Vino tests positive after TT
Kazakh rider Alexandre Vinokourov tested positive for blood doping following his victory in last Saturday's time-trial stage in the Tour de France.
The 33-year-old had lost all chance of winning the Tour with a dismal performance in Sunday's 14th stage but bounced back to take Monday's 15th stage in the Pyrenees where he was once again tested. According to as yet unconfirmed reports from within the Tour he may also have failed the test after that stage victory too.
The rider's 'A' blood sample from the stage 13 time-trial is reported to have contained two different red blood cell populations according to the Tour's doping laboratory located at Châtenay-Malabry near Paris. This suggests that the Kazakh had received a transfusion very shortly before the beginning of the stage, using the blood of a compatible donor. Tests on Vinokourov's blood taken after his stage 15 victory yesterday are currently underway but according to L'Equipe newspaper, the second red blood cell population would still be detectable in the latest sample.
The rider's Astana team announced after his test failure they were quitting the race. "The anti-doping control on Alexandre Vinokourov, which was carried out on July 21 after the time trial in Albi, has tested positive," read a statement released by the Kazakh team.
"According to the ethical code of the Astana Cycling Team Alexandre Vinokourov has been suspended from the team with immediate effect. The rider has asked nevertheless for a B sample analysis.
"Informed by the Astana management, the organisers of the Tour de France invited the team to withdraw, which was immediately accepted."
Vinokourov, whose performance in Monday's stage was feted in the French press with headlines such as the 'Courage of 'Vino'', had been criticised before the Tour by Pat McQuaid - chief of the International Cycling Union (UCI) - for his association with Italian sports doctor Michele Ferrari.
Vinokourov, one of several former and present Telekom/T-Mobile riders to have either admitted or failed drugs tests, is not the first rider to be found to have been blood doping - American Tyler Hamilton and Spaniard Santi Perez being also found to have done so.
Vinokourov's case is a similar one to Hamilton's having in effect used blood from a compatible donor.
Ironically Vinokourov was unable to race in last year's Tour de France because five members of his then team Liberty were embroiled in a Spanish doping affair - it was mainly due to his efforts that he persuaded the Kazakh Government to sponsor the Astana team.
Tour bosses Christian Prudhomme and Patrice Clerc said tonight that the show must go on at the Tour de France, despite Alexandre Vinokourov's positive test for a blood transfusion after the Kazakh's victory in stage 13.
Clerc claimed that the idea of stopping the Tour "never crossed [his] mind."
"We have undertaken a ruthless war on doping and there's no question of us quitting," Clerc told journalists in Pau's Palais Beaumont this evening. "We are going to see this through to the very end. We're going right to the end of our convictions."
The Tour president had earlier revealed that Astana team manager Marc Biver notified them of the Vinokourov's positive test on Tuesday afternoon. Clerc said that Biver immediately agreed to withdraw the entire Astana team from the race.
Prudhomme said that a "revolution", rather than simple "changes", needed to take place to rid the sport and the Tour of doping. "I said to riders when the Tour started in London that they had a great opportunity. That opportunity's been wasted," sniffed the Tour director. "Anyone who cheats is playing Russian roulette..." he added.
Clerc admitted that he now regretted having handed Astana a wild-card invitation to the Tour. "I told them about the ethical rules and I regret being cheated. The only thing I respect about that team is that they agreed to leave the race immediately."
Prudhomme and Clerc announced that they will address the 151 riders left in the Tour tomorrow morning, prior to the third and final Pyrenean stage from Orthez to Gourette.
The news has overshadowed the reports from a press conference given by Michael Rasmussen in which he spoke about his attempts to notify the anti-doping authorities as to his whereabouts. In the conference the Dane appeared to get his dates hopelessly wrong.
©AFP2007 and BikeRadar
See also
Daniel Friebe's take on Rasmussen's "clouded memory".
Rest Day Review: Bikeradar podcast
Police take mystery bags from Astana hotel
Millar: "I want people to believe in riders"
Tour rolls on - and Aubisque could decide winner
Contador: "I've got nothing to lose"
User Comments
There are 10 comments on this post
Showing 1 - 10 of 10 comments
-
LondonBiker
Posted Tue 24 Jul, 5:58 pm UTC Flag as inappropriate
Incredibly sad - i think any hope that this is a cleaner tour is completely washed away.
Hate to say it, but when i watched yesterday's stage last night, my immediate thought wasn't "what a ride", instead it was "wow - it's just like Landis last year, wonder what he's taking"
-
Melpro
Posted Tue 24 Jul, 7:06 pm UTC Flag as inappropriate
Yes I'm afraid to say I thought the same. Any incredible performance will now and in the future always be tarnished by thoughts of 'I wonder what they've taken'.
Vino you are a stupid berk!
-
ScottDougall
Posted Tue 24 Jul, 7:51 pm UTC Flag as inappropriate
I did not think that - I was inspired by his courage and the guts of his ride - I was disappointed in Contador not attacking Rasmussen earlier in the stage - but most of all I was really inspired by Vino...
I remember thinking the same thing about Pantani and Ulrich - I feel really deflated by this news, but maybe I am not so dissapointed in Contador anymore - maybe he was tired and had no power to attack - maybe this is a sign that things are loking better for the future.
-
jamesparker
Posted Tue 24 Jul, 8:33 pm UTC Flag as inappropriate
It's just crazy!
I know it's too early to start speculating on the in's-and-outs of his positive test, but there is one thing that is really annoying me... The rest of Astana are surely in on this! Carrying blood around isn't just a simple matter of keeping it in your luggage where nobody will find it, blood must be kept under the correct conditions at all times. Who's going to be managing that whilst he's cycling??
Very very sad, but chins up, he got busted!
-
alanmcn1
Posted Tue 24 Jul, 8:47 pm UTC Flag as inappropriate
JamesParker.................spot on, and surely why the entire team has been "asked to leave". You just simply cannt perform a homologous blood transfusion on your own. I ranted about Astana being welcomed with open arms on the old Procycling forum (also made the magazine). This could be one body blow too many for the sport, but quite frankly the UCI and ASO only have themselves to blame
-
Dick-Head
Posted Tue 24 Jul, 9:00 pm UTC Flag as inappropriate
I said in a previous post that a rider must be considered innocent until proven guilty, appears there is proof this time! How did they expect to get away with it?
I agree with the last post and feel this could be a death blow for teams trying to find sponsors
To pose a question, what will happen if Mondays sample is clear?????
-
esmit208
Posted Tue 24 Jul, 10:46 pm UTC Flag as inappropriate
To the gentleman posing the question, "What is the B sample is negative?" There is a possibility it may be negative but there is a greater possibility it will be. This sport could fade away if the riders don't wake up. The sanctioning organizations have to make an attempt to clean up the sport even if that attempt appears to be somewhat feeble. My hat goes off to any individual that manages to earn a living in this sport because no doubt it takes physical conditioning beyond "belief". More and more the fans and enthusiasts of this sport will have difficulty "believing" pro cyclists do it fare and square. The WINE MAN GOETH, right into obscurity. I still love this sport!
-
esmit208
Posted Wed 25 Jul, 12:47 am UTC Flag as inappropriate
This latest revelation sends shockwaves through the sport like the Los Angeles Landers quake of 1993 did. It's sad that the actions of a few can affect so many. I was reading a story leading up to the tour when T-Mobile was in London to prepare for the start. One rider said people looked at them like "GANGSTERS". At this point what do all 189 starters think the public perception is? I ask myself, "Is it worth that much to these individuals to go to such great lengths JUST TO WIN?" Alexsandr didn't even have a chance to win it outright but was that fleeting moment of glory that important? To him I guess it was by attempting such risky measures. I will watch for the headline that states, "ALEXSANDR VINOKOUROV GIVES ONE YEARS SALARY BACK"! I'm taking bets it won't happen.
-
Dick-Head
Posted Wed 25 Jul, 6:39 am UTC Flag as inappropriate
Thinking about this overnight really makes me question the deeper politics behind the situation, as this was obviously a planned contingency to salvage something from the tour if it all went wrong for the overall.
I cannot believe it was a simple question of national pride; far better to ‘go down in flames’ than have the entire nation branded as cheats so it must be something else. Is the current structure of professional cycling so expensive as to force teams to risk everything to keep a sponsor?
-
Fatoldbiker
Posted Wed 25 Jul, 6:51 am UTC Flag as inappropriate
The comparison with Landis is very apt. How we are expected to believe that a rider can ride like an angel in a long and difficult time trial, ride like a dog in the mountains the next day then re-emerge like a butterfly the next and shred the field in another mountain stage is pushing the boundaries of logic.
I have little confidence or faith left in either the UCI or the pro teams to show the collective will to erradicate doping. Let's not kid ourselves, doping has always been a part of professional sport and cycling in particular and this latest round of hand wringing and wailing is just part of the continuum.
This tour has given us spectacular entertainment - Rasmussen and Contador in particular - but is it honest, clean or legal? I have to say I sincerely doubt it.
- 1














Post this story to: