MTB General Forum

Hydraulic Gears?
Go to page 1, 2  Next
 
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BikeRadar Forum Index > Mountain bike > MTB General
Author Message
Kiblams
Just had an odd thought, why do't we have hydraulic gears in the same way as brakes? Confused

Or is this something that was tried and didn't take off during my break from biking?

Still riding in the 90s

What I ride for work
What I ride for fun
Send private message
supersonicLives Here
We do Wink

Not very common though.

Zaskar LE 1996
Zaskar Carbon Team
MYSPACE
Send private message
Sarnian
I can't remember who brought It out but there was a air shifter and gears around In the mid 90's

Send private message
ramemtbers
clever ideas but i guess it costs a tonne.

you dont have to hug trees 2 be green but it helps severly

"i can cook. it just so happens i know how to drive a microwave aswell"

www.ramemtbers.webs.com
Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
geordiefreerider
There are systems available (I remember thinking the same thing 5 years ago), but they cost a fortune, there is also an electrically operated system by shimano.

http://photos-d.ak.fbcdn.net/photos-ak-snc1/v2630/81/66/889620505/n889620505_6415555_230783.jpg
Send private message
blakef111
Sarnian wrote:
I can't remember who brought It out but there was a air shifter and gears around In the mid 90's
shimano airlines, DH specific though


geordiefreerider wrote:
There are systems available (I remember thinking the same thing 5 years ago), but they cost a fortune, there is also an electrically operated system by shimano.
shimano dura ace di2


My girls (updated!) : Sabrina -Persephone-Tamara
Send private message
jay12
geordiefreerider wrote:
There are systems available (I remember thinking the same thing 5 years ago), but they cost a fortune, there is also an electrically operated system by shimano.

that dura ace though and the front mech costs over £500 and rear something like £800

92% of teenagers have turned to rap. If your one of the 8% that still listens to real music put this in your sig.

Current Bike: 04 Raleigh Alona
New bike in 2010: Can't wait
Send private message MSN Messenger
redvee
Shimano did the air shifters called Airlines. Pic on Flickr

http://www.flickr.com/photos/cycleologist/2038980300/

Can't find no tech docs though.

IIRC Hope did hydraulic shifting, a normal shifter pulling cable through a hydraulic acuator and the reverse set-up at the rear mech.

Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
blakef111
Kiblams wrote:
Just had an odd thought, why do't we have hydraulic gears in the same way as brakes? Confused

Or is this something that was tried and didn't take off during my break from biking?


a german company i believe


My girls (updated!) : Sabrina -Persephone-Tamara
Send private message
jairaj
So how come hydraulic gears aren't popular then? Did they not offer many pro's over a easier to maintain cable system?

Also, does that rear mech above only have one jockey wheel or am I missing out on something?

Confused

Send private message
nicklouseLives Here
it has 2.

why would you want hydro gears?


the ROT5 set up is very expensive.

a wire and a spring works very well and weighs less.

there have also been cable activated hydro builds but they did not take off.

"Do not follow where the path may lead, Go instead where there is no path, and Leave a Trail."
Parktools Question SheldonBrown
Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
R+P+K
If it ain't broke, don't fix it?

Send private message
bomberesque
nicklouse wrote:
why would you want hydro gears?


why would we want any new product? It's an eternal question, 20 years ago when a 35mm suspension fork weighed >2kg and cost 500 quid we wondered why we want suspension on a mountainbike, today front suspension is all but ubiquitous.

That said, I doubt that the evolution of gearing systems will lay down the path of the rear and front deurallier and even if I'm wrong about that I doubt that hydraulic would be the way. There would have to be so much R&D behind it to get it to a level where it could compete cost and weight wise (as you point out nick) with current spring/cable systems and the fact that the big boys don't seem interested (as you also point out, something hand hewn in some German guy's shed will always be bloody expensive) I suggest means that theyve either got a better idea (Gboxes) or they've looked, thought "nahhh" and plan to stick with cable gearing systems.

The motor actuated electronic shifting of the new Shimano group reminds me of the experiment Mavic did with RF shifters about 15 years back. That didn't take off and I kinda doubt that this will either. It's too expensive (OK that will change if they ramp up production) and I can't think that it competes weight wise with an equivalent cable actuated road group (although I've not looked)

I did see an article somewhere about a hydraulic drivetrain though (replacing the chain with a hydraulic pump), that was a bonkers idea

Personally I rekon frame mounted gearbox based on Alfine type tech with belt drive but then gain maybe we'll continue using Deore till the sun implodes, they're built well enough to last that long

Everything in moderation ... except beer
Beer in moderation ... is a waste of beer

If riding an XC race bike is like touching the trail,
then riding a rigid singlespeed is like licking it
... or being punched by it, depending on the day
Send private message
yoohoo999
bomberesque wrote:
nicklouse wrote:
why would you want hydro gears?


why would we want any new product?


I agree.

I'm extremely grateful for those who do continually look to new ways to improve existing products. If we all took the view that what we have at the moment can't be improved, innovation and progress would skid to a rather unattractive halt.

I get to work alongside some hugely talented people from various fields of engineering and I'm always staggered by the amount of energy they have to continually improve something that they only just finished improving the day before.

MTB is a very competitive market (although still not as competitive as it could be) and companies spend a heck of a lot of time and money improving existing products and developing new technologies just to retain market share and see a return on all that R&D.

I don't for one minute imagine the response from the lead innovators at Shimano/SRAM was "why would you want hydro gears?" when the potential of such a product was discussed. It would more likely be "well, let's see if it can work and if the benefits are worth the additional cost/weight/silly colour etc".

I agree that the absence of hydro gears in the mainstream tells us a lot about the likely results of those studies/tests.........they don't offer much better performance over cable given the additional cost/maintenance/weight/reliability etc. But we can only guess, unless of course you happen to be on the board of Shimano or SRAM Very Happy

I remember thinking that V brakes were mindblowing when they came out. My old canit's suddenly looked positively stupid. Then when disc brakes became available to the masses, I thought, "what was the point in having a rim brake at all! What a silly idea when you could have something connected to your hub!"

But even disc brakes in their current incarnation have evolved over time. The same will happen with most components on our bikes over the next decade.

Perhaps hydro gears will never be a viable solution to shifting, but the culmination of all the efforts of the engineers trying (and failing to a certain degree) to develop those ideas will generally lead to the best solution, or lend its technolgy to other areas of the sport.

The big one for me is when someone will get their greasy finger out and develop a decent remote dropping post!!! Very Happy Then I'm sure we will all be laughing at the likes of the Joplin/Command Post/KS etc when we see how useless they really are. Oh wait a minute, we are laughing at their inability to work now! Laughing

Send private message Send e-mail
sarkmeister
The only advantage I could ever see in hydraulic gears is if they could make it lighter than cables.

Brakes are generally better hydraulic because of the increased modulation of the force exerted on the lever. A gear shift is a more finite and simple movement, which can be transmitted quite easily by a cable.

Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Paul 8v
Mavic did an electric system called Zap years ago, I think Chris Boardman used it in one of the Tour De France's

Send private message
stevieboy
Could this forum really handle the extra traffic caused by "my gears are spongy" posts?

It's bad enough with brakes Laughing

Cable is fine, electric would be a luxury, hydraulic would be a PITA for the everyday mtb'er

Plus poor Nicklouse having to wade through endless posts......

Scott Scale Custom
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v496/stevewood/DSC09729.jpg

Kona Coilair 2007 Dark Peak Destroyer
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v496/stevewood/DSC09727.jpg

"BOCD - If it aint perfect it aint good enough"
Send private message
daniel_owen_uk
The lack of cable stretch when using hydraulic gears would surely be an advantage?

Send private message
nicklouseLives Here
daniel_owen_uk wrote:
The lack of cable stretch when using hydraulic gears would surely be an advantage?


maybe but would it out weigh the problems inherent with a two way hydraulic system?

the problems most users seem to have with hydro brakes says no.

this idea has been around for circa 5 years now has there been a rush to buy it? like there is with the XTR and X0 kit?

bust a hose and you have problems with a "standard" mech there are trail fixes.

"Do not follow where the path may lead, Go instead where there is no path, and Leave a Trail."
Parktools Question SheldonBrown
Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
stevieboy
If you store your bike correctly (i.e. in the right gear combo), how often does cable stretch really become an issue?

At most I think I give my barrels a quarter turn once a month (400-500 miles).

Scott Scale Custom
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v496/stevewood/DSC09729.jpg

Kona Coilair 2007 Dark Peak Destroyer
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v496/stevewood/DSC09727.jpg

"BOCD - If it aint perfect it aint good enough"
Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BikeRadar Forum Index > Mountain bike > MTB General All times are GMT
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
BikeRadar topic RSS feed 



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group