News

Wed 4 Nov 2009, 11:35 am UTC

News archive

'Road tolls and charges needed to encourage cycling'

By Richard Peace

New research from the University of Derby suggests UK transport policy is fundamentally flawed when it comes to encouraging cycling.

The report says the current push to get people onto bikes and simultaneously improve and extend the road network will be counter-productive.

It argues that these moves will reduce pressure on the roads, and when people realise the roads have become quieter, they will revert to using cars.

Report author Dr John Stubbs, the university's senior lecturer in geography and an avid cyclist, has looked at official bicycle and car usage figures from the past half-century.

He said: "By trying to improve cycling and car use at the same time, you effectively ensure that cycling will always lose out.

"There is immense difficulty for any government in deciding to get out of this vicious circle by drastically cutting back on its roads investment, with plenty of people ready to say it would harm the economy. But how much is traffic congestion actually costing the UK every year?” 

Official estimates suggest congestion in England will cost £22 billion by 2025, in terms of lost working hours (Eddington Transport Study, 2006).

Dr Stubbs said: “My intention with this research is not to ‘bash the car driver’, but the beauty of taking a mathematical approach to this problem, looking at the government’s own figures from the past 50 years, is that the results are there for anyone to see."

So what is the solution? Dr Stubbs says future governments may have to look at unpopular measures like toll roads and congestion charges, as well as promoting other modes of transport, such as cycling, through financial incentives like the Cycle to Work scheme (which enables employees to buy a new bike tax-free).

As Dr Stubbs points out, £140 million is to be spent by Cycling England by 2010 on trying to increase the number of people cycling. This is an enormous amount of money, but in the overall scheme of things, is it enough?

A look at Department for Transport figures underlines the seismic nature of changes that have occurred in the past 50 years. The number of vehicles licensed in Britain rose from 7.8 million in 1959 to 28.3m in 1999, to 34.2m by the end of 2008.

The number of kilometres travelled by bike was 14 billion in 1959. This had fallen to 4bn in 1999 and is still at about that figure.

The Stubbs research predicts further substantial rises in car use and a further fall in cycle use unless there is a radical shift in government policy.

You can follow BikeRadar on Twitter at twitter.com/bikeradar.

User Comments

There are 7 comments on this post

Showing 1 - 7 of 7 comments

  • "New research from the University of Derby suggests UK transport policy is fundamentally flawed when it comes to encouraging cycling"

    Another pointless study about our useless, uneducated, assuming government!

  • 'New research'

    University of stating the bl**dy obvious!

    And I went there! The shame!

  • There's a subtle difference between 'encouraging cycling' & 'discouraging motorists'.

    A policy of road tolls and charges might acheive the latter but will probably not acheive the former.

    The phrase 'Stealth tax' comes to mind.

  • My view on the reasons for people cycling changed dramatically when I moved from working in central London to a rural office that provides a dream ride to work for potential cyclists. The problem is that travelling by car to the office is quick and easy. Thus I am one of about 4 regular cyclists in an office of over 500.

    So, having a safe and enjoyable cycle presumably isn't enough. What you need is the lack of a better/cheaper alternative, as is often the case in major cities like London.

    However, I don't believe that effectively forcing people onto the bike is the right way to encourage cycling as they aren't willing cyclists. Unfortunately the thing that would probably make a bigger impact than anything would be for large numbers of popular celebrities taking to the bike. I wouldn't mind betting that a dozen photos in the tabloids of Jordan on a bike would probably have a bigger impact on bike sales and cycling than a thousand miles of new cycle lanes.

  • Cycling is a form of transport that is limited in its use. Fine for commuting to work (as long as you don't have to carry too much), fine for recreation. But try going to a client meeting on a bike - arriving sweaty or worse, or taking your children to school in the dark and the wet, or going shopping with your baby...

    Cars are convienient in a way bikes can't be... Surely the key message should be - if the journey requires a car - use a car, if a bike is ok then use the bike, but not to bludgeon people into using the bike for the sake of it.

  • Blimey, "fallen to 4bn in 1999", assuming a population of 50 million, that means on average every man, woman and child in the UK were cycling 800km per year in 1999.

  • 50 million into 4 billion is only 80km - check your calculator

  • 1

Post comment:

You need to login or register to post comments.

Please confirm you are a person by entering the words in the box below:

Also on BikeRadar