Shimano Dura-Ace Di2 electronic transmission review
|$3250
BikeRadar verdict
" Incredibly smooth, precise and reliable shift performance that cable-actuated systems can't match, but hugely expensive and multiple shift performance could be better"
Shopping partners
"A solution to a problem that doesn't exist." "Unnecessary." "A marketing gimmick." Those are lines offered time and again by armchair critics of Shimano's new Dura-Ace Di2 electronic drivetrain, yet few of those pundits have spent any time on the stuff. After our initial sampling last summer in Japan and now two solid months of near-continuous use on a proper test group, we can confidently say that shifting-by-wire doesn't just work; it's flat-out awesome.
Shifting performance that's second to none
Di2's most obvious benefit is its remarkably smooth and precise shifting action, even compared to the most ideally adjusted and tuned mechanical setup from Shimano or any other component manufacturer – yes, even Campagnolo. It hits its target each time, every time, and nails each gear without fail in virtually any condition. If there's such a thing as a tireless 'shift robot', this is it.
Tap the rear upshift button and you're rewarded with that telltale 'ka-chunk' of a perfectly executed change. Go a step in the other direction and the transition is so seamless as to be virtually imperceptible save for the feeling in your legs of an easier ratio. In fact, it's almost too smooth.
Shift action is astounding up front, particularly when used in combination with Shimano's ultra-stiff Dura-Ace chainrings. The Di2 front derailleur faithfully moves the chain onto the big ring – or down to the inner cog – even when mashing the pedals in a low-cadence grind with an uncanny silkiness we've experienced with no other system. Think about how well one-tooth shifts work out back, translate that up front and you've pretty much got the idea.
Even better, however, is that Di2's performance is unflappably repeatable and doesn't degrade over time. Commands issued by the levers are always received and translated exactly as intended at the other end with no 'telephone effect' that can plague cable-actuated systems as a result of cable wear, housing compression or system contamination. Barring things such as a bent hanger, what you get on day one is seemingly what you get every day afterwards.
Is it possible to confuse the system? Yes, but only if you're really trying to. The only way we could get Di2 to miss a step was by doing things we'd never consider doing anyway and even then it sorted itself out impressively quickly.
Weight-wise, there's only a modest penalty to be paid. In comparison to 7900, Di2 only adds about 50g by our measurements – right in line with Shimano's claims.

Why it works the way it does
The key, of course, is the small stepper motor in the front and rear derailleurs that precisely controls their movements, but it's not a matter of how fast they move – in fact, the front derailleur moves slower on average than its mechanical equivalent. Instead, Di2's advantage lies in the fact that it does things automatically that would be impractical on mechanical systems.
For example, Di2's rear derailleur pulleys overshoot the centreline of each cog slightly to help nudge the chain into place – but only momentarily. After a brief pause, the mech centres itself for quieter running. In theory, you could do this with a mechanical system too, and in fact most already do for downshifts anyway. But Di2 does it in both directions, which just isn't possible with conventional ratchet internals.
The front derailleur applies just the right amount of pressure so that the chain moves only at its prescribed gate, rather than muscling it over. Again, you could do this with a mechanical system, too, but it would require you to precisely apply the appropriate amount of force at the lever and then hold it there until the shift is completed – not ideal in the heat of competition. With Di2, you just hit the button and it does the thinking for you, reliably hitting the next available gate.
It's the same story in the other direction as well. Instead of a strong return spring abruptly jerking the chain down at an inopportune position, Di2 smoothly coaxes the chain down to the inner ring at the prescribed release point. Admittedly, Campagnolo's Ergopower system is capable of this as well, unlike mechanical systems from SRAM or Shimano, but again, with Di2 it's only a matter of hitting a button – no extra thought required.

A word on shift speed, too: modern drivetrains rely more than ever on their highly engineered systems of gates, ramps and pins to help move the chain from gear to gear and Di2 is no exception, especially given that it shares its crankset and cassette components with Dura-Ace 7900. As a result, 'shift speed' is strictly speaking more a matter of how quickly the chain encounters one of those gates when a shift is initiated than how fast the derailleur moves, making Di2 no quicker than anything else.
But from a user standpoint Di2 is still faster, since your job is done once you hit the button – at least for single shifts. There's no holding the lever for that split second while the shift is completed or ever-so-slightly nudging the chain over with a hair more force. With Di2, it's tap, shift, tap, shift – and that's it. It's a subtle distinction and one that riders who haven't tried Di2 for themselves will invariably debate, but it's real and noticeable.
Multiple shifts, however, require multiple button pushes. As fast, precise and smooth as Di2 is, it still can't beat some of its mechanical competitors that can execute several shifts with a single lever sweep. And yes, Campagnolo fans, Ergopower definitely wins here.
Ergonomics
With no mechanical guts to occupy room in the lever bodies, Shimano engineers had fewer restrictions in crafting their shape. As a result, the Di2 levers are slimmer in width and smaller in girth than 7900 and have more gently rounded corners that feel more natural in your hands. In fact, they're a much closer approximation of the previous Dura-Ace 7800 generation but thankfully without the sharp dip in the top surface.
Shift button placement is designed to offer a reasonably easy learning curve for current Shimano users, at least when on the hoods. Here, the buttons' fore-aft offset is a familiar layout and their differentiated height and texture are easy enough to tell apart. When in the drops, however, Shimano users accustomed to reaching up for the inboard paddle and to the very tip of the main lever to shift in the opposite direction will be caught out a bit.
Instead of the familiar top-bottom layout, you again have the same fore-aft button offset – the main lever is stationary and you can push on its tip as much as you like but it's not going anywhere. In this situation the buttons' height and texture differences aren't as easy to discern and your fingers have smaller targets to hit from this angle. We got used to it after a few rides but still would have preferred a more natural transition.

In either case, we still want more tactile feedback from the buttons to indicate when a shift has been properly initiated. The exceptionally short button throw is barely a couple of millimetres but the return springs are rather stiff and it's still possible to move the button without hitting the contact points in the switch – the clicks are just too light and inaudible. In contrast, the time trial shifters have far more feedback.
Good luck telling the buttons apart in winter when wearing full-fingered gloves, and the inboard button's paddle is surprisingly flexy. Even without a stronger click, stiffening up this small piece would notably improve the feel.
One key ergonomic advantage with Di2, however, is the option for mounting satellite buttons up on the bar tops. On extended climbs, there's no need to shift hand positions out to the hoods when you need a slightly taller or easier gear.
But I don't want to be stranded with a dead battery!
No discussion about Di2 would be complete without addressing the battery life and we're pleased to report that unless you're an exceptionally neglectful rider in terms of maintenance, it's simply not an issue. On average, Shimano says a full charge will last about 1,600km (1,000 miles) but that's heavily dependent on shift frequency – not to mention the number of front versus rear shifts – and other factors such as temperature.
In practice, we've managed roughly 50 percent better than that on our Colorado testing grounds (where the climbs are long but sharp elevation changes relatively infrequent) and even Garmin team mechanics have admitted to only charging their riders' Di2 batteries once during the entire 2,448km-long (1,521 miles) 2009 Giro d'Italia. Not exactly a short-timer.

A blinking LED lets you know when the battery does eventually start to run out of juice. If you choose to ignore the warning for another few rides, front shifts will give out first but you can still muster about 60 more rear shifts before you're stuck in your last gear (mind you, we did this part of the test on a repair stand, not out on the road).
High mileage riders will likely only have to charge their Di2 batteries once a month or so and assuming the claimed 500-charge lifespan is valid, most riders will be dead and gone before their battery does the same. Our impression is that Shimano could have comfortably halved the capacity but opted for prudence instead. Total charge time from a dead battery is barely over an hour.
And what about weather resistance? Each connection is so tight that you need to use the included tool for both installation and removal so as not to damage the wire. Our first test ride in pouring tropical rain turned out to be a good long-term indicator: even when intentionally blasting the bits with a pressure washer, everything still worked just fine.
Installation
Installation for the first-timer will invariably require at least a scan through the included – and very detailed – manual. But aside from some adjustment nuances, the process is mostly familiar and doesn't take much longer than usual.
Wire routing is an obvious difference and there is definitely some creativity required for a clean-looking finished product. Shimano thankfully include some nifty adhesive cable guides to ease the job and if you're lucky enough to have a mostly black or white frame, they're barely noticeable. Unfortunately there's still a zip-tie required for the down tube-mounted battery holder though.

One quirk about the front derailleur that shouldn't go unmentioned: there's no sensor like on your motorised garage door that notices when something's in its way. When installing the derailleur or making adjustments, watch your fingers. Don't worry; the Di2 front derailleur won't cut them off or anything like that, but the motor does exert a lot of force so be aware.
What if I crash on it?
The rear derailleur has a built-in 'breakaway' feature whereby the body will essentially separate itself from the motorised internals if you happen to dump the bike on that side. It's not a guarantee against damage but it's a nice insurance policy to have just in case (and no, we didn't test it aside from a simulation on the repair stand – it works).
If something more severe occurs, entire components may not always have to be replaced as there are at least a few small parts available such as pulley cages, brake lever blades and the like. Otherwise, though, that brings us to our next concern…
Pricing and compatibility
There's no sugarcoating the issue here; Shimano's Dura-Ace Di2 components are horrifically expensive. The rear derailleur alone retails for £489.99 (US$900) – nearly the cost of an entire SRAM Rival group – the front derailleur is only slightly cheaper at £369.99 ($750) and a pair of shifters fetches £499.99 ($930). And that's not even including the required wiring harnesses (£224.98/$450), the battery (£59.99/$100) or its proprietary charger (£64.98/$120). Add it up (£1,719.92/£3,250) and it's a choice between a fancy Di2 transmission or a decent used car.
Shimano naturally intend Di2 to be filled out with the remaining Dura-Ace 7900 bits and admittedly it seems to work best that way given the brake calipers' modified cable pull ratio and the crankset's ultra-stiff outer chainring. If you're so inclined, other cranksets with standard spacing will work too, as will other brake calipers, though the feel at the lever – and the stopping performance – won't be quite as good.
But no, Di2 won't work with anything out back other than a 10-speed cassette with Shimano spacing (thus including SRAM) and no, we didn't try hacking into the system's 'brain' to make it work with other standards, though we'd imagine someone more tech-savvy could probably pull it off.

Wave of the future
Do current cable-actuated systems work, and work well? Yes, absolutely, and better than ever in most cases. But there's no denying that once you've used Di2, even the best conventional drivetrains seem a tad clunky in comparison.
Shimano Dura-Ace Di2 is not perfect. There are some ergonomic quirks, it's still not the best option for multiple shifts and it's incredibly expensive. But the level of refinement is unlike anything else out there and we would offer up the argument that truly innovative developments usually don't come about by playing it safe and maintaining the status quo. It's not a game changer just yet but it just might be once the technology invariably trickles down and prices drop.
Even more interesting, however, is what this could potentially mean for Shimano's off-road line as the benefits of weather resistance and consistent shift performance would apply even more in that arena.
"It absolutely makes sense for other disciplines. We've already got guys who have been racing with it in cyclo-cross and have done well with it," said Shimano's US press officer Devin Walton. "It makes a lot of sense for mountain bikes but there are a lot more obstacles on a trail. These parts are a lot more expensive to replace and repair, and that's definitely a concern, plus the level of potential contamination steps it up a notch. It makes hypothetical sense but to make the jump into real world execution is a whole other issue."
Fair enough, but we're still willing to bet that the next generation of XTR will come with an electronic variant as well. In the meantime, the road version is here already and it's well worth a try – as long as you've got the money to do so. While we've been somewhat underwhelmed by Dura-Ace 7900, Di2 has blown us away.

|
|
Weight |
Cost |
|
Dual Control shifters, ST-7970 (pair) |
258g |
£499.99 (US$930) |
|
Rear derailleur, RD-7970 |
222g |
£489.99 ($900) |
|
Front derailleur, FD-7970 |
120g |
£369.99 ($750) |
|
Battery, SM-BPR1 |
70g |
£59.99 ($100) |
|
Upper wiring harness, SM-EW79 |
20g |
£84.99 ($170) |
|
Lower wiring harness, SM-EW7970 |
81g |
£139.99 ($280) |
|
Battery charger, SM-BCR1 |
£64.98 inc UK plug ($120) |
What's the score with BikeRadar reviews? You can find a full explanation of our ratings here.
User Reviews
There are 17 reviews on this post
Showing 1 - 17 of 17 comments
-
SDK2007
Posted Mon 17 Aug, 12:47 pm BST Flag as inappropriate
I guess future developments will include programmable macro buttons to enable 'one-press' multiple shifts, even across both front & rear derailleur.
-
Aspman77
Posted Mon 17 Aug, 1:24 pm BST Flag as inappropriate
I'd have thought it wouldn't have been hard to go for wireless signalling and ditch the cable altogether.
-
snellgrove
Posted Mon 17 Aug, 1:48 pm BST Flag as inappropriate
With a Wireless option you'd obviously need a battery in each shifter, each derailleur etc. Not practical!
-
RRPHOTOGRAPHIC
Posted Mon 17 Aug, 3:48 pm BST Flag as inappropriate
I am going to wait for them to bring out the Di3 groupset which can be programmed to change gears at certain power out puts.
The Di3 will probably be linked to the Garmin and power tap rear wheel and heart rate monitor.
Of course the Di4 Groupset will be linked so that the manager in the team car can change gears for the rider.
I guess we will have to wait a lot longer for the Di5 which will be linked up to your brain waves and all you will have to do is think about changing gear and its done.
Frame design will have to now change to enclose the horrible looking battery into the frame.
-
liversedge
Posted Mon 17 Aug, 4:04 pm BST Flag as inappropriate
I'm with RRPHOTOGAPHIC, its just a couple of generations till we get autoshifting, then I'm interested.
-
Global Nomad
Posted Mon 17 Aug, 5:07 pm BST Flag as inappropriate
once more people 'believe' the battery won't let them down this should be the first thing that gets reduced in size.
think mobile phone -- no one wants a phone that goes uncharged for a month - it would be too bulky. every other day or so is fine. So a lighter battery ( loose that 50g) and charging every 300- 500miles should be fine....
-
russwparkin
Posted Mon 17 Aug, 7:44 pm BST Flag as inappropriate
oh go on then, i will do a long term test for you, if you want me to test it send it to me,
-
Jon8a
Posted Mon 17 Aug, 8:39 pm BST Flag as inappropriate
What Global Nomad said. Surely people would buy and use a smaller battery for a race when they only needed on day's worth. That might bring it down below standard cable kit in terms of weight.
Does this leave any room for a complete redesign of shiters,brake levers. Now if they only need to brake they could look for otherways to lay things out.
-
softlad
Posted Mon 17 Aug, 10:22 pm BST Flag as inappropriate
"I'd have thought it wouldn't have been hard to go for wireless signalling and ditch the cable altogether."
that would work well in the peloton, wouldn't it...
-
frankswings
Posted Tue 18 Aug, 2:20 am BST Flag as inappropriate
I got the chance to ride Di2 at my bike shop. The Shimano rep came in set it up in the trainer and they almost had to forcefully remove me from the bike. I swear it is the most awesome thing I have ever ridden. I know a lot of people have said a lot of snide comments, but what I experienced riding it just makes those comments seem really petty. Does it make you faster, no, but the performance is unlike anything you have ever ridden. I would gladly give up my Sram Red for it.
-
beckcd
Posted Tue 18 Aug, 8:43 am BST Flag as inappropriate
Oh to have money.
-
APIII
Posted Tue 18 Aug, 12:44 pm BST Flag as inappropriate
Looks like a good, albeit expensive, step forward. I wonder if the Italians have taken note.
-
deejay.
Posted Tue 18 Aug, 2:11 pm BST Flag as inappropriate
It does look good, and the option for satellite shifters is very interesting: I plan to buy a TT bike for triathlon in 1-2 years (40th birthday pressie) and the possibility to have two sets of shifters, on the brakes and on the extensions, is mouthwatering. They'll need to have fixed sweep shifting by then, as well as feel: I am a Campy fan, and use Record for racing (10V) - Record 'feels' great when shifting, and the feedback is excellent and important. I think I could get over my prejudices here: Di2 makes more sense to me than Super Record 11V. But it's still not as pretty as Record :o(
-
salsarider79
Posted Tue 18 Aug, 9:21 pm BST Flag as inappropriate
I understand it's an incredable system, and I'm sure many people would give their right testicle to own such equipment. I just think it's plain ugly. I'm a fan of pimpy lovelyness, but this just doesn't rock my boat. I'm still in love with campag.
-
roachbiker
Posted Thu 20 Aug, 4:21 pm BST Flag as inappropriate
i agree salsa, its UGLEE! but im sure in a couple of years down the line (when technology & integration prevail) these things will get smaller, blingier & sexier............oh, & a lot cheaper! i suppose if you do get a battery failure it wont be all bad, instant singlespeed!
-
lesmitch
Posted Wed 22 Jun, 10:32 pm BST Flag as inappropriate
dura ace di2 is very very expensive its blind its probably not needed but we still want it and its the best ...................but wait .............theres something better its little brother ultegra di2 half the price and almost as good .........ultegra di2 the new best for cost them ....but wait what will happen in 2012 105 di2 that will be cheaper and almost as good the will always be something better tomorrow you just have to buy the best you can today the best today THE BEST TODAY IS DURA ACE DI2 if only we could afford it
-
roadbikemike
Posted Fri 6 Apr, 4:56 am BST Flag as inappropriate
A lot of advertisements of being able to up and down shift front and rear derailuers, no matter if cruising the flats, heavy sprinting or climbing. I have the Di2 on my SUPERSIX. I cant up or down shift the front derailuer when using more than about 1/4 power, sprinting OR climbing! Whats the deal? Also, it is WAY finicky and a pain to tune in. So far, to me, Di2 is just BLING. Cable operation is by far, more reliable.
Specification
- Name:
- Dura-Ace Di2 transmission
- Built by:
- Shimano
- Price:
- $3250.00
- Features:
- Dual Control shifters, ST-7970 (pair) (258g) Rear derailleur, RD-7970 (222g) Front derailleur, FD-7970 (120g) Battery, SM-BPR1 (70g) Upper wiring harness, SM-EW79 (20g) Lower wiring harness, SM-EW7970 (short) (81g) Battery charger, SM-BCR1
Related links
Also on BikeRadar
Racing

Giro d'Italia 16: Izagirre triumphs to Falzes
Rodriguez remains in maglia...
Fitness

Buyer's guide to cycling energy products
What to look for and when to...
News

Los Angeles launch bike share program
Private bike share funded by...
News

Derby velodrome plans uncertain after change in council leadership
New Labour administration...
News

Pro Bike: Peter Sagan’s Cannondale SuperSix EVO
Custom geometry and a medley...
Magazines

Paris here we come… part deux!
This June Team BikeRadar...































