News

Thu 16 Oct, 1:45 pm UTC

News archive

Tour of Germany stops; ARD and ZDF won't show Tour de France

By AFP

Professional cycling suffered a Black Thursday in Germany when organisers announced the scrapping of the 2009 Tour of Germany the same day broadcasters pulled the plug on covering next year's Tour de France.

German media giants ARD, the number-one broadcasters here, and fellow national television channel ZDF announced Thursday they would not cover the Tour de France again because of recent cases of failed drugs testing.

And just hours later, the German Cycling Federation (BDR), in a statement with the organisers, announced the 2009 Deutschland Tour would not take place for the same reason.

"We regret taking this decision, but it had to be done," said Tour of Germany organiser Kai Rapp.

The development came after the organisers met with their financers and the decision was taken to cancel the national event indefinitely.

The scrapping of the German Tour and the decision by both ARD and ZDF comes less than 24 hours after Austria's Bernhard Kohl, who finished third overall in last year's Tour de France, admitted to using CERA, the new generation of banned blood booster EPO (erythropoietin).

Kohl was the fourth rider on this year's Tour after Italian duo Riccardo Riccò and Leonardo Piepoli and Gerolsteiner team-mate Stefan Schumacher to have been caught out by the new tests for CERA (Continuous Erythropoiesis Receptor Activator).

"The sporting value of the Tour de France has been reduced by the accumulation of failed drugs tests," said ARD chairman Fritz Raff after the decision was made following a meeting in Cologne. "Therefore, its broadcast value has sunk deeply."

In Paris, the ASO (Amaury Sport Organisation), which organises the Tour de France, said it was stunned by ARD's decision to drop the event from its schedules claiming it could "sadly encourage those fighting against doping to ease up in order to guarantee a broadcast".

"ARD asks that we fight doping but then takes offence when doped riders are found. We must look and find nothing."

ARD pulled the plug on broadcasting the 2007 Tour de France in the middle of the competition after German rider Patrick Sinkewitz failed a drugs test for testosterone.

The broadcasters had been set to renegotiate their contract with Tour organisers to screen next year's race, but Thursday's announcement means there are now no plans to screen the world's premier cycling event here in the near future. The consortium cover a broad range of media including television, radio and websites and German television channel ZDF soon followed ARD's example.

"ZDF will also not broadcast the Tour without ARD," said ZDF's chief spokesman Nikolaus Brender.

Both ARD and ZDF will need to negotiate with the European Broadcast Union (EBU) about the consequences of their actions as both are members of the EBU which had a contract with Tour de France organisers to broadcast the race until 2011. The new contract was agreed in July.

"We always said that we would decide only at the end of the season. Why the EBU acted regardless before that we don't know," said an ARD spokesman.

Thomas Bach, president of the German Olympic Sport Federation (DOSB), was surprised by the broadcasters' decision.

"I consider it premature, the Tour doesn't take place until the summer of 2009," he told German sports agency SID from Cologne. "They should have waited to see what decisions the International Cycling Union (UCI) take."

Thursday's events could have repercussions for German cycling teams like Kohl's former team Gerolsteiner who have stopped racing after their sponsorship was pulled.

Already German dairy manufacturers Milram have said they are considering their options as the already battered image of cycling takes another blow. A Milram spokesman said on Wednesday they had exit strategies in place if needed.

© AFP 2008

User Comments

There are 9 comments on this post

Showing 1 - 9 of 9 comments

  • Thank god I've got Euro Sport. Mind you, no one compares to Phil Ligget.... the ARD coverage was always a bit of a joke.

    I think that ARD are just trying to pull some stunt to show they've got 'power' in the sport. All I know is that it wont make a difference to cycling fans here.

  • I have always been in two minds about lifetime bans for doping, but hearing that some countries are now deciding to wipe the sport off their calenders is really worrying, and the notion of much longer bans should now become a reality.

    I only hope that other channels worldwide don't follow suit and start switching off,... although maybe a few threats to the Tour Organisers and the UCI wouldn't go a miss and get them to wake up!!

    Riders must be made to realise that they are killing the sport, their livelihoods, and are ruining the glory of these historic sporting events.

  • thats ridiculous... I do not agree with a lifetime ban.

    I will keep watching it no matter what.

  • I get fed up with the attitude of some people. It really gauls me. They cannot accept the fact that if you test more and more and pump money into drug tesing that you will find more positive tests. It's blindingly obvious. The trouble is that human nature wants us to win and be successful and be rich. Bike riders are the same. If they dope then they win a lot more. If they don't then they won't win so much. I think I heard a British Professional say that "Why should they be just Mr Ordinary; why shouldn't I win".

    These bike riders aren't bad people; they just want to win desperately.

    The trouble is that this is about as close as we will get to a clean sport. Frequent positive tests and scandals is the present and the future. Once one doper steps out; another steps up. There will be no end to this. Get used to it.

    -Jerry

  • Well if coverage drops then sponsorship will follow and money with it.

    So less money means less incentive to cheat.

    Because there is less coverage and marketing there goes the R&D investment from the bike manufacturers.

    Then again take a company like New Balance that does not use high profile sports people to market their products and are successful - albeit not on the same scale as Nike.

    From what I'm reading it seems most supporters/fans hate cheats and will switched to supporting/following events that are tough on them. It sounds like media and marketing departments may feel the same way.

  • @jerry3571 - "These bike riders aren't bad people; they just want to win desperately"

    I disagree - if you cheat to win, or not, then you are a bad person! If you are a professional and cheat then it is even worse.

    How would you like to put your trust is a professional accountant and have him cheat you?

    Professional = trust = right to command higher earnings = requirement to behave appropriately

  • AS WAS ALLREADY SAID LESS TV COVERAGE, LESS SPONSORSHIP, BUT I DOUBT LESS CHEATING.. BUT IF THESE GUYS FEEL THAT THEY HAVE TO CHEAT TO WIN, LET IT REST ON THIER SOULS, ITS THIER CHOICE TO MAKE, I DONT AGREE WITH IT BUT ITS NOT MY PLACE TO JUDGE THEM, I WILL SAY THIS THOUGH... HOW MANY OF YOU THINK THAT YOU WOULD BE ABLE TO DO WHAT THEY WITHOUT "CHEATING"?

  • Who cares about Germany anyway, they are still bitter that they don't occupy France and therfor the tour of france. This isn't about doping, this goes way back, they still have scores to settle.

  • I know, why don't we stop all drug testing, then we have no positives, then german TV will be happy!

    It's daft, cycling is trying hard, much harder than ANY other sport to clean up and it is getting punished...

    Too much money in football to do anything about the suspected systematic doping there...

  • 1

Post comment:

You need to login or register to post comments.

Also on BikeRadar