'Bike motorways' for London

Riders should become a more common sight on London's streets (BikeRadar)
One of the most radical shifts ever in
Mayor Ken Livingstone today officially unveiled the Greater London Authority’s vision for a less congested, more ecologically friendly, healthier and quicker transport system. It is a vision in which, for the first time, cycling will be fully funded and officially integrated into the existing transport network. The GLA says this will happen thanks to:
·
A
·
About a dozen cycling corridors providing safe, easy
access to central
·
Bike Zones in both inner and outer
· On-line cycling information encouraging Londoners to make the switch to pedal power
· Improved bike/rail integration with more cycle parking facilities at stations
The cost
of implementing the changes will match the scale of the ambition according to Livingstone.
“We will spend something like £500 million over the next decade
on cycling - the biggest investment in cycling in
The
London Cycling Campaign (LCC) has welcomed the proposals while sounding a note
of caution. “While the target for a 400% increase [in
The
LCC’s campaigns manager Tom Bogdanowicz added: “The key is in the delivery. We
will be looking for changes in Transport for
The CTC has also greeted Ken Livingstone's vision of a more cycle-friendly London positively: “Aiming to get people to cycle for ten percent
of round trips is a fantastically ambitious proposal from the Mayor
and will revolutionise life in the capital," said their campaigns and policy manager,
The GLA and Transport for London will now begin to work with the various London boroughs to implement the plans. The GLA controls just 5% of London's road space with the remainder being the responsibility of the capital's local authorities whose support and co-operation will be crucial if the Mayor's blueprint is to become a reality within his proposed timescales.
But what do you think? Would the proposed cycling corridors lead to pressure on riders to use designated routes only and make them less welcome elsewhere? Is there room on the city’s crowded pavements for the 6,000 bikes to be made available for hire? Will the £500 million - which is not yet fully costed - actually materialise? Are the various London boroughs all likely to be as enthusiastic about the proposals as the Mayor? Log in and leave your comments below.
You can follow BikeRadar on Twitter at twitter.com/bikeradar and on Facebook at facebook.com/BikeRadar.
User Comments
There are 3 comments on this post
Showing 1 - 3 of 3 comments
-
jweston
Posted Tue 12 Feb, 9:49 am GMT Flag as inappropriate
Bike motorways. Sounds like a great idea. Bikes must be equally considered with other modes of transport. An uninterrupted bike expressway would be great, we really have to put a stop to 'paint on the road' and 'stop go' cycling facilities, they're simply not worth the bother and more dangerous than nothing. Allowing cyclists to keep their momentum whilst making their journey has got to increase the distances people are prepared to cycle in the capital?
-
mascott
Posted Tue 12 Feb, 9:58 am GMT Flag as inappropriate
I can't believe this political manoevre
I feel this is Mayor Ken trying to position himself ready for the elections that are coming up.
He will be up against Borris Johnson who will be seen as a keen cyclist and therefore potentially as a green candidate and certainly one who might attract the cyclist vote.
So now Ken is announcing this unfunded super plan so that when talk turns inevitably to Borris on his bike Ken can say "aha....look what I am going to do"
I think we will find that just after the election there will be "funding issues" and Ken can cleverly blame the Local Authorities, but by then he will be elected and can move on
Sorry for sounding cynical but I just dont trust Red Ken... (or Borris....)
-
Keiron Curtis
Posted Sun 17 Feb, 12:41 pm GMT Flag as inappropriate
The idea is great, but is the ambition real? As with all announcements today, there is alot of hype and spin, the key to the materialisation of such grand plans is simple. Will the money needed be fprthcoming? I doubt it, just look at the Millenium dome, the forthcoming London Olympics, where the government came cap in hand to the lottery commission? No doubt the same will happen with this grandiose scheme, not that £500 million over 10 years works out anywhere near the real investment needed for it.


