Feature

Thu 30 Apr, 2:01 pm UTC

How do MET make their helmets?

By Matthew Cole

Ever wondered how a MET (from helMET in case you were wondering) helmet is made? We went to the company’s Italian headquarters to find out…

Founded on the shores of Lake Como, Italy in 1987 by Lucianna Sala and Massimo Gaiatto, the MET helmet factory now sits in the heart of the Alps in Talamona. The state-of-the-art facility is capable of producing 3,000 lids a day.

MET pride themselves on the fact they design and manufacture helmets on one site, enabling them to innovate and develop new products much more quickly than their counterparts.

Birth of a lid

Each new helmet begins life on a computer screen, where the shape and venting is designed. Exhaustive testing on every new model is carried out before any physical helmet is made.

Structural impact simulation testing is done to find any weaknesses, and geometry modifications can be made following 3D computer model testing.

Once the helmet has passed this stage, a 3D printing machine is put to work and creates a life-size model of the helmet.

3D printer:

To the production line... and the robots

When the helmet gets the go-ahead, it can be produced in bulk in the company’s own factory.

The outer shell of each helmet is created from a polymer sheet which is heated and then blow-moulded.

Polymer sheet :

The shell:

The most impressive part of the helmet manufacturing process comes next – the robots! The outer shell is placed on the mount in the robot station, where each robotic arm has been pre-programmed to make a series of cuts.

Robot in action:

The robot then gets to work, using a fine drill bit to cut the venting holes, strap anchors and any other incision needed on each helmet with absolute precision. The completed shell is removed from the mount, ready for the next process.

Robot in action:

Any waste from this stage is recycled and turned into, among other things, coat hangers – it's MET’s aim to be as environmentally friendly as possible.

Poly injection

The next stage in the manufacturing process is to fill the shell with polystyrene – the stuff that will protect your head if you hit the deck. The polystyrene is melted and injected inside a large machine, and the shell is then cooled with water. This is later recycled and used in the building’s toilets. After three minutes, the helmet comes out of the machine and is ready to be tested and finished.

Rigorous testing

MET distribute their helmets worldwide, and the headwear must conform to the standards of each country it is sold in.

All testing is carried out in the on-site laboratory using a range of punishing apparatus. The machine we were shown simulates a 60mph crash onto flat ground. There’s another anvil they use to simulate hitting the corner of a pavement.

In the testing lab: in the testing lab

It was clear from the demonstration we saw and all the tested helmets on display that the testing is meticulous.

Tested helmets with detailed report on areas of damage etc: tested helmets with detailed report on areas of damage etc

Strap me up

Once tested and built, the final helmet is ready for the addition of straps, peaks, stickers and anything else.

Lady adding finishing touches: lady adding finishing touches

How long will my helmet last?

There are many theories regarding when you should replace your helmet – which is why MET decided to answer the question by testing their own models. And the result? For eight years a MET helmet will do its job just fine, as long as you don't damage it in a crash.

Why are top-end cycle helmets so expensive when they have less material in them than cheap ones?

Sine thesis:

Because high-end helmets like MET's new Sine Thesis have less material (polystyrene) in them, they’re more aerodynamic, will keep your head cool more efficiently and will be lighter.

The process of creating a top-end helmet is far more time consuming, intricate and requires more energy than producing a cheaper model, as we found on our visit. More venting on a helmet requires more cutting and therefore more time, which equals more money.

A low-end model can be created in mass quantities using a mould which is capable of producing helmets six times as fast as a £134.99 Sine Thesis, for example. The Sine Thesis has a more complex design and therefore needs more time and attention paid to it.

The production process for each helmet is the same, however. “We combine all features in every helmet: first safety, then design, then ventilation,” said product manager Matteo Tenni.

Want to see more behind the scenes stories and videos? Be sure to check out BikeRadar's Industry Insider, where we give you an in-depth look at Colnago and FSA.

User Comments

There are 7 comments on this post

Showing 1 - 7 of 7 comments

  • "exhaustive testing ... before any physical helmet is made"?

    I think that's called simulation...

  • Yes.

  • Thank god they test them, they have saved my life 3 times over the last 10years after the oh so nice car drivers knocked me off my bike.

  • Would the drivers have knocked you off if you hadn't been wearing a helmet? Hospital statistics indicate you are more likeley to be hit by a car and have more accidents if you WEAR a helmet.

    I know, I know - a can of worms...

  • Irrespective of whether a cyclist is wearing a helmet or not, drivers shouldn't use this as an excuse when they knock us off our bikes. I've had a few lucky escapes, and thankfully have been wearing my helmet on all occasions. Though I never ride my bike without wearing it.

  • Nice

  • A CNC router with vacuum fixture is hardly an impressive bit of kit and isn't what I'd call a robot. Compare it to an Okuma 5 axis CNC milling machine with multi pallet turntable and robotised tool selection and it looks like the dark ages. The reviewer obviously has little manufacturing experience. I have worked with Geiss Routers (CNC) and the cycle time increase for the more intricate high end helmets will be seconds not hours, the cost difference bearing in mind the materials are the same and the moulding processes will be the same are negligible. I reckon a £100 helmet would cost maybe 5 or 10% more to make than a £40 helmet but the profit margin is much higher. Pay your money and take your choice but be under no illusion that the more costly the helmet the more it costs to make. They are making you pay for the features. In pure manufacturing cost terms it would actually be cheaper for them to only make one type of helmet, say the best design and then sell that. Reduce set-up time in the factory, low complexity, and easier to manage the build schedule. This would then make the best lid alot cheaper for the consumer but they dont want to do that, instead we get a range of lids, some slightly inferior in performance and pay through the nose for them. A great business model for the companies but not good for the consumer. I'm not singling out MET as all bike helmet manufacturers fitm into the same model.

  • 1

Post comment:

You need to login or register to post comments.

Also on BikeRadar