Bike geometry/sizing.

Got a general MTB question that doesn't fit anywhere else? Here's the place.
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 20:14 pm

Bike geometry/sizing.

Postby lbalony » Sun Feb 24, 2013 20:16 pm


Could do with some advice from someone in the know about the above subject. I am after a mid 90s Raleigh M-TRAX Frame. But the problem is the sizing. I am currently a 17inch on a current day hardtail but I am sure bikes used to be different. i.e. Non-sloping top tubes.

Do I just go for the size I roughly am or do I get a bigger size?


P.S. Anyone know of anyone with a M-TRAX? :D

User avatar
Posts: 8689
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 18:05 pm

Re: Bike geometry/sizing.

Postby Thewaylander » Sun Feb 24, 2013 20:31 pm

Not that's still in one piece!

Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 15:25 pm

Re: Bike geometry/sizing.

Postby LJ. » Mon Feb 25, 2013 13:22 pm

I had a raleigh activator 2 that was 18" my brother had a MAX a couple of years later same size, my 18" frame now is much bigger than those, I would say 20" at least. I have an old raleigh 22" bike in the garden with the straight tube and that is similar size to the 18"

Return to “MTB General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests