Cleat Eastwood wrote:simple questions asked but never answered - only those of a closed mind would not have even the smallest of doubts - as was mentioned above - and i just googled this to see if it was true -why no mention of the largest terrorist attack on US soil on bin ladens fbi wanted profile
"Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998, bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. These attacks killed over 200 people. In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world."
Oh look it is true - well waddya make of that then.
I'm not sure it's closed minded to read what someone says, consider it and then dismiss it as rubbish. There must be at least an element of credibility to someone's alternative theory before you could be said to be closed minded by dismissing it out of hand. And, frankly, the idea that the death of 3000 of their own people was deliberately orchestrated by the US Government with so far only some minor inconsistencies to contradict the official version of events DOES seem like rubbish. I don't feel duty bound to "research" that in much depth to reach that conclusion, mainly because the basic premise is so lacking in credbility to start with.
By way of a contrast, both the Spanish and Italian secret services carried out terrorist attacks on their own people in the 1970s/80s as a way of provoking sufficient public outrage to justify harsher measures in their fight against Basque/Left wing terror groups (ETA and Brigade Rosso). Same premise, same motivation and both efforts were eventually uncovered with ensuing public scandals etc.
I very very strongly doubt that trying to do something on the size and scale of 9/11 could be orchestrated and then successfully covered up by any government in the world regardless of the level of resources/Illuminati involvement/Elvis's blessing/whatever available to them. I just dont. As a result, people who DO think that come across (to me) as embarassingly credulous and lacking in judgement. Because their theories are SUCH OBVIOUS NONSENSE. Not because I'm being closed minded and I'm pretty sure the same applies to the guy you're quoting.