Over half say UK roads unsafe for cycling

Over half of UK public think roads are not safe for cycling (BikeRadar)
A recent survey by UK cycling and walking charity Sustrans found that 56 percent of those questioned fear urban roads are unsafe to cycle on.The other headline finding of the survey was that 70 percent of respondents want residential speed limits to be dropped to 20 mph to make them safer.
Two thirds of those that don’t cycle regularly would be more likely to cycle on the roads if they were made safer through such changes as lower speed limits, more marked cycle lanes and more care taken by drivers and other cyclists, according to the new survey.
The survey broke down those questioned into various groups to give some interesting results; 63 percent of women but only 49 percent of men came to the 'unsafe' conclusion whilst region by region Northern Ireland was most fearful at 75 percent and Yorkshire the most confident, even though exactly half of respondents from here still felt the fear factor.
Cycling safety: views from the public
Sustrans' figures are backed up by the report Climate Change and Transport Choices conducted on behalf of the Department for Transport in 2011. It found six in ten people in England who are able to ride a bicycle are deterred from cycling to work because they believe that “it’s too dangerous for me to cycle on the roads.”
Removing the fear will not be easy, however. Dave Horton has produced an exhaustive study of the role of fear in limiting the uptake of cycling and concluded three main factors (other than busy traffic) contribute to the fear of cycling - all ironically products of the desire to get more people cycling safely. Horton thinks road safety campaigns, helmet wearing campaigns and the idea that cycling should be 'traffic-free' are all feeding into a wider fear of cycling on the roads and discouraging it.
The Sustrans press release also quotes the recent launching of a campaign by the Times newspaper that specifically aims to put further pressure on politicians to act to make the roads safer for cyclists.
Related articles
The Times' eight point manifesto calls for:
- Legal requirements for lorry safety measures
- A redesign of the country's most dangerous 500 junctions
- A national cycling audit to produce reliable stats
- 2% of Highways Agency budget for cycle routes
- Cycle safety a core part of the driving test
- 20mph default speed limit in residential areas
- Business sponsorship of cycleways
- Every city to have a cycling commisioner or equivalent
The survey and Times campaign come ahead of a Parliamentary debate on cycling safety on Thursday 23 February.
Malcolm Shepherd, Chief Executive for Sustrans, said “People shouldn’t have to feel they’re taking a risk when they travel on two wheels in our towns and cities. This is yet another wake-up call for politicians who must act now to save lives and take the fear out of everyday journeys."
You can follow BikeRadar on Twitter at twitter.com/bikeradar and on Facebook at facebook.com/BikeRadar.
User Comments
There are 6 comments on this post
Showing 1 - 6 of 6 comments
-
fat fignon fan
Posted Tue 21 Feb, 1:19 pm GMT Flag as inappropriate
Great video! I got to see the Fiat advert 4 times, then a black screen...Brilliant
-
dilemna
Posted Wed 22 Feb, 12:11 am GMT Flag as inappropriate
From some one who HAS been knocked down twice, I can confirm that UK roads are indeed a frikin' dangerous to cycle on. Period.
-
Cyberslayer
Posted Wed 22 Feb, 8:17 am GMT Flag as inappropriate
@Dilemna, From someone who HAS been knocked down five times, I still don't see UK roads as being frikin' dangerous to cycle on. There are dangerous drivers and they need educating more than the roads need changing.
-
Curious Yellow
Posted Wed 22 Feb, 10:10 am GMT Flag as inappropriate
Everyday I commute to work I see total gridlock on the A4 on a stretch of road about a mile long. All of those cars almost without exception contain one occupant. If liftsharing/carpooling could be incentivised then you could lessen traffic and make cycling safer by having less vehicles on the road.Agree with the previous points about drivers being the ones who make cycling dangerous. Not the roads. No need to shift blame to road design when there's the simpler explanation of driver incompetence!
-
Lakesman
Posted Thu 23 Feb, 10:47 pm GMT Flag as inappropriate
can't agree with this blanket 20mph limit thing in urban streets . it would reduce the speed differential between cyclists and overtaking motorists - so it would take cars longer to pass a cyclist doing 13mph, and completely impractical to attempt to overtake a cyclist doing 17 but still remain within the limit. try it voluntarily next time you pass a cyclist in your car - very hard not to creep over 20, 25 +. much safer to accelerate clear past the bike *when safe* to do so. education here , not artificially low speed limits please. who wants a truck inching past them going just 2mph faster whilst watching his speedo - not me.
-
SnappyJon
Posted Tue 28 Feb, 11:52 am GMT Flag as inappropriate
@Lakesman
Spot on.
I can see certain high risk pedestrian/cycle areas as being valid locations for very low speed limits, but blanket 20mph urban speed limits will not help.
The UK still needs a serious attitude realignment towards a more positive cycling environment. The roads will only be safer for cyclists when cycling is made a much more valid and important part of the transportation infrastructure. It's still just being paid lip service at the moment.


