Scott Spark 930 review

|

£2999

Scott Spark 930

BikeRadar verdict

70.0 out of 5 stars

"Great frame and decent kit, but remote control shock will decide whether it’s your ideal speed bike"

Monday, March 4, 2013 8.00am By

Scott introduced their Spark 29er last year, and the potentially ultra-light, remote lockout-equipped machine only continued Scott’s deserved popularity among racers. The tyres and shock don’t make the most of the bike’s surprisingly hardcore trail riding character. 

Ride & handling: Naturally fast and fun

With a reasonable all-up weight and immediate shock lockout, the Spark spins up fireroads and tarmac well and the ‘high’ chip position gives it a more perched cross-country feel. The middle setting is essential for stopping back-end bob and morale sapping suck-down in high torque/low rev situations on rougher climbs, however, and that in turn makes it more prone to spilling traction and momentum over the bigger lumps. 

It never felt as dynamic as the best marathon bikes under power; prodding at the shock remote more than the shifters can get really wearing when your head, legs and lungs are about to explode on a typically knobbly big country climb.

With the geometry chip in low and the shock fully open, the Spark feels like a proper badass. The rollover effect of the big volume tyres offsets the twin chamber-compromised feel of the rear shock, so while it doesn’t enhance the ride it doesn’t undermine it too badly either. 

Add impressive mainframe stiffness and that smooth-riding Fox fork and the Spark’s downhill and tech trail attitude is all about minimum braking and maximum speed. The downhill trails were definitely the Scott’s time to shine. 

The low centre of gravity and relaxed head encourages you to properly throw it through corners too, but the budget Schwalbe rubber means you won’t always end up where you expected (or still on the bike) in wet and slippery conditions. New rubber is an essential upgrade.

Scott spark 930:

Frame & equipment: Decent kit on an excellent frame, shock aside

The seriously light 930 is the cheapest carbon front/alloy rear Spark frame. The skinny quick-release rear axle means some tracking flex, but shifter and shock cables are internal and the bottom bracket is a very stiff, light press-fit design. The neat bar lever toggles the twin chamber shock from open to reduced volume to lockout, and tallies with similar settings on the synced Fox fork. 

The SRAM transmission is light, the Shimano Deore brakes are excellent and the Syncros finishing kit includes decent wheels and saddle, plus a well-shaped short-stem, mid-width flat bar cockpit. The Schwalbe tyres are cheap plastic versions, though. 

We love the Scott’s mix of low weight and high stiffness, as it helps create surprisingly playful and descent-dialled handling. The Spark’s kit levels are good for the price too. But it’s the usual Scott story of whether you like the idea of the remote shock switching – or not – that will ultimately decide if the Spark ignites your riding enthusiasm. 

This article was originally published in What Mountain Bike magazine, available on Apple Newsstand and Zinio.

What's the score with BikeRadar reviews? You can find a full explanation of our ratings here.

User Comments

Submit Your Review:

Specification

Name:
Spark 930 (13)
Brand:
Scott
Price:
£2999

Available Colours:
Black/White/Red
Available Sizes:
XL L M S
Brakes:
SRAM GXP PF integrated
Cassette:
SRAM PG-1050 11-36T
Chain:
SRAM PC-1031
Cranks:
SRAM S-1000 GXP PF, 38/24T
Fork:
Fox 32 Float 29 Evolution CTD, remote, air, 100mm
Frame Material:
IMP5 technology/HMF NET carbon (F), alloy (R)
Front Derailleur:
SRAM X7
Front Hub:
15QR Syncros hub
Front Tyre:
SCHWALBE
Grips/Tape:
Syncros Pro, lock-on
Handlebar:
Syncros FL1.5 T-bar, flat, 700mm
Headset Type:
Ritchey Comp Plus, tapered
Rear Derailleur:
Syncros X9
Rear Hub:
142x12mm Syncros hub
Rear Shock:
Scott DT Nude2, 100mm
Rear Tyre:
Schwalbe
Rims:
Syncros/DT Swiss XR2.5 29
Saddle:
Syncros XR2.0
Seatpost:
Syncros FL2.0
Shifters:
SRAM X7 Trigger
Stem:
Syncros FL1.5, 90mm
Weight (kg):
12.1
Weight (lb):
26.67

Latest questions

Related links