A look at the US cycling industry, part 2

By Matt Pacocha, US editor, in Boulder, USA | Thursday, Aug 25, 2011 3.40pm

In part one of this feature we looked at the US road bike market, where sales are flat – up in price but down in volume – and there are warnings of a price bubble. On the mountain bike side, things are looking rosier, with 29ers fuelling growth and riders buying multiple bikes for different types of riding.

Marc Sani, publisher of Bicycle Retailer and Industry News, the leading trade publication in the US, expects big-wheelers to go global in 2012, as Europe seems poised to finally and wholeheartedly adopt the larger wheel standard. “It’s new, it’s different [in Europe],” he says. “It [remains] a talking point at retail [in the US]; 29ers did well this year and I think they’ll do well next year.”

The buzz for the big wheel remains, however, a boom within the industry. Sani's opinion is that “people who aren’t into mountain biking aren’t even going to know what a 29er is". He attributes the rise of the 29in wheel to existing riders building up quivers of bikes.

Another long-time industry insider, who asked to remain anonymous, echoes similar sentiments. “There are a lot of people swapping out their [26in] hardtails for 29ers when they hadn’t ridden their hardtails in a couple of years because they’d been riding trail or all-mountain bikes,” he says. “Among the real hardcore guys, they’re building quivers of bikes. They’ll have a hardtail [29er] for cross-country, they’ll have a 4in to 5in trail bike and they may have a downhill sled. It’s a finite market.”

So, what will the next trend be? Sani thinks big wheels will push into the full-suspension ‘trail’ segment, which is loosely defined as bikes with 4in to 5in of travel. “The people who understand that level of technology are going to gravitate to the 29er, I think,” he says. And he may be right – Specialized's 2012 line offers a whole range of 5in- to 5.5in-travel ‘trail’ 29ers under the Stumpjumper name. “Take a look at what Fox are doing with their forks [specifically the 34 29er model],” says Sani. “That’s a high-end fork and they’re pretty bullish on it, and if they’re bullish on it, I’d say that’s a segment.”

Is the US bicycle industry too snooty to grow outside of the enthusiast?      

In Europe, and the UK in particular, use of bikes for fitness and transport continues to grow, but America has been slow to follow suit, especially outside of major cities. “The motivation to get out of your car and onto a bike [for transportation] is tied 100 percent to the cost of oil,” says the industry insider we spoke with. “It’s a short-term decision. What happens to oil prices, historically, is that they go up for a while, people scream and bitch and moan, and then they go down part way and people feel good again – never mind they’re paying a quarter more per gallon than they were before.”

A core group of riders centered in the country’s metro and urban areas is using city bikes daily for transport. But usage as a whole is limited due to a lack of cycling infrastructure and the fact that a large number of Americans live more than five miles from where they work, shop and recreate. “These are young, hip, urban people who realize that if you live in San Francisco, Manhattan or Chicago it’s just as easy to do short runs on your bike, use public transportation for slightly longer trips and if you’ve got to go out of town, heck, you rent a car for the weekend,” he says.

“Americans loathe to give up their cars,” says Sani. “If you analyze who buys these kinds of bikes, and I say this in glittery generality, it's somebody who already rides a bike and they’re adding [a commuter bike] to their quiver. We’re not seeing an explosion of Americans saying, 'I need to get a commuter bike so I can ride it to work'. It takes effort and planning… and people will find an excuse not to ride their bike, just as I do, occasionally.”

There’s a compounding problem, according to the statistics. US cyclists are becoming more and more affluent, and this means they're prepared to pay more for bikes. This – along with economic factors such as the rising cost of raw materials and currency fluctuations, and a decline in the number of bikes being sold – has led to price rises, which mean bikes are becoming less relevant to the mainstream American public by the year, especially to those in lower income brackets. “Bicycle riding has become an activity of wealthy Americans, higher income Americans," Jay Townley, of market research firm Gluskin-Townley Group, tells BikeRadar:

'Bicycle riding has become an activity of wealthy Americans'

Townley feels this is a big mistake, especially at a time of increased investment in cycling and walking infrastructure as a way to improve public health. He cites the example of Brown County in his home state of Wisconsin, which he describes as "one of the fattest states in the Union", where something like a third of people are overweight.

"The silver bullets [for a bike boom] – that's the leadership of the industry’s terminology, not mine – are obesity and the onset of diabetes," says Townley. "Those two health issues are going to lead us to a bike boom, we're told. But if you’re not relevant to the people who are obese or have diabetes, they’re not going to buy your bike to solve their problem.”

Townley suggests the industry should put some money into marketing bikes to those groups: “Be relevant to the people that have the health problems that can be helped by bikes." He also says the attitude of many bike shops in the US needs to change, because while staff are good at dealing with cycling enthusiasts, they virtually ignore minorities and women are often shut out.

“We’ve got to get more women on bikes and they want to ride bikes,” he says. “Shimano made a $5 million effort in researching their automatic shifting system to figure out what it was going to take to sell more bikes to middle-aged women in this country, because we don’t – we’re still 80 percent white and male. We don't represent the multicultural diversity of the nation or the gender aspect [of our population].

“Shimano did the industry a great favor, they exposed and gave away a lot of the research when they launched their Coasting product. The big issue is that women who want to get back into cycling don’t want to shift , [some] may be afraid of it. Shimano gave them an answer but the shop rats dissed it. Even Trek couldn’t force it through.”

You can follow BikeRadar on Twitter at twitter.com/bikeradar and on Facebook at facebook.com/BikeRadar.

User Comments

There are 4 comments on this post

Showing 1 - 4 of 4 comments

  • Wow, after work I must go into the garage and say hello to my quiver.

    I suppose it makes a change from, collection, assortment, pile, bunch, heap of bikes .... and sounds kind of military, and Robin Hood like , personally I think if I acrtually spoke like that to a mate they would burst out laughing.

  • Interesting read, especially regarding the attitude of shops. I've found a similar attitude of "if I personally wouldn't ride it, then I'm not interested in discussing it" in some of my local shops. But luckily not all of them.

  • A friend sent this to me and as someone who lives in København and who has also live d in NYC and Toronto, I have to comment.

    There are important infrastucture issues that need to be addressed in the US. You need a place to store your bike safey and out of the weather wherever you go. These places need to be near public transit and that needs to handle bikes. The bike lanes need to be intelligently designed. You need traffic calming - slow speed limits and other ways to discourage cars in dense areas. Some of our bike infrastructure is supported by a gas tax. Cars also must pay for parking in most places including where people work. You need a class of sturdy commuter bikes that last for ten years with minimal work and are reasonably inexpensive - bikes in the US are mostly expensive toys in my opinion and few of the riders are real commuters.

    Here slightly more than half of the riders are woman and you see that in the shops. In the US I find a very macho male attitude in the shops that is very condescending. Those shops wouldn't last a month in Denmark.

    Yes the health issues are very important, but I doubt they are enough to sell the concept. Everyone knows junk foods are bad for you too, but they do very well in the US. You need a very thorough program to encouage bikes and walking for short trips. That took a long time to develop here with lots of support from the government as well as the cities.

  • I used to be a dealer many years ago and am surprised that the many levels of business (and margin) are still in use. There isn't much dealing directly with the manufacturer.

    As for the bicycle business being flat, this is still a very auto oriented society. It is an unusual person who cycles to work. The mass transit is not so wonderful in most cities, so that isn't why. The roads are dominates by autos, with many urban roads being shoulderless especially in the east. East of the Appalachians, the roads are former oxcart trails and Indian paths, and little planning was done to make a sensible road net.

    Many people are understandably afraid to bicycle on current car-centric roads. And too many bike trails, called Multi-Use Paths (MUPs) have dog walkers, runners, and family cyclists who sit in the middle of the trail for extended chats with their very small children also on the trail. This is a problem everywhere, but more so in the east.

    So there have been pushes for more cycling trails and bike lanes. More "share the road" signs and road paint designed to make us safer. But where do we go?

    Where can I safely park my bike downtown for the entire day when I am forced into jury duty? Where can I park my bike at a shopping mall? There are no bike lockers or fenced and guarded areas at any destinations I have short of a bike shop. Bike racks leave a bike exposed and locking to them gives questionable security at best. I would not be a comfortable shopper, I would dash in and out for concern of my bike still being there (in whole or in part) by the time I return.

    Bicycle clothing, the technical sweat-friendly spandex is a big part of the bicycling economy here. It helps cyclists be seen in an unpopular light, as most people who need to bicycle more would never consider such garments in public. And honestly, anyone who knows the basics about bicycle shorts knows that they are clingy underwear with a bit of a pad. The privates are virtually public. Who wants to dress that way to go on a bike? Yet that is what the bike shops push because it has good profit margin. Seen any emperors in their new cycling outfits? This does not help popularity.

    Carbon fiber frames are of no help. Outside of the Jamis Xenith Endura or a custom frame, carbon fiber bikes cannot mount racks, nor can most mount a mudguard. These are race bike for those who do not and often cannot successfully race. They are the playthings of the well-off or the fanatic. American bike shops stock race bikes, hybrids and mountain bikes.

    Tourers, the immensely practical and somewhat sporty bikes are seldom in the showroom and often ignored. Bike shop employees (and too often the shop owners) are completely ignorant about tourers. So Americans often opt for the hybrid because they are not racers (and can admit it) and bike on pavement. And the bike is seen as a toy to ride around the block with the children.

    So between high margin multiple business level prices, auto-centric roadways, little to no safe bicycle parking, trying to dress up the average overweight American in spandex, and offering limited choices in the shops is it a surprise that bicycle business in the USA is flat?

    In the US, bicycling is seen as more of an activity for children or fanatics than a practical application. That is something that the bicycle industry can change, but it hasn't happened yet. It is very sad.

Post a Comment:

You need to login or register to post comments.