News

Last Updated: Sun 7 Sep, 10:00 am BST

News archive

What’s smug and deserves to be decapitated?

By Mark Appleton

Matthew Parris has issued an apology for his Times column of December 27 in which he advocated “stringing piano wire across country lanes to decapitate cyclists.” In his latest piece the former Tory MP said: “I offended many with my Christmas attack on cyclists. It was meant humorously but so many cyclists have taken it seriously that I plainly misjudged. I am sorry.”

Mr Parris’ column has so far been the subject of 270 complaints to the UK’s Press Complaints Commission – a figure which would make it the second most complained-about article published in 2007. However, according to Stephen Abell assistant director of the PCC, the complaints are still coming in by phone and email, so Parris may well be able to claim a belated Christmas number one. The Commission will meet in the next 10 days or so to decide whether or not the column has breached its Code of Practice. If the 17 person panel decides it has, Parris himself will receive no sanction but the newspaper will be forced to publish its own apology.

While the column had originally generated a firestorm of protest in the blogosphere, the furore seems to have been re-ignited as people coming back to work after the Christmas break hear about and read the item for the first time themselves.

But what do you think? Do you accept Parris’ assertion that the column was “meant humorously”? Have you complained to the PCC yourself? Leave your comment below.

User Comments

There are 20 comments on this post

Showing 1 - 5 of 20 comments

  • The biggest worry here - are the idiots who could follow his advice! i've already ridden over very dangerous DIY "stinger" type devices made out of nails on my local trails!

  • like thumpers mum (remember bambi) if you dont have anything nice to say dont say anything at all !!!! hello mr parrish. beaten by a rabbit.

  • if he's serious about an apology, perhaps he should participate in a well publicised event or ride for a cycling charity.

  • I wonder what Mr Parrish does for fun. Rambling perhaps? I hope he's an equestrian (does that mean horse? Or horse rider? You know what I mean) because then we can just move the strings up a bit further ;)

  • terrym surley you mean cyclepath??

    Seriously though, what with attacks on cyclists by both motorists and pedestrians emphasised in the national press recently (before christmas and this letter), e.g. the chap in Edinburgh jailed for attacking a cyclist with his car, and the many stories about slapping cyclists from a moving vehicle etc, you would think that an educated man like this would have had more fore-thought than to spout forth in his column, without at least guessing at the reaction it would cause.

    I would wager that this was an attempt at gaining notoriety in the press, particularly during such an emotive period for the motorist/cyclist issue. Notice that there is something on TV tonight (7th January) about the rad rage 'war' between cyclists and motorists.

    Remember that being in the press is usually never bad for the career of someone in the press

Post comment

You need to login or register to post comments.

Also on BikeRadar