Yellow fever raging
The storm over Michael Rasmussen's missed dope tests shows no sign of abating, with yet more officials, team managers and newspapers taking aim at the Dane in the past 24 hours.
UCI president Pat McQuaid has led the critics, commenting on Monday: "From an image point of view, it would be better if it was not Rasmussen but one of the youngest riders winning the Tour."
Asked for his reaction to McQuaid's remarks, Rasmussen, who has refused to discuss any matter not strictly race-related in the past 48 hours, said: "That's news to me. I have been training for this Tour ever since I left hospital with a broken left femur last October. I have every intention of trying to win the race."
McQuaid was far from the only one to crank up the already stifling pressure on the Tour leader on Monday. In an interview with Le Figaro, Tour president Patrice Clerc banished any hint that, by deciding not to exclude the Rabobank climber last week, race organisers ASO had given Rasmussen its moral support. Clerc said that he "regretted" Rasmussen's presence in the race. The Tour chief called the race leader's failure to communicate his whereabouts an act of "guilty negligence."
Speaking in Foix ahead of stage 15 this morning, Clerc was even more outspoken, particularly about Rasmussen's refusal to answer questions about doping in post-race press conferences. "When you wear the yellow jersey, you really have to be an example," Clerc said. "He's not an example and, to me, he doesn't deserve to wear the yellow jersey...What he's doing now, saying that won't answer questions about doping, is another way of not taking responsibility and not showing the sport respect. "
Also in Foix, Astana manager Marc Biver was asked whether his team may be interested in he Dane when his contract expires at the end of the season. Biver replied: "He's not coming to Astana, that's for sure. Will anyone want to sign him? In this business there are people who don't care about ethics, people who are totally selfish. Someone will sign him..."
That someone definitely won't be Jean-René Bernaudeau. The Bouygues Telecom supremo told L'Equipe today that he wasn't among those swooning at Rasmussen's climbing at Plateau de Beille on Sunday.
Even if he'd been watching, Berneadeau probably wouldn't have been too enamoured.
"I was at my hotel an hour before the stage ended and I didn't watch the end of the race. I had no desire to," Bernaudeau told L'Equipe. "It reminded me of the start of the decade. Last year, there'd been a change, but now, there's nothing."
Clearly many are outraged. Others have decided that sarcasm is the only response to Rasmussen. French newspaper Libération positioned itself very much in the latter camp on Monday morning. Here's a small taste:
"The German TV stations ARD and ZDF are wrong to prefer Inspector Derrick to the Tour de France: here, there's all sorts of drama. Miracles. You can tell that we're getting close to Lourdes, that it's the Tour of the resurrection. Take Rasmussen, for example, this prodigy that the Vatican wants in its number. Michael, the Dane from Rabobank, was a climber. Suddenly, on Saturday, he became a time triallist, whereas usually he sinks in that discipline...And we're already dreaming: Sunday, on the Champs Elyées, Rasmussen, in yellow, wins the bunch sprint. Because he's going to become a sprinter between now and then. Yes, Michael, you can do it. You became a time triallist in three days, you have six left to master sprinting...It can be done, their farce is with you."
User Comments
There are 3 comments on this post
Showing 1 - 3 of 3 comments
-
danishfan
Posted Tue 24 Jul, 12:10 am UTC Flag as inappropriate
The hunt for Michael Rasmussen is predictable. Leading it is an american with a dubious story of something, that should have happened five years ago. There is no evidence what so ever. And everybody smells blood. They are currently setting everything up, so that Discovery can win by kicking Michael Rasmussen out. Then the team which practically has owned Le Tour for the last many years continue their reign. Last year another american, who had been with Lance Armstrong for years, gained the yellow jersey doped out of his wits, and he still has chances to keep it if his lawyers are clever enough. And today Vinokurov returned from the door of death and won only to be heralded as a great champion, proving that Le Tour de France is all about politics and jealousy. Just think of Jesper Worre, head of the danish cycling organisation, who has been voicing his criticism of Michael Rasmussen was himself convicted of something Michael Rasmussen never has been linked to: Doping. So who is talking?
Now they just have to snatch the jersey from Michael Rasmussen, who has not failed any tests and who is not doing suspiciously well. He has one stage victory and has twice been beaten on a high mountain by Contador, the Discovery rider.
It is all a setup. Michael Rasmussen always was a rider, who delivered the kind of brave cycling, that everybody wants. Now McQuaid and some other blokes sitting by desks will ruin the victory of this brave rider.Shame on them.
To me Rasmussen is a true winner.
-
Doog007
Posted Tue 24 Jul, 8:33 am UTC Flag as inappropriate
In football, sorry to use this but its a good example, a certain player was banned for 9 months for missing a drugs test. If doping rules were the same for all sports then this whole Rasmussen story would never have got anywhere, there is just no consistency. The man is either guilty in which case he shouldn't have been allowed to start tdf or he is not. As he is in the race and performing well then shouldn't the officials, team managers and fellow cyclists shut up and try harder to catch him? As for conspiracies, I think the fact that he is not french/spanish or american is just plain annoying some people.
-
alanmcn1
Posted Tue 24 Jul, 3:23 pm UTC Flag as inappropriate
A few thibgs are really annoying me here. First of all, has anyone considered the fact that Rasmussen's time trial on Saturday was the first he has ever ridden in a GT which actually meant something, hence the performance. There must be a hell of a difference between taking it easy on a TT as king of the mountaisn with nothing to gain, and going out last on the road to defend THE yellow jersey!!!??!
Secondly, the hypocrisy of the cycling hierarchy is vomit inducing. Everyone has a say on the chicken's missed tests, and some half-assed story from a bitter failed American MTBer, knowing the will get their 5 mins airtime. he should be banned, he shouldn't be riding! Why? He has not infringed rules, and even if he did try to dope in 2002, who is the guy currently 3rd in the Green jersey standings? none other than self confessed doper Erik Zabel!!!!!!!!
The only thing ruining cycling in this tour is the over-hyped media, looking for a story to run with, and a rider to persecute...............sorry, rant over
- 1









Post this story to: