Feature

Fri 21 Nov, 1:00 pm UTC

Training: Homebrew fitness testing

By Alex Simmons, Associate Coach, RST

Key points

  • You can see if you're improving without any expensive equipment
  • Find a hill and time yourself up it
  • Do it every 6-8 weeks

Am I getting fitter?

You've just finished your local group run and thought: "I was really good today, I made those guys hurt" or maybe "I was struggling today, wow that was hard". Or perhaps it was something in between.  Maybe you completed your local time trial or favourite training circuit and your time was better or maybe not as good as last time.

So you are wondering, "I've been training OK but am I actually getting any fitter?"  

Rides like these can sometimes be false indicators of your fitness and form.  That's because fitness changes should only be assessed using an objective measure (the most objective measure being sustainable power output).  A group run or even a mass start race is measuring yourself against others, so who knows how their form is relative to yours?  And time trial or circuit times are significantly affected by weather conditions on the day, and changes in conditions affect different riders to different degrees so the time gaps between you and the other riders can also vary.

So how can you really know the answer, without investing in expensive equipment?

Simple. Go and find a hill to climb. Ride up as hard as you can and time yourself.  

There are a few tricks to making this a reasonably objective measure, but done right it can be a very useful guide for monitoring fitness changes and certainly more reliable than group rides and time trials.

Hill climbs are ideal for the purpose since, due to the physics of riding a bicycle, they reduce the influence of many of the uncontrollable variables that affect speed on flatter or variable terrain: wind and air density for instance. Hill climbing speed relies much more on the hill's gradient (which doesn't change each time you ride the same hill) your ability to generate power (which is what we want to know) and your weight (which is easy to measure).  Besides, hills are good training anyway, so why not?

Before you test yourself

Testing fitness is, by its nature, a very strenuous activity and as such it is very important that you are not suffering from any virus, infection or related illness, or have recovered fully from any such infection or illness (e.g. not within several weeks of such an episode).  Smokers, older (over 35 years) or overweight riders should all consult their medical practitioner for their OK before embarking on such activity.  And those who have high blood pressure, suffer heart and/or vascular disease or airway restriction diseases such as bronchitis should not attempt such efforts.  If in any doubt, consult a suitably qualified medical practitioner.

Finding a hill

Here are some guidelines on choosing a suitable hill climb:

  • The hill needs to be long. It is best if it will take at least 10-minutes to climb. 20 minutes or longer is better.
  • The hill needs to be reasonably steep.  By that I mean an average gradient of at least 5% and preferably 7% - 8%.  For example, a 7.5% gradient means ~75 metres of altitude gain for every kilometre of road (~400 feet of altitude gain per mile).  It also helps if the gradient is reasonably consistent.  Gradient variations are OK but flat and downhill segments reduce the reliability of results.
  • A sheltered climb is best. While climbing reduces the effect of weather conditions on the result, they still have an impact, so sheltered climbs are best.  The lesser the gradient, the more important this is.

If you're lucky enough to have such a hill within riding distance, then there are a few more points to note:

  • Have set start and end markers to time yourself against. Don't forget what and where they are for next time. Use well known markers that won't be removed next time you visit.
  • Avoid exceptionally windy days. While climbing reduces the influence of wind on your time, it still plays a part, so if it's unusually windy, perhaps it's not the best day for it.
  • Use the same bike set up each time. Make sure your carry-on load (mass of bidons, spares, stuff in pockets etc) is roughly the same. The only element of total mass that should vary is yourself.  And have gearing on your bike suitable for the climb.
  • Go as hard as you can but don't blast out of the blocks! Have a good warm up beforehand and ride yourself into the hill by being a littleconservative at the start.  Going too hard too early will result in being forced to slow dramatically in order to recover, before being able to lift the effort further. This won't give you your best time.
  • Do the test after 2-3 days of rest, easy or recovery riding.  Use the same routine in the days prior to the test each time.

Your hill climb time is a direct reflection of your power to weight ratio. A faster time means a higher ratio, and hence improved fitness.

Once you have a benchmark time, then you'll know next time whether you really are fitter.  By noting your own body weight each time, you be able to determine how much of that improvement is due to being leaner (or not) and how much is due to producing more (or less) power. It's best to do tests on a regular basis, every six to eight weeks is about right.

So, get out there, set a benchmark time and see if you can beat it after a block of training.  Otherwise, you may not really know how your form and fitness are progressing.

Sustainable power output

The most objective measure of cycling fitness is the power a rider can sustainably generate through the cranks of a bicycle.

Often (and most practically) this is expressed as the maximum average power a rider can generate for a given duration, e.g. ~ 1-hour.

An even better indicator is the ratio of sustainable power to body mass.  Hence a measure of one's power to weight ratio is typically used to rate fitness.  Normally this is expressed as watts per kilogram of body mass (W/kg).  This ratio is the primary determinant of one's ability to climb hills and mountains.  Top professional riders (e.g. leading climbers in the Tour de France) are producing power in the range of 6 W/kg for 20 minutes or more.

Sustainable power to weight ratio is also closely correlated with general cycling performance, although many other factors do come into play and their influence depends on the event type such as: aerodynamics for time trialling; anaerobic abilities, tactics, strategy, skills and experience for various other forms of racing; as well as overall endurance for long events.

So unless you have access to a sports science facility or are using an on-bike power meter such as a Powertap or an SRM, or a well calibrated cycling ergometer, then the next best thing is to time yourself riding up a hill climb.

Estimates of power output on a hill climb can be made by using a good on-line calculator. One of the best is Tom Compton's Analytic Cycling site.

User Comments

There are 10 comments on this post

Showing 1 - 10 of 10 comments

  • So the hill needs to be about 10 mins long & least 5%.........Wow we've all got one of those on our rides haven't we......errr no we haven't..........I haven't got anything like near me. I'll have to make do with my 3 mins on a 4% (estimated) then.

  • I have..... oh well, guess i live in a hilly/good area for mountainbiking.

  • You can still use a shorter climb, as any ride longer than a few minutes will still be predominantly aerobic in nature, however, the shorter the duration of effort, the more anaerobic energy production will potentially skew the results.

    That's important as one's anaerobic fitness can be quite variable and while important as "icing on the fitness cake", it is not the primary physiological determinant of performance in endurance cycling.

    Of course not everyone has such a hill near by. I was simply providing an option that reduces many of the variables and doesn't cost anything. Best option is using an on bike power meter (since you can test whenever you ride and on whatever terrain you have) or at a controlled testing environment such as a sports science facility.

  • Over 35 makes you an 'older' rider - blimey, how old are you? That's most cyclists visiting the doctor before they try a hill, then.

  • Just riding up a hill and doing so at maximal effort are two different things. It is prudent always to make sure one is up to maximally stressing themselves and if there is any doubt.....

    However if you have been riding for some time, are already fit and have done hard riding before, then the risk is pretty low. I will enjoy my 45th birthday next time round. I perform maximal effort tests quite regularly and have done so for many, many years. I also coach riders up to 65 years old who are also OK to perform such efforts. In each case though, I make sure they have the medical clearance to do so.

    As always, each case on its individual merits.

  • I also test my fitness on hills but do not have any long climbs in my area. I do intervals on a shorter sprinters type hill in a set gear. When I am fit I can do 6 without loosing any momentum going over the top. You know when its over because you can't maintain speed going over the top or can't stay on top of the gear. No timing needed your body will tell you when it is over.

  • I think that cycling in a BIG headwind is an alternative if there's no hills around your area. I used to draft behind busses every time there was a headwind when I was out training but it defeated the whole point of "training". Now I try and actively seek out the headwinds because they give a similar sensation to hill-climbing.

  • Nice guidelines for a fitness test.

    An all out time trial would give same results.

    AMR

  • Thanks.

    Times trial are excellent tests but best if one has a power meter (and the point of the articles was to be able to provide a reliable means of testing sans power meter).

    The problem with using Time Trials as a fitness test (without reference to a power meter) is the time to complete a set course can be significantly impacted by the conditions on the day and so a faster or slower time is not necessarily a good indicator of fitness changes. Indeed it may well be a false indicator.

    As an example, I have a 10-mile loop TT course I often use as a fitness testing ground. I have ridden it at the same power but the time varied by well over a minute, simply because the conditions were different.

    I also have a client who's time over an out and back TT course was 30-seconds slower than the previous month. He thought he was going backwards until he realised his power was up quite a bit and it was the conditions that caused his time to be slower and not his form/fitness.

    That's the point of using a hillclimb. It siginificantly reduces the impact of environmental variables when conducting tests and brings it back to two things that are easy to measure. Duration and weight.

  • There was an excellent article about this topic written by Johnattan Vaughters in cyclesport (oct 2001). There he actually gives a way to estimate your power output based on meters climbed, time needed and your weight. This way i compare my perfomance on different hills i climb.

    In short you multiply vertical meters climbed by mass (you plus bike plus clothes...) by 10 and divide this by total time in seconds. This is power needed to get you up the hill. In order to fight drag (wind and rolling resistance) you add another 50 watts for speeds of 15kph and you get a rough estimate of your power.

  • 1

Post comment:

You need to login or register to post comments.

Also on BikeRadar