Training: Heart rate monitor basics

By Harry Blackwood, Cycling Plus | Friday, Jan 7, 2011 1.00pm

Using a heart rate (HR) monitor isn't rocket science, it's just a case of getting in the right zone. Here, Harry Blackwood – who finally cracked HR training after returning to cycling at the age of 50 – explains how to do it.

Getting started

Training with a heart rate monitor really couldn’t be simpler as long as you understand the basics. There are many ways of structuring HR training plans, but all of them employ the basics of training within personal zones.

Eddie Fletcher of Fletcher Sport Science is amazed by how many people have HR monitors and download all the numbers but haven’t a clue what they mean. “Men are by far the worst," he says. "They like to brag about how high their HR was during a session and for how long. That’s not good training at all. Find your resting HR, get the best idea you can of your max HR, and then work your zones out. That way those random numbers will start to have some meaning.”

I ’ve used an HR monitor to try to improve my performance in three different sports – running, rowing and cycling. The experiment was a miserable failure in two of them and it’s fair to say that I very nearly managed a dismal hat-trick. I dabbled with an HR monitor during a long ‘career’ as a club runner and used one occasionally in my training for rowing, so it was no surprise that when I returned to cycling four years ago, I turned to my trusty Cardiosport monitor. No surprise either that I almost fell at the first hurdle.

The problem with HR training is that it requires discipline. The bigger problem is that it demands even more humility. Last September, when I embarked on what I’d decided would be my final attempt to use an HR monitor properly, I was only a few weeks into my programme when I very nearly threw the towel in. I was doing a four-hour base-building session and trying to keep my HR between 121-131bpm when I heard whistling behind me. I glanced over my shoulder to see a bloke on an ancient Dawes touring bike complete with tatty old panniers coming past. Then I noticed the sandals…

I was mortified. Here I was astride a beautiful carbon fibre racing bike, kitted out in the finest clobber, and I’d just been blown out the back door by an extra from Last of the Summer Wine. This is where that huge amount of humility I mentioned comes in. Every sinew in my body was telling me to blast past him, but somehow I resisted. I swallowed my pride and continued training. That’s the discipline I was talking about.

I’ll always remember that day as the day I learnt to train properly with a monitor, and it’s fair to say that I’m a convert: I’ve been training with one religiously for 12 months and the improvements in my cycling are obvious. I’m fitter, faster, leaner and stronger. What’s more, blokes in sandals don’t blast past me any more.

The Zones

The best way to get your resting HR is to take it first thing in the morning every day for a week and work out the average. Make sure you're well rested and not ill or under any stress. Put your HR strap on and just lie there for a couple of minutes, trying to relax as much as possible. Note the lowest figure you see and repeat the procedure the following day.

At the end of the week you’ll know what your resting HR average is and you can confidently use this figure as the basis of your training. But don’t be fooled by thinking that having a low resting HR means you are super-fit. “Generally speaking, a low resting HR is indicative of a well trained athlete,” explains Fletcher, “but it’s not always the case. There are people who have a genetically low HR regardless of fitness.”

Maximum HR

Many believe that you can calculate your maximum HR by using the formula of 220 minus your age. For some people this may be accurate, but for many it will be wildly out. I’m 54 years old so, using the formula, my max HR should be 166 (220-54). It’s actually 178, which is a big difference when training in very tight zones.

A much more accurate formula is 210 minus half your age, then subtract 5% of your body weight in pounds. Add four for a male and 0 for a female. The only way to get a truly accurate max HR figure is to get a physiological test at a sport science centre, such as Fletcher Sport Science, but you can get a reasonable estimate by doing your own max HR test. Only undertake this test if you are fit and exercise regularly, though.

Warm up thoroughly for at least 15 minutes. On a long, steady hill start off fairly briskly and increase your effort every minute. Do this seated for at least five minutes until you can’t go any faster. At this point get out of the saddle and sprint as hard as you can for 15 seconds. Stop and get off the bike and immediately check your HR reading. This is your max HR.

“Don’t forget that your max HR figure is sport specific,” says Fletcher. “This means that your maximum on a bike will invariably be much lower than it is when you're running because the bike is taking some of your weight.”

HR zones

Having established the key numbers (max HR and resting HR) you're now ready to work out your training zones. There are lots of calculators on the web and, while many people use five training zones, I prefer the six-zone system prescribed by the Association of British Cycling Coaches. Fletcher is also a big fan of the six zones, although he points out that there is actually a recovery zone as well which is important. “If athletes are to perform well they need to recover well,” he says. “I monitor every session my athletes do and I can tell very easily when they need to recover and how long that recovery needs to be.”

Zone 1 (60-65% of maximum heart rate): For long, easy rides, to improve the combustion and storage of fats.

Zone 2 (65-75% of MHR): The basic base training zone. Longish rides of medium stress.

Zone 3 (75-82% of MHR): For development of aerobic capacity and endurance with moderate volume at very controlled intensity.

Zone 4 (82-89% of MHR): For simulating pace when tapering for a race.

Zone 5 (89-94% of MHR): For raising anaerobic threshold. Good sessions for 10- and 25-mile time-trials.

Zone 6 (94-100% of MHR): For high-intensity interval training to increase maximum power and speed

Average HR

Beware your average HR. I’ve come back from two-hour rides and my HR has been an average of 130bpm, which would be a Zone 2 ride. But far from it. Looking at the graphs I can see that I’ve actually had several peaks during the ride where my HR has been over 150 and sometimes over 160. Not the ride that an average HR figure would suggest. ake sure you discipline yourself to spend 90-100 percent of your ride time in the right zone. This may mean getting off and walking on the hills in the early days. Stick with it. You’ll be amazed at the results.

The sessions

As cyclists we demand a lot from our training. We want to climb hills like Alberto Contador, sprint like Mark Cavendish and have the ability to time trial like Fabian Cancellara. We’d also like our cycling to fit in around our family and work life, and if we can also shed a few pounds while continuing to eat pies and cream cakes then that would be nice too.

Training using an HR monitor may not turn you into a world-beating cyclist but it will make you an infinitely better all-round cyclist. If you're training for specific events such as a hilly 100-mile sportive or a 25-mile time trial, you can tailor your training to suit. If you just want to lose weight, cycling in the correct zones will burn fat and you’ll shed excess pounds in no time. Here are some key sessions that will make you a fitter and faster cyclist.

Getting started:

Go slower, get faster

It sounds impossible but this is the basic starting point for HR training. I started off by doing long Zone 1 and Zone 2 rides. It was slow, boring and tortuous at times. What happened over a period of months was amazing. In a nutshell I was still riding in Zone 2 but I was zipping along compared with when I started. By going slower I’d made my body more efficient. It was like a light being switched on: if I can go this fast in Zone 2 then just how fast could I go in the higher zones?

Fletcher, who’s an exercise physiologist, is adamant that by going slow you will get faster. The Evesham-based coach even has a mug on his desk emblazoned with the words ‘slow is the new fast’. But he has some sage words for anyone who thinks that HR training is like waving a magic wand. “Training is boring. Anyone who says they can make base training sessions more entertaining and can introduce fun is kidding you. Just accept it that those long, steady rides on the bike will be boring but they will bring results. There are no shortcuts and no quick fixes.”

Because discipline for these slow rides is so important, it’s probably a good idea to ride them on your own, without the temptation of trying to keep up with faster mates, or rising to the bait of village sign sprints or traffic light grand prixs. Key session: 3hrs in Zone 2. Stay in the zone and stick to it. Don’t be tempted to push on the hills.

Burn fat, save time

We all have to manage our work-life balance but don’t think that wanting to burn fat means you have to go out for five or six hours on the bike riding in Zone 2. By using HIIT methods (high intensity interval training) you’ll burn far more fat and become a fitter and faster rider into the bargain. Yes, it’s going to hurt but it will do you the power of good and the whole session will take less than an hour.

Make sure you do a decent 15-minute warm-up and you're ready to go. Depending on your level of fitness you're going to do 4-6 all-out sprints of 30 seconds with 4-5 minutes of easy pedalling. During these all-out efforts expect to see your HR rise to 85-90% of your HR max. Give it all you have right through the 30-second burst. Do these for 6-8 weeks and marvel at the fat you’ve lost. Try it – it really works.

But don’t think that training hard means you can eat like a pig. Fletcher has a word of warning for those who think they can ignore their diet and just ride to lose weight. “Weight control has to be about diet,” he says. “If you want to lose weight you’d be better off concentrating on what goes in, and concentrating on quality rather than necessarily reducing quantity.” Key session: 5min warm-up and then 4-6 30sec sprints with 4-5min rest.

Become an endurance monster

Hands up if you’ve got to the last 20-odd miles of a big sportive and found that you’re absolutely done in and can barely turn the pedals. That sinking feeling can be attributed to a number or factors such as going off too fast, insufficient fuelling or hydration, or just too many hills. But the main culprit is likely to be a lack of endurance, which is where targeted HR training comes in.

What you need to do is LSD – no, it’s not a mind-altering drug, it stands for ‘long, steady distance’. By doing one session of 3-4 hours in Zone 2 and another session of 2 hours in Zone 3 every week your endurance will come on in leaps and bounds. Add a few long intervals once your base is more established and you’ll develop both endurance and speed.

This is an area Fletcher specialises in. Endurance training is his forte and he cautions those who think unfettered big miles will produce endurance no matter what. “It’s amazing how many cyclists do lots and lots of junk miles,” he says. “It’s all about getting the balance right between the length of the session and the zone you're riding in.” Key session: 3-4hrs in Zone 2 with 10min burst of Zone 3-4 every hour.

Easy does it

I have a confession to make: I’ve spent a lifetime as a serial over-trainer. I’ve trained too hard at every sport I’ve ever done, which means I’ve suffered loads of injuries and too many lacklustre performances. For the past few years I’ve been training smarter, though: my hard days are very hard and my easy days are very easy. In the past the easy and the hard seemed to blend into one. I know that riding at a very low HR is actually doing me good by allowing my body to recover. Make sure you have at least one rest day per week and another day that is a really slow recovery ride done in Zone 1 or even lower.

A common cause of poor discipline in moderating efforts is riding with stronger, faster riders, says Fletcher. “Many cyclists go out on the Sunday club run and try to keep up with the faster riders. Then they probably need five or six days to recover from the effort – their training is going nowhere.” Key session: 1hr flat ride with HR constantly below Zone 2.

Testing, testing…

As you get fitter and stronger, your cardiovascular system will get more efficient so that you can do more work for the same effort. In heart rate terms, this will mean at a set HR you will be able to ride a set distance faster as you get fitter. One of the most well known of such aerobic improvement tests is the Maximum Aerobic Function, or ‘MAF’ test, named by heart rate training pioneer Dr Phil Maffetone, and it’s a great way of proving to yourself that all those long hours of winter base training are actually working.

Regular testing might also reveal any performance drop-offs that can be the early warning signs of overtraining or impending illness. Maffetone suggests planning a route that initially takes about 30 minutes to complete and then, after a warm-up, riding it at a precise heart rate, while timing yourself. “The important thing is to pick a heart rate that falls within your base training zone and to stick to it,” he says, “both throughout the test and in every subsequent retest.” This submaximal aerobic effort is typically 65-75% of your Max HR – in Zone 2.

“Perform the test regularly to chart your fitness progress,” says Maffetone, “perhaps once a month. Doing it more frequently won’t realistically reflect your progress and might lead to obsession with the results, while any less frequently means you’ll miss out on the other benefit of this kind of test, which is to flag up any underlying health or overtraining problems.” Key session: Time this monthly test ride over a set distance at a set aerobic heart rate in Zone 2. Record your times so you can chart your progress over the months. 

Session:

You can follow BikeRadar on Twitter at twitter.com/bikeradar and on Facebook at facebook.com/BikeRadar.

User Comments

There are 26 comments on this post

Showing 1 - 26 of 26 comments

  • I guess the

    Key session: 5min warm-up and then 4-6 30sec sprints with 4-5min rest.

    Could be done on a turbo too?

  • Good article, a HR monitor can be a great training tool. I actually believe that once you know your zones/effort level and how they 'feel' that's a much better way of training. But you learn a lot from the HR monitor.

    Also don't think there is any negatives to riding the hills a bit harder on a steady endurance ride. It may raise your HR 10-15 beats but can't see how that would have a detrimental effect on your session or recovery.

  • The premise of this article is good - which is essentially don't over train, and do long slow sessions to increase base fitness.

    **BUT** Can you really divide the heart rate range into such small, precise sections? Especially if you are estimating you maximum heart rate. Lets face it unless you have defibrillator and actually hit your max HR then your guess might have an error of 5-10%. That's almost as large as some of the described zones !

  • [quote]Also don't think there is any negatives to riding the hills a bit harder on a steady endurance ride. It may raise your HR 10-15 beats but can't see how that would have a detrimental effect on your session or recovery.[/quote]

    +1

  • “Don’t forget that your max HR figure is sport specific,” says Fletcher. “This means that your maximum on a bike will invariably be much lower than it is when you're running because the bike is taking some of your weight.”

    Is this correct? I would have thought that your maximum HR is your maximum HR?

  • Where does resting heart rate come into it? The zones are based on your max heart rate?

  • Max heart rate will be different in different sports: this is because your legs will be carrying the extra weight, so it will be different for rowing, running etc.

    I have been led to believe that to get the correct zones you do the following:

    Max HR minus Resting HR will give you your working heart rate band.

    Example

    165 subtract 45 = 120

    For different zones

    Say 60%

    120 x 0.6 = 72 + 45 (Resting HR) =117

    And 65%

    120 x 0.65 = 78 + 45 = 123 so 60-65% is 117-123 Bpm

    I may be wrong, If i am then please help!

  • Max HR will be different for different sports because muscle usage will be different AND presumably the fitness level of those muscles is different. Highly trained multisport athletes should have pretty close max HR on the different disciplines they train for.

  • "Give it all you have right through the 30-second burst. Do these for 6-8 weeks and marvel at the fat you’ve lost. Try it – it really works."

    Surely high intensity work burns carbs rather than fat? It's the long low intensity rides that will get you slim. hard efforts just make you strong!

  • Wow! A well written & more importantly useful article. Lets have more of them.

    As has been said each sport will have a different max HR - as you maximise your skills, strength & mucscle recruitment they may close but expect running to be 8-10bpm higher than cycling which should be around rhe same higher than swimming.

    Schmiken - this is an old misconception along with that of the "fat burning zone" touted by many gyms & fitness "experts". What happens is after your session when you eat the carbohydrate (60% of your energy input) will first try & replenish used glycogen & when that is done any remainder will be converted to & deposited as fat. Fat cannot be converted to glycogen. To the body a calorie is just a calorie (excluding thermogenesis etc) irrespective of where it is from. What really burns the calories is the EPOC (Excess Post-exercise Oxygen Consumption) also known as afterburn. Your metabolic rate is raised after exercise for several hours so burning more calories (largely fat if taking it easy) & the greater the intensity the higher the EPOC. The volume of the intensity is not necessarily as important as its level.

  • Do remember though that you can't compare heart rate from workout to workout due to the fluctuations in the environment: caffeine, stress, dehydration, time of day, sleep, training, rest, illness etc. Heart rate ONLY tells you how hard you are working, and says NOTHING about how you are performing. Only a power meter can tell you how you're performing because it's not affected by changes in the environment. The best way to 'see' how you're IMPROVING, when you can't afford an outdoor power meter, is to invest in a turbo trainer with power reading - this is the best way to test yourself and monitor how you're doing over time. So, take heart rate readings with a pinch of salt to give you a 'rough idea' of your intensity. As to LSD, yes going slow is the right focus, but also you need to be riding with good form - cadence needs to be high to train cycling efficiency - which is key once you start adding power later on...what's not right though is getting off the bike to walk for the sake of your hr - no no no! Ride the hills with FORM at all times and let hr follow - it's impossible to keep HR as slow as you mention because of hills and you can't avoid hills in cycling (well in most cases), so you have to work WITH them to become more efficient - so taking the av hr for the ride makes sense as it's your 'general overall' intensity that counts AND how you FEEL you performed - RPE is a very important intensity indicator and never to be ignored for the sake of a hr watch...anyway, great post and I enjoyed the read.

  • Why no mention of threshold HR? I thought your threshold is more important than maxHR when setting zones.

  • This article could have been written 15 years ago.

    Some good content but misses the mark!

  • If MHR depends on the activity why does 220 minus your age appear to be the universal formula - irrespective of your sport?

  • I enjoyed the article but find that the practice is somewhat more challenging as (for me) keeping below a 132BPM is almost impossible in the terrain where I live; I would be getting on and off the bike for every hill!

    I guess commen sense is required; stay in the treshold zone as much as possible and accept that when you hit a 1km 10% your HR is going to be banging on the door.

    I have also just tried out the 30 second sprint repeats (3 min spin between reps) and found it really good, the third of which my lungs and breakfast were virtually on the tarmac!

    I guess I will need to try this as I am seriously keen to improve my endurance with Ronde Van Vlanderen and Paris Roubaix due in April.

  • The maximum heart rate for women can be different. A 2010 published research paper determined that, for women, the maximum heart rate should be determined as 206 - 0.88*age. See summary here: http://www.northwestern.edu/newscenter/stories/2010/06/heartrate.html

    The paper is here: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/122/2/130

  • I tried this yesterday, plan was to keep to 130bpm, It was very difficult and you had to concentrate all the time. After nearly 4 hours riding i had covered 44 miles, avg hr was 135 which with the hills around the chilterns is not to bad, the longest hill after 40 miles was taken in bottom gear and hr peaked at 147. Having done this route previously this last hill nearly finished me off but even after losing fitness over winter yesterday it was a peice of cake, only problem was slow riding meant alot of riding with the hands on the top of the bars, resulting in more weight on the seat and a very tender a**e. Will keep trying and hopefully i will end up a lot fitter this year, as i am planning for much longer rides this year.

  • Interesting read.

    I have had a few days of actually paying attention to my heart rate more than my cadense and speed.

    I find it really hard to keep my heart rate around the 140 mark. I do have a little weight to loose so am willing to stick with it for a bit.

    Problem is when I get off the bike I feel like I have not really done much work and thats the bit I find hard...

    Will stick with it for a couple of weeks and see what happens.

  • I have tried it around richmond park this week and it is hard, especially the last couple of days it gets so cold after 2 laps... I do not see any harm in trying as I return to training properly, especially as last year no matter how hard i tried i could not get my 3 laps challenge under an hour (by just training 3 laps as hard as i could) i would not care if at the start of the season my laps were 23/24 mins... Such a small gain suggests another approach needed...

    One question I have is that while you are going into the next zone up the 2 hills per lap anyway, can we not go up a zone again and take hills as an interval???

  • I think it would have helped to include how many sessions of each type a week.

    I can see beginners trying to do intervals sessions every day of the week and that is fatal.

  • What is a good heart rate for warm-up?

  • I've tried this on the running machine the last few weeks, as it was easier to stick to a specific bpm (135 to 140). First session in one hour I covered 7.84 km (a really annoying pace between walk and run), then yesterday I covered 8.54 km. I'll be interested to see what distance I can work up to, but more than an hour eats into my dad time so...

  • I find these comments a little strange - surely you have all spent a couple of bob on one of the many excellent books on training? I go for the Carmichael ones, but it doesn't take more than a couple of hours reading to get the basics under your belt (max HR, zones, recovery, build, taper) and you pretty much make your own program from there. The what how and why isn't that hard it's the getting out on your bike bit that usually needs the work...

    Back in the bad old days (80s) before bike computers training was absolutely hit and miss, things are so much better now, but you still hear a lot of 80s (and before) crud talked about training. Spend some money on training books, a bike fit and some lights instead of those new carbon handle bars - then get out there!

  • I completely agree with the writer of this article about go slow to go fast. I learnt this from a book "Heart Rate Monitor |Training for the Compleat Idiot" by John L Parker. Initially I had to stop and walk on a 5 km run to keep the HR within the zone but after 5 weeks I was 10mins faster over 5km and my heart rate was still low!!! He also has cycling plans in the book as well. Use Karvonen method for working out target heart rates (Max HR - Resting HR) x Zone % / 100 + Resting HR and away you go. I always train this way and can see and feel when I am fitter

  • Enjoyed this article, have been training with a HR monitor for years. It is so difficult to stay within range of the day but well worth it. The point I would like to emphasize is finding the max HR. I'm 53 with a MAX of 194 it has been at this level for many years. if I was too have done any of the ways to calculate this. I would of been way off. Now my resting HR does change for many reasons rest, sleep, weight gain etc.

  • Hello everyone,

    The distance between my working place and home is 10.5 miles, 95% flat road(no hill in between). It takes me 56 minutes if I maintain my heart rate in Zone 2 (65-75% of MHR) and 46mins if I go as fast as I can(after a day of work). And I believe cycle to work can be a good way to train, but how can I use this 21miles(return) efficiently?

    Knowing that few hours in zone2 is a very efficient way to train. My questions are, will two set of one hour training work the same way or should I increase to zone3/4 due to the less training time?

    In short I have to do two 10.5 miles ride, 4 to 5 days every week. How should I do it to get the most result? Can you please suggest a plan to me?

    Thank you very much, any ideas will be most appreciated.

    Some background info of myself:

    I have been riding for around two summers only and I would love to do join some sport races in the coming summer.

    I am a slightly fat small rider: 165cm(5”5), 60kg(132lbs) and 23 years old. In the last two summers I did 50 miles XC or 25 miles AM ride once a week, but haven’t touch my bike much in the winter.

Post a Comment:

You need to login or register to post comments.