not to do any warm-up races prior to a major event as then the rider will go into the event confident from the results of their low-anxiety training.
In any meaningful performance an athlete will get nervous because there are always consequences and some of these will be bad, says Louise Friend, one of the UK's top sports psychologists, who has worked with the British triathlon team. It's the athlete's interpretation of the nerves which is important, and for each athlete there's an optimum level of anxiety. It's crucial the athlete learns to find this level.