UCI allows disc brakes for cyclo-cross

By Matt Pacocha, US Editor | Friday, Jun 18, 2010 7.31pm

The UCI has approved disc brakes for competition in the 2010-’11 cyclo-cross race season. The ban was lifted via a newly issued document entitled, ‘Rule Amendments for Title 1,’ which was posted to USA Cycling’s website late Friday morning.

“I didn’t think that one was going to go through with the UCI,” said Cannondale-cyclocrossworld.com team director, Stu Thorne. “I had heard about all the changes long ago… the biggest thing for us is the tyre width — but the brake think kind of caught me off guard.”

The same document also newly restricts tires used in UCI regulated competition to 33mm at their widest part and reiterates the ban on spikes and studs.

“It’s a huge bonus for us,” said Thorne. “It means a whole bunch of wheels that we don’t have to bring over to Europe. But at the same time I’m suspect that it’s actually going make it so that Sven Nys shows up with fewer wheels. You’re going to see different compounds, different treads; tyre manufacturers are going to go crazy making different things — course specific, weather dependant — and nothing is going to change. Like I said, Sven is going to show up with 20 sets of wheels, it doesn’t really matter.”

The basis for the rule change is to make the sport more approachable, equipment wise, to juniors. Thorne explained, in Belgium the top juniors believed they needed to mirror the iconic rider’s equipment quiver to be competitive, subsequently building a huge barrier to entry, especially on a developmental level.

Thorne believes that whatever the tyre width regulation does to ease the financial burden on privateers will totally be undone by lifting the ban on disc brakes, at least in the short term.

“I can tell you right now, it’s going to be more costly,” he said. “A set of [TRP] EuroX’s will cost you $100… the cost thing goes right out the window with that one.”

Aside from the added cost when comparing the price of a disc brake to a cantilever brake, the change will likely double the number of bikes in the stables of the sport’s highest profile teams and riders.

From a performance standpoint, however, Thorne is on board.

“I don’t think you’re going to see a lot of them this year,” he said. “But moving forward you will; once product managers figure out how to make a lightweight carbon fork with disc tabs.”

For manufacturers, the race is on. It will be a huge attention grab to be the first to outfit a high-profile professional team with the disc compatible frames, forks, wheels and brakes, especially if they're used in the spotlight of a national or World Cup race.

“I hope we can do it,” says Thorne. “What I want to see for our option of the four bikes that we have on the truck [for each team rider], is two bikes with disc brakes and two bikes with cantilevers.”

Who got through to the UCI?

An unconfirmed report pins Shimano and LaPierre bicycles as responsible for the change. The two manufacturers reportedly approached the UCI four or five months ago with a disc equipped cyclo-cross bike and a proposal for the rule change.

“My understanding is that they’re the ones that got this to the finish line, so if that’s the case, then good for them and thanks,” said Avid [SRAM] brake system product manager, Paul Kantor. “Obviously we need to be balls to the wall on development. We do have something scheduled for 2013 already, which seems like it’s far away, but it’s really only one cyclo-cross season away.”

When asked if the scheduled project will be hydraulic, Kantor played coy.

“My opinion would be, yeah,” he said. “We obviously have those mechanicals today that work, they have the right cable pull ratios for road levers, but we’d look to make a lighter version of the mechanical as well to keep the price point down. I think the elite level guys, the Fidea guys, are going to want a full hydraulic sealed system.”

“This is super exciting to us,” said Kantor. “Obviously we’re going to want to talk to our brothers at Zipp, they’re going to be happy to see the brake track moved off the rim; lots to discuss.”

Something to think about is what this latest rule means for all bikes. It may be a decade down the road, but you have to imagine that the UCI’s approval for disc brakes in cyclo-cross is a first step for the technology’s approval for road racing.

“You never know what the UCI is going to do,” said Kantor. “I would have to think that if we as an industry execute this well and we can then start to transfer those performance advantages or at least explain them — why you wouldn’t see this evolve onto a ProTour bike.

“I think of every other vehicle in the world that we make faster, at the same time we improve the braking performance,” said Kantor. “You look at times for Tour stages now and on good days those guys are putting up record average speed times, yet we’re not doing anything to [dramatically] improve their braking performance.”

Thorne summed the situation up succinctly.

“Whoever can get their shit together fastest will get the most out of it,” he said.

The full text of the document, regarding equipment changes:

Rule amendments for Title 1

Wheels of the bicycle may vary in diameter between 70 cm maximum and 55 cm minimum, including the tyre. For the cyclo-cross bicycle the width of the tyre (measured between the widest parts) shall not exceed 33 mm and it may not incorporate any form of spike or stud.

For massed start competitions in the disciplines road and cyclo-cross, only wheel designs granted prior approval by the UCI may be used. Wheels shall have at least 12 spokes; spokes can be round, flattened or oval, as far as no dimension of their sections exceeds 10 mm. In order to be granted approval wheels must have passed a rupture test as prescribed by the UCI in a laboratory approved by the UCI. The test results must show that the rupture characteristics obtained are compatible with those resulting from an impact sustained during normal use of the wheel. The following criteria must be fulfilled:

On impact, no element of the wheel may become detached and be expelled outwards.

The rupture must not present any shattered or broken off elements, or any sharp or serrated surfaces that could harm the user, other riders and/or third parties.

The rupture characteristics must not cause the hub to become separated from the rim in such a way that the wheel becomes detached from the forks.

Without prejudice to the tests imposed by the laws, regulations or customs, standard (traditional) wheels are exempted from the rupture test referred to above. A traditional wheel is deemed to be a wheel with at least 16 metal spokes; the spokes may be round, flat or oval, provided that no dimension of their cross sections exceeds 2.4 mm; the section of the rim must not exceed 2.5 cm on each side.

Notwithstanding this article, the choice and use of wheels remains subject to articles 1.3.001 to 1.3.003.

Related links

(text modified on 1.01.02; 1.01.03; 1.09.03; 1.01.05; 1.07.10).

Freewheels, multiple gears and brakes are not permitted for use on the track during competition or training. Disc brakes are allowed in cyclo-cross training and competition. For races on the road and cyclo-cross, the use of fixed sprocket is forbidden: a braking system that acts on both wheels is required.

(text modified on 1.09.04; 1.01.05; 1.01.09, 1.07.09; 1.07.10).

Further information concerning the rule changes can be found at USA Cycling.com. Stay tuned to BikeRadar.com for updates.

You can follow BikeRadar on Twitter at twitter.com/bikeradar and on Facebook at facebook.com/BikeRadar.

User Comments

There are 23 comments on this post

Showing 1 - 23 of 23 comments

  • Is this an indication of sanity?

  • Since they're making sensible decisions..... maybe a lowering of the weight limit for road bikes? :D:D:D ..... please?!

  • The UCI making coherent decisions, they should all submit a blood sample.

  • I wonder how long it will be before Shimano/SRAM bring out hydraulic road discs?

    Andy

  • whats the point of disc brakes in cyclocross..they're heavier (rotational weight as well), more likely to clog up with mud and the riders have been fine without them so far. A bad move in my eyes.

  • And traveler's were fine before trains and airplanes were invented too! BTW, I've never, EVER had disc brakes clog with mud on my mtb. Can't wait to see the new tread designs! Let the late braking commence!

  • I thought the UCI was incapable of making reasonable decisions. Racing is often the proving ground for consumer level products, and I would love to see Hyro-brifters.

    @TriTimmy Disc brakes do not increase the rotational weight as most of the weight is at the hub, in fact they may reduce it as you no longer need rims that have a braking surface. The weight penalty may come as a result of having a beefy fork to prevent brake shudder. In my experience, disc brakes do not clog with mud and are far superior in those conditions.

  • @Mayloo more likely to clog up with mud....

    It's obvious You never ever use a disc brake.

  • sorry trtimothy

    I mean @trtimothy

    Just to remember last years Giro and LA asking why we haven't disk brakes in our bikes? Interesting how much time take UCI to allow disc on road....

  • Fantastic news... I don't really care about cyclocross as I don't race it, but this means road-style frames and forks with disc brakes will become available which will be wonderful for winter trainers and commuting bikes.

  • Next on the to-do list... UCI approval for disc brakes on road bikes. Bring it on!

  • I know a lot of CX racers (pro/am) are very "Canti's make sense" and the hole "33mm of tread and all the power of a disc doesn't make sense" etc. etc. etc.

    However, the one good thing I can see coming out of this is better disc brakes designed for STI levers! Avid's BB7 has been a lonely option for quite some time now. I'm guessing that lighter, less powerful (in comparison to MTB cable discs), possibly smaller rotor options will become available. In which it would make far more sense for a CX/Commuter bike.

    And as mentioned- CX frames that we can use everywhere without worrying about shudder or squeal!

  • Other benefits of discs:-

    1. Running through a 2in deep puddle doesn't affect the braking surface.

    2. You can buckle the wheel (slightly) without affecting braking - doesn't matter so much if your rim isn't 100% true.

    3. By braking, you aren't wearing out the sidewall of your rims.

    4. One finger braking.

    5. Stopping on a six-pence.

  • the statement of rotational weight doesn't apply as the wheel can be built lighter by not having to include a machined braking surface,...... disk brakes clogging up? have you ever ridden off road?

  • Who are these posters who keep saying things like "Disks clog up...increase rotation mass...etc.."?

    Discs wont clog up....name me one major sport that involves mud that doesn't have dics brakes..rallying, MTB, scrambling etc... Think about it, discs cut mud; cantis collect mud.

    Weight. The rims will be much lighter, better aero profiles, much less weight in the rims. The extra weight will be in the centre near the hub and fork, but that will be offset by extra braking efficiency. The day of tubeless tyres being standard is ever nearer....or do you want to ban tyres without innertubes?

    Can't wait for a disc braking system on a half decent road bike.

  • The major benefit is for those people with hybrids who are disc only with 700c wheels and that's mainly for commuters, maybe also the introduction of stronger wheelsets like what has happened with XC MTB...

  • The best thing for me about disks is they behave exactly the same wet as when dry.

    But there are some prices to pay

    * something else to get bent in a crash

    * you can wear through a set of pads in a single descent of morzine in a thunderstorm

    * every disk brake model has its own custom pad, makes replacement trickier than popping into a shop in the alps and getting a v-brake replacement.

    And in town

    * makes your bike look more valuable and more likely to get stolen

    * disk brakes are valuable enough on their own they may get nicked

    * get in the way of front mudguards

  • Disk brakes for cyclocross bikes are allready around. And the performance

    are just twice as good compared to cantilever brakes!!

    http://www.genesisbikes.co.uk/bikes/cross/croix-de-fer/croix-de-fer/overview/

  • Why bother whether disk brakes are better or worse for cyclocross. Both rim and disk brakes are allowed now, so within a few years we'll know for once and for all what is best. Let the best technology win.

    Maybe we can use the same method to end the discussion between recumbent and upright road bikes ;-)

  • @ligfietser

    Exactly - if there are people that think discs are too heavy/susceptible to mud/bring bad karma/ate my hamster then fine, stick with the cantis - no-one's outlawing them.

  • @gps4sport.com @azi

    What are you guys talking about?

    Disc brakes for road bikes are already allowed by UCI today; in fact they have never been banned by UCI for road races, only cyclo-cross races (and track where no brakes are allowed).

    Just because no raod team use disc brakes doesn't mean it's because they are banned, they simply just see no overall benefit of using them as it means slower wheel changes and heavier bikes. Maybe sometime in the future road team will use disc brakes.

    But if one team started using disc brakes they couldn't get any spare wheel from neutral support as these doesn't have discs.

    If you read the UCI CYCLING REGULATIONS about the disc brake ban, there's no mentioning of disc brakes being banned for road races, but only for cyclo-croos.

    UCI CYCLING REGULATIONS

    Part I: General organisation of cycling as a sport

    (version on 04.02.10)

    http://www.uci.ch/includes/asp/getTarget.asp?type=FILE&id=34033

    Quote: "1.3.025 Freewheels, multiple gears and brakes are not permitted for use on the track during competition or training.

    Disc brakes are forbidden in cyclo-cross training and competition.

    For races on the road and cyclo-cross, the use of fixed sprocket is forbidden: a braking system that acts on both wheels is required.

    (text modified on 1.09.04; 1.01.05; 1.01.09, 1.07.09)."

  • One other major advantage of discs, is that you can invest in a decent set of rims and wheel build as they are not going to be ground away. Craziness having expensive rims and then just rubbing them away.

  • I have a focus CX bike with disc brakes.

    Pros are that braking performance is fantastic and they never get clogged up. The only time I have to stop is to clean any blockages aroung the bottom bracket. No rim wear either.

    However, the bike is heavy as the weight of the rotors and calipers are much greater - that might just be down to the model setup on mine.

    I remember doing a CX race in the lakes last year where we were shin deep in mud and I never had to stop once. There were loads of people stopping to unclogg the crap around their cantis and I was just sailing past them all - finished quite high for me all because of the brake setup.

Post a Comment:

You need to login or register to post comments.