News

Fri 7 Mar, 5:09 pm UTC

News archive

UCI boss slams colluding ASO and French sports ministry

By AFP

World cycling chief Pat McQuaid on Friday stoked the feud with race organisers Amaury Sports Organisation (ASO), accusing them of colluding to form a private league with the backing of the French sports ministry.

International Cycling Union (UCI) president McQuaid made his accusations in a column in French daily Le Monde just two days before the start of the Paris-Nice stage race.

The UCI have threatened to expel riders who take part in the first European stage race of the season from their organisation. The race is being organised by the ASO outside the UCI authority but under the aegis of the French federation.

Despite the UCI threat, a representative for the teams' association said Friday afternoon that following a meeting a clear majority of them had agreed to back participation. At the same time, the Swiss-based Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) declared it was not for it to judge on the legality of UCI sanctions.

The UCI and ASO are in dispute notably over team selections for the Tour de France, which is organised by the latter.

And McQuaid accused the ASO of "blackmail", using the Tour de France to force teams to participate in the Paris-Nice.

"We have to warn those who love cycling: accepting the demands of the ASO means transforming professional cycling into a league controlled by the dominant organiser and not an organisation representing the collective interest," wrote McQuaid in Le Monde. "The ASO is currently refusing the registration of the Paris-Nice in a calendar determined following a democratic process. They want to place their events outside the regulations to decide themselves, through contracts with the teams, the rules to which they will be subject."

The Irishman also warned that the French federation risked being suspended from the UCI for their support of the ASO. "Its president (French federation) will certainly be called before a disciplinary commission for the same reasons; the riders could be suspended for having participated in a race outside the bounds of UCI regulations."

McQuaid claimed that the organisation of a race outside their jurisdiction would threaten "the efficiency of the anti-doping battle".

And he slammed the French sports ministry for being "more occupied by supporting the projects of the ASO than motivated by the necessity to call to order a private agent which does not respect international rules."

He added: "By favouring the exit of an organiser from a federative framework the Ministry is in effect giving its blessing to the creation of a private league. Surprising, after affirming in November 2007 wanting to avoid it!

"Can a country circumvent international rules to favour what it believes to be national interests, which moreover are not so much threatened but manipulated by a commercial agent? Can a political leader be party to a private organiser who wants to step outside a federative framework which is patiently elaborate?

"It's worth asking these questions."

© AFP 2008

User Comments

There are 2 comments on this post

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 comments

  • Had Pat McQuaid been his own man, I think he would have done a fine job.

  • What UCI (Pat Mc Quaid and Verbruggen) do last ten years against doping?? NOTHING. Article pusblished in Le Monde is a collection of stupid remarks, nonsenses and mistakes... First of all, conflict not only concerne ASO versus UCI, but RSO, Unipublic and ASO versus UCI. Instead of moderate conflict, UCI try to split cycling world by resuming conflict to ASO versus UCI and taking professionals cyclists hostage. Second, Mc Quaid said ASO is "currently refusing the registration of the Paris-Nice in a calendar determined following a democratic process": UCI have never been a democratic organisation (verbruggen, outgoing president, designate new president, Mc Quaid, for example) and ProTour has never following any democratic process!!!! Pro Tour have been impose by Mc Quaid and Verbruggen (to serve financial intentions), without agreement of majors actors of cycling. Third, McQuaid claimed that the organisation of a race outside their jurisdiction would threaten "the efficiency of the anti-doping battle"!!!!!! that's just great!!!!! is that all??? What are improvements in the fight against doping made by the UCI since 10 years???What are the results??? The general opinion is that 2007 has been the worst year of cycling history!!!! Biological passport is a light version of measures taken by french federation and in its current form, is nearly useless. Since 5 years and the creation of longitudinal medical monitoring for french cyclists, theirs results have never been so bad. Sure that is just a coincidence.... Doping stay common in cycling, it's a certainty. Finally, Mc Quaid accusations against ASO, accusing them of colluding to form a "private league with the backing of the French sports ministry" (??!!). What is he talking about??? Mc Quaid, as verbruggen, use fear to act out of self-interest. French government, ASO, unipuplic, RSO have never made the wish to create a private league, and anyway, they don't even they want. These declarations are just nonsenses. Seriously, Mr Mc Quaid and Verbruggen, it's time to resign from UCI...The complete list of nonsenses from Mc Quaid article: http://laflammerouge.com/article/4636/aso-uci-pour-vraiment-comprendre

  • 1

Post comment:

You need to login or register to post comments.

Also on BikeRadar