Commuting General Forum

The new bike gadgetry thread
Go to page 1, 2  Next
 
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BikeRadar Forum Index > Commuting > Commuting General
Author Message
lost_in_thought
For the discerning folk of the commuting forum I propose this new gadgetry:

http://www.flybikesbmx.com/en/news/post_1001

Sure, it's for BMX, but your thoughts? It's quite clever...

FCN 7/1
Viner Maxima, Tifosi CK7, Giant Bowery, Old commuter.
Send private message
JonGinge
Ooh. SS/FGers will never need their 15mm spanner again...

FCN 2-4 "Keep it going!", "I got nothing"
Planet-x Scott
Rides
Send private message
Wallace1492
Indeed, quite clever, but what is the performance level? I mean, is it better than a full tube? Can see benefit in races though.... could be good as a spare when on the road, but how much time will it really save.

Kona Caldera - nobblies back on
Specialised Tricross - rack mudguards and panniers

FCN : 9/7

"Encyclopaedia is a fetish for very small bicycles"
Send private message
JonGinge
So, these have caught my eye over the last couple of months. I don't need either but...

Cute power meter:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/on-show-interbike-2009-part-15
http://www.metrigear.com/products/

Garmin 500:
https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=160&pID=36728
It's like the 705 (but no mapping), only much smaller. Think of the aero gains...

FCN 2-4 "Keep it going!", "I got nothing"
Planet-x Scott
Rides
Send private message
moonio
lost_in_thought wrote:
For the discerning folk of the commuting forum I propose this new gadgetry:

http://www.flybikesbmx.com/en/news/post_1001

Sure, it's for BMX, but your thoughts? It's quite clever...


I've used a similar tube on my bike, you used to be able to get them from Halfords, they were fine to use and really quick to change etc

Here they are

http://www.sjscycles.co.uk/product-SJSC-Sidewinder-Easy-Fit-endless-Inner-tube--for-24-and-26-inch-wheels-11126.htm

Send private message
spasypaddy
JonGinge wrote:
So, these have caught my eye over the last couple of months. I don't need either but...

Cute power meter:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/on-show-interbike-2009-part-15
http://www.metrigear.com/products/

Garmin 500:
https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=160&pID=36728
It's like the 705 (but no mapping), only much smaller. Think of the aero gains...

well thats me probably getting that power meter then...

Planet X (Geared) - FCN 3
Premier (fixed/SS) - FCN 3
Send private message
WheezyMcChubby
Re Those tubes

I must be having an especially slow day as it took a while to figure out what the big deal was Embarassed

Presumably the wheel still needs to come off to remove a traditional style tube from the wheel

Or have I got this totally wrong?

Commute in winter hibernation

Weekend Leisure Cyclist

http://www.startfarm.co.uk/scstats/index.php
Send private message
Aidy
I've always wondered why there wasn't a tube with a break in it.
I've been half tempted to bodge one every now and then, just to see if it would work.

The whole linking thing is clever, though. However, I'm still not sure it's entirely necessary - I reckon pressure and expansion of a closed end tube would be sufficient to stop any nastiness of uneven inflation.

Send private message
Aidy
WheezyMcChubby wrote:
Presumably the wheel still needs to come off to remove a traditional style tube from the wheel

Or have I got this totally wrong?


If you were in a rush, you'd just cut it.

Send private message
ride_whenever
if you don't link the ends, then the rotation of the tyre will cause the tube to process a lot.

----------------------------------------------

456!
silly little bike
Send private message
Aidy
ride_whenever wrote:
if you don't link the ends, then the rotation of the tyre will cause the tube to process a lot.


Do you mean precess?

I don't see why it would affect an unjoined tube any more than it would a joined tube.

Send private message
JonGinge
ride_whenever wrote:
if you don't link the ends, then the rotation of the tyre will cause the tube to process a lot.
I concur*. Ever ridden for a while with a flat tube? I'm not sure pressure alone would keep it in place.

* not about the spelling

FCN 2-4 "Keep it going!", "I got nothing"
Planet-x Scott
Rides
Send private message
Aidy
JonGinge wrote:
ride_whenever wrote:
if you don't link the ends, then the rotation of the tyre will cause the tube to process a lot.
I concur*. Ever ridden for a while with a flat tube? I'm not sure pressure alone would keep it in place.

* not about the spelling


... but surely that backs it up, if anything.

It precesses with a flat tube because the pressure isn't keeping it in place. Despite the fact that it's a unbroken circular tube.

However, that example does bring up a good point. What happens if you get a sudden puncture with an unjoined tube? I'd suspect it would be all kinds of bad.

Send private message
ride_whenever
Yes, sorry 2 hours sleep and been up since 6 Shocked

In a joined tube it does happen but the tension keeps it to a minimum, if you had a non fixed end (ie without the valve) it would rapidly work back round because of the tension in the rubber, and the rotational direction.

----------------------------------------------

456!
silly little bike
Send private message
moonio
mine had overlapping ends

Send private message
shouldbeinbed
Halfords sacked them as they didn't prove popular. TBH this one seems as faffy as a couple of seconds with the spanner to pop the wheel off and put a standard tube on.

FCN 7 & 9
Send private message
Aidy
shouldbeinbed wrote:
Halfords sacked them as they didn't prove popular. TBH this one seems as faffy as a couple of seconds with the spanner to pop the wheel off and put a standard tube on.


My pondering was mainly based off of having played with hub gears.

Hopping the rear wheel off a hub geared bike to change the tube is completely the biggest pain in the posterior.

Send private message
don_don
Convenient, but tubeless is the way forward. Inner tubes are anachronistic pieces of junk that deserve extinction. IMHO...

I miss the Elephant signatures Sad
Send private message
shouldbeinbed
Aidy wrote:
shouldbeinbed wrote:
Halfords sacked them as they didn't prove popular. TBH this one seems as faffy as a couple of seconds with the spanner to pop the wheel off and put a standard tube on.


My pondering was mainly based off of having played with hub gears.

Hopping the rear wheel off a hub geared bike to change the tube is completely the biggest pain in the posterior.


I ride on an Alfine hub, changing the rear is a piece of P***

lever off 1 side of the tyre and pull the dead tube completely out

undo the nuts and lift the wheel just enough to slip the tube over the axle and past the dropouts same for slipping the new tube in.

put the wheel back in place and tighten the nuts again,

feed the new tube onto the rim, remount the 1 side of the tyre

inflate and away.

I've never had a pinch puncture after replacing like this and can change a tube and be on my way in a few minutes.

and all without the joys of getting oily from unhooking deraillures

FCN 7 & 9
Send private message
ride_whenever
don_don wrote:
Convenient, but tubeless is the way forward. Inner tubes are anachronistic pieces of junk that deserve extinction. IMHO...



+600000000000000000000000

it's awesome, going to convert my pompino when i get new wheels for it, and do my ss xc bike when the spokes arrive!

----------------------------------------------

456!
silly little bike
Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BikeRadar Forum Index > Commuting > Commuting General All times are GMT
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
BikeRadar topic RSS feed 



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group