Gear Browser

SRAM Apex road groupset review

|

$871

Change Currency What's this?
SRAM offers a new level of budget-based performance with Apex, but there are concessions made, namely crank stiffness and braking performance

BikeRadar verdict

3.5 out of 5 stars

"If you’re on a tight budget, Apex is worth a look whether you want the ultra-low gearing or not"

Wed 9 Feb 2011, 10:00 am GMTBy

The story with the entry-level SRAM Apex group is twofold: it offers an ultra-wide gear range without a triple crankset, and it brings a familiar performance package to a new low price. Since SRAM have been so vocal about Apex’s WiFLi – Wider, Faster, Lighter – properties, we’ll start there.

Our test groupset is of the WiFli variety (a standard version is also available) and made up of a compact 50/34t crankset mated to an 11-32t 10-speed cassette. This package gives the now familiar top gear of 50/11 or 119.9 gear inches and a mountain bike-esque 34/32 low gear or 28 gear inches.

This allows any cycling enthusiast who currently rides a double crankset to scale the steepest of hills with a never-before-experienced ease – albeit quite slowly, depending on one’s ability to maintain a high cadence.

But there is a downside to the wide range. The rider must sometimes sacrifice finding the perfect gear on the flats, due to the cassette’s large – though relatively evenly spaced– differentials from cog to cog. This is especially apparent in that sweet spot between the 19t and 23t cogs.

Apex served to launch sram's wifli concept of an ultra-wide range transmission that relies on a double crank:

Apex served to launch SRAM's WiFLi concept of an ultra-wide-range transmission that relies on a double crank

After three months on the new group, it's clear that the WiFLi version of Apex is an acquired taste. It may not be for everyone – those living in pancake-flat areas like Florida are particularly unlikely to enjoy riding the wide-range group. But mountain goats – the riders muscling up hour-long climbs in the North American Rockies or Italian Dolomites – will find Apex makes a pretty compelling point.

In these regions, even hardcore enthusiasts and racers will be able to appreciate the concept if they approach it with an open mind; it's something that's driven home by SRAM's competitors, who in some cases offer triple cranksets and nine-speed transmissions within their fourth-tier groups.

The wide range group also has purpose for touring and for those with some sort of drop bar, half mountain, half road Franken-bike. For those hardcore racers who are ‘ballin’ on a budget’, SRAM also offer a standard version of Apex, in which options of a standard length rear derailleur cage, standard 130BCD crank and range of standard cassette ratios are offered.

Shifters & derailleurs: Typical SRAM feel, but watch the cables

Aside from the conductive feel of the alloy brake lever and slightly more plastic used in the shifter’s hood body, Apex’s DoubleTap levers feel and function exactly like the Force or Rival versions. We see Apex as a perfect second group for a winter or rainy day training bike or for a cyclo-cross pit bike, since the ergonomic feel mirrors the rest of the SRAM line.

The apex doubletap shifters have all of the bells and whistles of sram's other shifters, save for a zeroloss rear mechanism:

The Apex DoubleTap shifters have all of the bells and whistles of SRAM's other shifters, save for a ZeroLoss rear mechanism

Apex shifters are equipped with a full complement of SRAM’s technologies, including reach adjustments for brake and shift levers, ZeroLoss front shifting and dual cable routing options. Note that Red is the only group with a ZeroLoss rear shifter, while the second-, third- and now fourth-tier groups only offer ZeroLoss for their front shifters.

After just two weeks of testing we found that shifting quality, both front and rear, was beginning to deteriorate rapidly. After assessing the shifters, cables and derailleurs, we concluded that this loss in performance was due to the low quality cables that Apex is equipped with. We switched to SRAM’s Gore Professional Sealed cable kit, which vaulted the shift quality and lever feel to a level superior to that of the shifters when they were new.

Front and rear derailleurs offered little to pick on. The pivots of both came tight and remained that way, which helped to produce snappy shifts.

Brakes: Name brand pads are a bonus, but calipers lack power

While SRAM seem to have skimped on derailleur cables to the detriment of the group’s performance, in other areas they've invested in name-brand parts and materials – namely the SwissStop brake pads. The compound proved to wear well and offered the expected braking feel. However, the system came up slightly short on performance.

Along with the cranks, the apex brake calipers were a place where performance is conceded:

There are SwissStop pads hidden under the grime on our Apex caliper

The Apex caliper lacks the power of Red or Force, and we suspect its downgraded material and design (without internally-skeletonized lower arms) is to blame. We mentioned this to SRAM’s road press manager Michael Zellmann, who encouraged us to again look to the cables as the source. His concern prompted an 11th hour cable and housing change and associated testing.

While there seemed to be a slight improvement – we weren’t able to ride our usual test route due to snow and sub-zero (Farenheit) temperatures – performance was still nowhere near that of SRAM’s top tier groups. We were still able to descend without any problems, but had to compensate for the lack of power by increasing braking distances – by roughly five to 10 percent – and/or using more lever force.

Cranks: Soft feel is the cost of keeping costs down

Inferior construction is also evident in the Apex crankset. While the arms are cold-forged from AL-6061-T6 aluminum they're solid – not hollow – and noticeably softer through the arms and spider than the Rival OCT (Open Core Technology) crank, or any of the brand’s carbon offerings.

The Apex compact crank sports a 147mm Q-Factor and is available in five lengths from 165-180mm. It's available in standard 53/39t, 130mm BCD; compact 50/34t and ’cross 48/34t (both 110mm BCD) chainring combinations.

The apex bottom bracket features sram's new gutter seal sealing; it ran smooth once broken in and held up perfectly:

The Apex bottom bracket features SRAM's new Gutter Seal sealing; it ran smooth once broken in and held up perfectly

Weight is a respectable 872g, with the new Apex GXP bottom bracket. This features SRAM’s new gutter seal design, which caused a noticeable amount of drag upon installation but broke in acceptably and held up well during our winter test period.

Chain and cassette: A solid finish

The final two components – chain and cassette – performed flawlessly and proved durable over the course of our test. Yes, there were large – but even – jumps on the 11-32t cassette, which hampered the system’s smoothness, but we didn’t miss shifts and were content with the overall performance.

A couple of notes on the cassette: SRAM offer 10 different models of the PG-1050, and while ours featured the widest range, the sheer number of cog combinations offers the ability to tune the gearing to best fit your local terrain.

You may also notice that SRAM have discontinued their use of the Open Glide design in favor of the older Power Glide technology. On the Apex cassettes, the latter design no longer uses a missing tooth as a shift gate. We found the PG technology to shift just as well as OG, with the benefit of being quieter. OG is now only available on the Red PowerDome cassette.

The 11-32t cassette of the wifli version turns a road bike into a mountain goat: the 11-32t cassette of the wifli version turns a road bike into a mountain goat

Both chain and cassette performed flawlessly during testing

Conclusion: Apex's strongest Rival

Apex does offer SRAM's lowest price point to date, at US$861. However, that saving comes at the price of detuned performance – particularly when it comes to brakes and cranks – compared to the third-tier Rival group at $1,041. Ultimately, we feel Apex gives up a bit more in performance than it does in price, meaning that Rival offers better value for money.

Upgrading Apex with Rival brakes and cranks would be a somewhat futile exercise, since it would make up $124 of the $180 price difference. And if it's the wide-range gears that appeal, a WiFLi version of Rival is now available. Of course, there will be many out there who can't afford the third-tier group, and Apex does seem to have allowed manufacturers to bring a greater level of performance to new price points. 

SRAM Apex stats:

  • DoubleTap shifters: 356g; US$375 (£232.23)
  • Rear derailleur (mid-cage): 207g; $78 (£48.30)
  • Front derailleur (braze-on): 88g; $49 (clamp-on not tested, $57) (£30.34/35.30)
  • GXP crankset (compact): 764g; $156 (sold w/BB) (£96.61)
  • GXP bottom bracket: 108g (sold w/crank)
  • PG-1050 cassette (11-32t): 300g; $90 (£55.73)
  • PG-1031 chain (114 links): 283g; $37 (£22.91)
  • Brakeset: 313g; $76 (£47.06)
  • Group total: 2,419g; $861 (w/braze-on FD) (£533.21)

What's the score with BikeRadar reviews? You can find a full explanation of our ratings here.

Manufacturers description

The first 11-32 cassette on the road. You like to climb long mountain passes, or your local hill, but don't want clumsy triple cranks on your bike? With the first 11-32 cassette for the road, and our new SRAM Apex compact crankset, you will have a wider gear range than the most popular triple combinations. A wider gear ratio means you can climb and descend more efficiently. You also get all of our unmatched technical advantages like Zero-loss, reach-adjust, and DoubleTap shifting. SRAM Apex, wherever the road takes you.

User Reviews

There are 6 reviews on this post

Showing 1 - 6 of 6 comments

  • I think the review misses the point of the group a bit. People looking at the Apex group will be looking for the gap between Tiagra and 105 (or not up for Rival just yet). When shopping for a new bike this group has helped bike brands chip away at higher carbon framed bikes. Looking from the top down of course it's not going to stack up well, but look from the bottom up and the true light of the group will shine. I think just bridging the gap from triple cranks to light weight compact is worth a mention too.

  • I agree with the other reviewer that the overall review is missing the intention of the Apex group. The review gives the reader the impression as if somebody would set up his high end machine with SRAM Apex and compare to the performance to other high end benchmark groups. Would you do this with Sora or 105 Shimano? probably not. I am riding Apex now for 1000 miles on my Communter/Cross bike since i bought it last summer, overall it is a solid package although i cannot comment on the brakes since i have Canti lever brakes. I did a 240 mile tour with 30lbs of stuff on the rear rack and can only say the Apex lived up to the expectations. The new Sram BB seems to last longer than the old version, the crank does the job, shifting is decent although there is some decline over time especially if you ride in wet conditions since it is not a sealed system but still on the tolerable side. For pure cross or road a different cassette ratio is recommended for the rest the 11-32 does a wonderful job. And for the high end mountain goat prep you can get rear derailleur and chain for 150$ put it on your SRAM Red set-up and ride up the Mortiolo like Ivan Basso.

  • very out of touch review - i have the brakes which were 45 a pair with swiss stops and they are very well modulated and powerful. the next level up is a massive price increase. ithink you guys need to realise that people in the real world dont get given bikes for free dripped in dura ace. maybe factor that in in future reviews,im sure for every dura ace rider there are hundreds of 105 riders. etc etc

  • This groupset is made for OEM bikes, and to compete with Tiagra and 105. The problem is, when you review it independently, the price is much too close to Rival and it is even more expensive than the great new 105-groupset. It simple doesn't make sense to buy a complete groupset to fit on your bike, when you can get Centaur and 105 for the same price and Rival for just a bit more.

    But sure, if you are looking at to evenly priced bikes, one with Apex and one with Tiagra, Apex is a good choice.

  • I don't understand lauandruss's comment. They said Rival is a better deal for $180 more. How can you possibly compare that to being "dipped in Dura Ace"?

  • While the Apex Group may be an alternative for a triple, it has been a huge disappointment for me with regard to the quality of the hardware used to keep the chain rings in place. For some reason, the bolts continually loosen during normal usage. I suppose I could put locktite on the threads, but would run the chance of stripping the threads (they are extremely fine pitch) when I want to remove the rings for a cleaning. I have owned 4 different bikes over the last 20 years - all fitted with Shimano of varying price points - and have never had as many failures as I have with my year-old Trek X01 with the Apex group.

Submit Your Review:

You need to login or register to post comments.

Specification

Name:
Apex
Built by:
SRAM
Price:
$871.00

Description:
Performance road groupset available with both wide-range and standard gearing options
Manufacturer's Description:
The first 11-32 cassette on the road. You like to climb long mountain passes, or your local hill, but don't want clumsy triple cranks on your bike? With the first 11-32 cassette for the road, and our new SRAM Apex compact crankset, you will have a wider gear range than the most popular triple combinations. A wider gear ratio means you can climb and descend more efficiently. You also get all of our unmatched technical advantages like Zero-loss, reach-adjust, and DoubleTap shifting. SRAM Apex, wherever the road takes you.