Japanese bike mums battle authorities over kid carrying

By Richard Peace | Saturday, Jul 11, 2009 10.53am

The cycling ‘school run mums’ of Japan – of which there are very, very many – are currently in the midst of a battle with the authorties over the specification of their kiddy carrying bikes.  

Some time ago the Japanese government reviewed its traffic laws. Cyclists seemed to be particularly hard hit ; no longer would they be able to ride on pavements, use mobile phones or mp3 players or carry open umbrellas.  

But the intended amendment which seems to have caused most unhappiness was the one banning sannin-nori, the practice whereby a mother transports her young children to school on a bicycle, one in a basket at the front and the other on a seat at the rear with the mother pedalling between them. (Many Japanese kindergartens ban people from bringing their children to school by car ~ ed.)  

Such was the pressure from mothers that the National Police Agency has caved in on the idea, on condition that stronger, safer bikes are used. However, the matter is not resolved as the cost of a new child-carrying bike that meets the safety standards is high compared to the cost of a normal bike with child seats. “It will cost 10 percent to 20 percent more just for a reinforced frame,” a Bridgestone official said.

One or two places are aiming to offer help to their residents in the form of a subsidy towards the cost of a bike that meets the new standards, or renting out such bikes. But most places don’t, in sharp contrast to the subsidies offered when child car seats became mandatory in 2000.  

Another suggestion that has not gone down well is that tricycles might be used, being more stable. The cost of a tricycle is about £500 as against about £50 for the traditional design of “mama-chariot”, as they are known, with its basket, child seat, kick-stand, built-in lock and one gear.

Those carrying two children on a non-approved bike could be fined but the police agency plans to start issuing warnings instead until the sale of new models gets into full swing and the public becomes fully acquainted with the new rules.

You can follow BikeRadar on Twitter at twitter.com/bikeradar and on Facebook at facebook.com/BikeRadar.

User Comments

There are 6 comments on this post

Showing 1 - 6 of 6 comments

  • Good luck to the mums in their battle against the nanny state - a battle we seem to have lost in the UK long ago....

  • Daz

    The nanny state ia required because 90 % of the people in it need a nanny.

    Democracy is well over-rated. If i was nanny, every household would be allowed 1 car max, it would be illegal to drive a kid to school if they lived within a mile of the school and bikes would be VAT free.

  • The photo is of China ,not Japan .

    The character written is Chinese.

    Really sh#t and stupid way of handling of information .

  • Nanny Rex, you'd have to be nanny of the whole EU to make bikes VAT free or leave Europe all together. Which would you prefer?

  • I look forward to the day when we ban mp3 players. Well done the Japs.

    Lazy journalism on the picture.

  • I read on a tandem forum that the Japanese law forbids any two people from riding on the same bike - and thereby makes tandems illegal to use there! I hope that this new version of the law has now changed this.

Post a Comment:

You need to login or register to post comments.