Strava & Calories. How accurate?

General bike chat that does not fit elsewhere
User avatar
Bluedoggy
Posts: 457
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 21:24 pm
Contact:

Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby Bluedoggy » Mon Nov 26, 2012 23:03 pm

Curious to know how accurate Strava is concerning the calories burned after a ride? Did I REALLY burn 600 calories after that 15 mile ride?
Boardman team carbon 2013http://www.paulgreenwoodart.com

danowat
Posts: 2830
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 13:58 pm

Re: Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby danowat » Tue Nov 27, 2012 06:36 am

Usually, without a power meter, not very.

If you base your cal consumption on about 600-700 an hour at top end of endurance level, that's not far off

User avatar
Bluedoggy
Posts: 457
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 21:24 pm
Contact:

Re: Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby Bluedoggy » Tue Nov 27, 2012 09:46 am

So it probably was 300 calories - not 600. I'm not at the top end endurance level but here in the Bath Area you get a good work out with all the undulating hills. Interesting. And I was thinking I was burning what it said. Ultimately it doesn't really matter because I've got much, much fitter and lighter.
Boardman team carbon 2013http://www.paulgreenwoodart.com

User avatar
Herbsman
Posts: 1940
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 18:31 pm

Re: Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby Herbsman » Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:05 am

I think there is a 50% margin of error.

How can it know whether you're riding at 14mph because you're doing a recovery ride, or because you're pushing hard into a headwind?

How can it know you're not sheltering behind six other cyclists when you're doing 24mph?
CAPTAIN BUCKFAST'S CYCLING TIPS - GUARANTEED TO WORK! 1 OUT OF 10 RACING CYCLISTS AGREE!

User avatar
Bluedoggy
Posts: 457
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 21:24 pm
Contact:

Re: Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby Bluedoggy » Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:34 am

Apart from the Hugely expensive power meters, what device can give a better reading?
Boardman team carbon 2013http://www.paulgreenwoodart.com

danowat
Posts: 2830
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 13:58 pm

Re: Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby danowat » Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:41 am

Nothing, without knowing how much work you are doing, you can only guess, even a HRM doesn't know how much work you are doing, just how fast your heart is beating.

User avatar
Bluedoggy
Posts: 457
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 21:24 pm
Contact:

Re: Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby Bluedoggy » Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:51 am

So what is the consensus about reading a Strava calorie workout and eating? Do you simply read it as 50% and go with that as a best bet?
Boardman team carbon 2013http://www.paulgreenwoodart.com

User avatar
Bobbinogs
Posts: 3997
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 19:52 pm

Re: Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby Bobbinogs » Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:03 am

Bluedoggy wrote:So what is the consensus about reading a Strava calorie workout and eating? Do you simply read it as 50% and go with that as a best bet?


I eat the quantity of food I feel is right and don't rely on a webpage to advise me how much :)

danowat
Posts: 2830
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 13:58 pm

Re: Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby danowat » Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:05 am

It's about 25% over for me vs my power meter

User avatar
Bluedoggy
Posts: 457
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 21:24 pm
Contact:

Re: Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby Bluedoggy » Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:16 am

Bobbinogs wrote:
Bluedoggy wrote:So what is the consensus about reading a Strava calorie workout and eating? Do you simply read it as 50% and go with that as a best bet?


I eat the quantity of food I feel is right and don't rely on a webpage to advise me how much :)


I would totally agree and probably the best way. But i have to say those webpages you comment on have given me a 'Helping hand' along the way and made a huge difference to my well being. And now i don't use them as gospel. :wink:
Boardman team carbon 2013http://www.paulgreenwoodart.com

AchillesLeftKnee
Posts: 710
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 21:02 pm

Re: Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby AchillesLeftKnee » Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:16 am

Bluedoggy wrote:So what is the consensus about reading a Strava calorie workout and eating? Do you simply read it as 50% and go with that as a best bet?

My theory...

Calorie balance on the day is (more or less )... intake - BMR - exercise - other = net.

The problem with that is intake's very hard to measure accurately unless you have a remarkably controlled diet, unless there's a lab handy you're not going to know what the body's doing with it anyway, BMR's a guess unless there's a lab handy, exercise is (for the most part) another guess, and "other" is a total and utter punt that can vary by as much as the sum of the other parts depending on line of work. Consequently, actually trying to put all the elements together to get a useable number is probably beyond most people.

However, what isn't beyond most people is weighing themselves regularly, and getting dressed, then assessing the results and taking the appropriate action ("eat less\more and do less\more exercise, delete as appropriate"). In other words, it's probably best to just change behaviour based on observed results because they're the only part of the equation that stands a chance of being accurate.
Mangeur

User avatar
amaferanga
Posts: 6595
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 16:44 pm

Re: Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby amaferanga » Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:18 am

danowat wrote:It's about 25% over for me vs my power meter


Unlikely to be similar for everyone though obviously.
More problems but still living....

danowat
Posts: 2830
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 13:58 pm

Re: Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby danowat » Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:22 am

amaferanga wrote:
danowat wrote:It's about 25% over for me vs my power meter


Unlikely to be similar for everyone though obviously.


Obviously, and I wouldn't say a power meter is 100% accurate anyway............

User avatar
Bluedoggy
Posts: 457
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 21:24 pm
Contact:

Re: Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby Bluedoggy » Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:31 am

AchillesLeftKnee wrote:
Bluedoggy wrote:So what is the consensus about reading a Strava calorie workout and eating? Do you simply read it as 50% and go with that as a best bet?

My theory...

Calorie balance on the day is (more or less )... intake - BMR - exercise - other = net.

The problem with that is intake's very hard to measure accurately unless you have a remarkably controlled diet, unless there's a lab handy you're not going to know what the body's doing with it anyway, BMR's a guess unless there's a lab handy, exercise is (for the most part) another guess, and "other" is a total and utter punt that can vary by as much as the sum of the other parts depending on line of work. Consequently, actually trying to put all the elements together to get a useable number is probably beyond most people.

However, what isn't beyond most people is weighing themselves regularly, and getting dressed, then assessing the results and taking the appropriate action ("eat less\more and do less\more exercise, delete as appropriate"). In other words, it's probably best to just change behaviour based on observed results because they're the only part of the equation that stands a chance of being accurate.


+1 for that! Common sense in other words??
Boardman team carbon 2013http://www.paulgreenwoodart.com

AchillesLeftKnee
Posts: 710
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 21:02 pm

Re: Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby AchillesLeftKnee » Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:52 pm

Bluedoggy wrote:+1 for that! Common sense in other words??

Yep, pretty much common sense and trusting reality.

The whole calorie counting thing bugs me because it reminds me very much of the way some (not all) people end up treating systems (I'm a programmer). The statement "if the model\process is correct, and the inputs are accurate, then the model\process represents reality" ends up as "if the model\process is correct, and the inputs are accurate, then the model\process represents reality" in their minds, which leads to either poor assumptions regarding the future, or (more amusingly) the assertion that reality is, in fact, wrong.
Mangeur

James H-S
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 07:04 am

Re: Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby James H-S » Tue Nov 27, 2012 15:10 pm

Herbsman wrote:I think there is a 50% margin of error.

How can it know whether you're riding at 14mph because you're doing a recovery ride, or because you're pushing hard into a headwind?

How can it know you're not sheltering behind six other cyclists when you're doing 24mph?


From your heart rate if you have a monitor on?

User avatar
T.M.H.N.E.T
Posts: 2337
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 15:20 pm

Re: Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby T.M.H.N.E.T » Tue Nov 27, 2012 15:18 pm

AchillesLeftKnee wrote:
Bluedoggy wrote:+1 for that! Common sense in other words??

Yep, pretty much common sense and trusting reality.

The whole calorie counting thing bugs me because it reminds me very much of the way some (not all) people end up treating systems (I'm a programmer). The statement "if the model\process is correct, and the inputs are accurate, then the model\process represents reality" ends up as "if the model\process is correct, and the inputs are accurate, then the model\process represents reality" in their minds, which leads to either poor assumptions regarding the future, or (more amusingly) the assertion that reality is, in fact, wrong.


You make a choice as to which method you trust.

"Eat less - move more" a pretty baseless statement that offers zero insight.(which as far as I'm concerned,the people who offer this advice should be repeatedly slapped with their own hands)

Or BMR X activity - deficit. A number which can be changed - a number which will change relative to you.

I use the latter, to an extent of 5st loss over a certain period. Happily maintaining the weight I am now, losing more isn't a rush job.

And I have never counted a single calorie in that time(in the context that the phrase is paraded around)

James H-S wrote:
Herbsman wrote:I think there is a 50% margin of error.

How can it know whether you're riding at 14mph because you're doing a recovery ride, or because you're pushing hard into a headwind?

How can it know you're not sheltering behind six other cyclists when you're doing 24mph?


From your heart rate if you have a monitor on?

Your heart rate measured in Beats Per Minute, cannot tell you these things. It can tell you how fast your heart is beating.

Heart rate for example cannot tell the difference between 2hrs cycling and 2hrs lifting heavy things in a gym. Both activities will have grossly different calorie expenditure.

User avatar
Bluedoggy
Posts: 457
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 21:24 pm
Contact:

Re: Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby Bluedoggy » Tue Nov 27, 2012 15:42 pm

So in a nutshell then, just forget about counting calories, ride well and eat sensibly. :D

So if Strava and others are so hugely inaccurate why are they built in then? Who does it benefit and what does it tell you :|
Boardman team carbon 2013http://www.paulgreenwoodart.com

bobbydazzla
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby bobbydazzla » Tue Nov 27, 2012 20:42 pm

I used the myfitnesspal app to monitor calorie intake and exercise for a month. I already had a pretty healthy diet but using the app gave me a better understanding of what I was eating and allowed me change my diet slightly to see positive results e.g. salad rather than sandwich at lunch, porridge for breakfast not sugary cereals etc

I'm naturally very slim so wanted to maintain the same weight rather than lose a significant amount, plus I wanted to make sure I was eating the right foods at the right time to allow me to cycle long distances.

I found it to be a really useful exercise and it's given me a good framework of what foods to eat if I want to stay slim and healthy. And now I don't need to use the app anymore, I just trust my own judgement.

User avatar
Bluedoggy
Posts: 457
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 21:24 pm
Contact:

Re: Strava & Calories. How accurate?

Postby Bluedoggy » Tue Nov 27, 2012 20:54 pm

bobbydazzla wrote:I used the myfitnesspal app to monitor calorie intake and exercise for a month. I already had a pretty healthy diet but using the app gave me a better understanding of what I was eating and allowed me change my diet slightly to see positive results e.g. salad rather than sandwich at lunch, porridge for breakfast not sugary cereals etc

I'm naturally very slim so wanted to maintain the same weight rather than lose a significant amount, plus I wanted to make sure I was eating the right foods at the right time to allow me to cycle long distances.

I found it to be a really useful exercise and it's given me a good framework of what foods to eat if I want to stay slim and healthy. And now I don't need to use the app anymore, I just trust my own judgement.


+1
That app and cycling and the weight dropped off. I did use Strava calories with this so even though Strava is not honest with calories, it worked for me. So the original question of mine sort of worked for me?
Boardman team carbon 2013http://www.paulgreenwoodart.com


Return to “Road General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dazz_ni45, guy.spartacus, Rolf F and 6 guests