Crankset question

New to Cycling? Want some advice? Start here...
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 00:31 am

Crankset question

Postby nkerkham » Mon Feb 25, 2013 01:00 am

Hi guys

Im new to these forums so ill post as much info as i can.

I have a Tiagra crankset on my CAAD4 that i want to upgrade and I am after some advice on what would be a good upgrade for this crankset ?

The guy who had the bike before me said he put at 27/12 cassette on it. The front derailluer is a FD-4400 and rear derailleur is a 105.

Ideally id like to upgrade to a 105 or better ?

I'm happy to provide more information and model numbers if required. Just might little a little nudge to find where they are. :)

Thanks for your help

Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 00:31 am

Re: Crankset question

Postby nkerkham » Mon Feb 25, 2013 07:10 am

OK, got home and got some more details.

Crankset is Tiagra 170 FC-4400/4403 - Looking for a good replacement for this ?
Chainrings are 9 speed 39/52 - Does a new crank set come with chain rings ?
Rear mech is a RD-5500 and front mech is a FD-4400

Any recommendations on upgrades for this crank set ?

Is it possible to keep to a good 9 speed or is everything 10 speed these days ?

Posts: 2806
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 20:46 pm

Re: Crankset question

Postby jibberjim » Mon Feb 25, 2013 07:29 am

I'd say there's no value at all in upgrading that crankset. It's above the minimum required to do whatever you want it to do.
Jibbering Sports Stuff:

User avatar
Posts: 5256
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 20:52 pm

Re: Crankset question

Postby smidsy » Mon Feb 25, 2013 08:02 am

No real noticable gains to be made with cranksets. I have the very same chainset on my CAAD5.

You can get 39/52, that is a standard double.

You can also get 34/50, which is a compact, but this would need the FD moving. It makes it easier up hills (if you struggle with that).

Very difficult to get 9 speed but 10 speed cranksets will work fine.

In summary - if it works wait till it wears out, then get a new one.
Last edited by smidsy on Tue Feb 26, 2013 14:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Yellow is the new Black.

User avatar
Posts: 2809
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:10 am

Re: Crankset question

Postby wishitwasallflat » Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:05 am

+1 general consensus (rare in this world) is that crankset is one of the least (least?) worthwhile upgrades giving very little if any benefit - keep what you have and spend the money elsewhere (new tyres, wheels etc will show more direct benefits unless you are already at top spec there - in which case buy for bling :D ).

Posts: 8712
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 09:46 am

Re: Crankset question

Postby keef66 » Mon Feb 25, 2013 16:00 pm

You seem to be using the term crankset but describing the whole drivetrain. The crankset is generally taken to mean the cranks, chainrings and bottom bracket.

Bottom bracket bearings wear out, as do the chainrings, but either can be replaced without buying a new crankset. The other bits that wear out are the chain and the cassette, and periodically the cables will need replacing.

As mentioned above, if it's all working, it's an expensive and unneccessary job to replace the whole lot. If however you have the cash and want new, shiny matched parts, go for it!

Simon Masterson
Posts: 2489
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 15:52 pm

Re: Crankset question

Postby Simon Masterson » Mon Feb 25, 2013 18:21 pm

Upgrading cranksets is a waste of money unless you are changing crank length, changing from standard double to compact or vice versa, or opting for asymmetrical chainrings (which admittedly fit on standard cranksets). Even carbon ones are generally not much lighter than their metal counterparts.

As for the transmission as a whole, this is often a waste of money as well. Derailleurs, cranks and cogs are very simple things and will only vary so much. As they get more expensive you should get slightly smoother performance (though that will depend on how well the bike is maintained!) and a little lighter. It will cost you a lot of money in relative terms but it won't make you any faster (though this is generally the case with equipment upgrades), and - though this is not the case all the time by any means - the frame and wheels may only be as good as the parts that are on it. Putting expensive bits on a cheap frame with cheap wheels is a bit pointless.

Posts: 3871
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 22:10 pm

Re: Crankset question

Postby Danlikesbikes » Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:45 pm

Tend to agree that unless you are looking at changing the BB, the crank length is not to your liking or you are looking to change from/to a compact then very little point in changing.

The only exception would be to more to asymmetrical which I did as an upgrade which was cheaper to change the whole crankset as the old one went on the winter bike in my case.
Pain hurts much less if its topped off with beating your mates to top of a climb.

Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 00:31 am

Re: Crankset question

Postby nkerkham » Wed Feb 27, 2013 03:29 am

Sweet guys, thanks for the info, i think ill keep it until she dies !

Return to “Road Beginners”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests