Bikil 2400 review: a genuinely usable MTB front light, but can you get away with spending this little?
Our team independently selects products featured in our editorial content. Some articles may contain affiliate links and we may earn a small commission through them. For more information, please see our Affiliates FAQ

Bikil 2400 review: a genuinely usable MTB front light, but can you get away with spending this little?

Big battery life for remarkably little money

Our rating

2.5

34.97

Scott Windsor / Kelsey Media


Our review
Incredibly cheap and easy to use, but its narrow, comparatively weak beam limits it to slower, less technical riding

Pros:

Extremely cheap; straightforward controls; mount is more secure than its price suggests

Cons:

Weaker usable beam than rivals; narrow spread limits confidence and riding speed

SQUIRREL_14045002

At only £34.97, the Bikil 2400 is far cheaper than most dedicated mountain bike lights and has a claimed output of more than 2,000 lumens.

Its integrated 6,400mAh battery, USB-C charging and simple bar mount make the specification look impressive for the money, too.

However, claimed brightness figures don’t tell you how useful a light will be on the trail, and the Bikil’s beam limits how hard you can ride once things get faster or more technical.

Bikil 2400 at a glance

  • Claimed output: 2,400 lumens  
  • Integrated 6,400mAh battery  
  • Three LEDs  
  • Weight: 246g  
  • USB-C charging  
  • Claimed IPX5 water resistance  
  • Max power runtime: 2hr 7mins  

Bikil 2400 performance

Front view of a Bikil 2400 mountain bike light showing its three LED lenses while resting on moss.
The Bikil 2400 uses three LEDs, but they don't pack the punch of the claimed 2,400 lumens. Scott Windsor / Kelsey Media

At £34.97, the Bikil 2400 is an extremely cheap mountain bike light and it's inevitable there will be some compromises at that price point.

On the trail, the compromise is the beam. Despite a claimed 2,400-lumen maximum output, it was by far the weakest light of the group I tested together.

That judgement is based on what reaches the trail. Whatever the headline number, the Bikil doesn’t light up enough ground to inspire confidence.  

Its biggest limitation is the beam shape. The light is concentrated into a narrow central area with a fairly abrupt edge, leaving the sides of the trail much darker.

On straightforward tracks, the central spot provides enough light to see where you’re going, but once the trail starts twisting the lack of peripheral beam spread becomes obvious. Corner exits are harder to pick up early and the view ahead can feel tunnel-like.  

That affects speed. I could ride comfortably on easier trails, but I had to back off notably when things were more challenging. Fast, open descents expose the lack of reach and width most clearly.  

On steeper, technical ground, it works better when your chosen line stays directly ahead, although searching for an alternative line quickly highlights the narrow spread again.  

Trail detail within the lit area is reasonable, but foreground illumination could be better because roots and rocks cast longer shadows close to the wheel. Its slightly rose-tinted colour is pleasant, although it doesn’t give the same crisp contrast as rival lights.

Bikil 2400 front light held in a hand with its illuminated top-mounted control button visible.
The Bikil keeps things simple, with a large top-mounted button and colour-changing battery indicator that’s easy to see while riding. Scott Windsor / Kelsey Media

The mount is a pleasant surprise. It’s easy to fit, the clip-in connection feels secure and the light can be rotated to help positioning. There was a little vibration on rough ground, but it stayed in place.  

The controls are simple, too, with six modes and a main button that is easy to use when wearing MTB gloves. You have to cycle through the settings, though, and the green/red battery indicator is basic.  

The aluminium-bodied light has three LEDs, a 6,400mAh battery, USB-C charging and a claimed IPX5 water-resistance rating. During testing, it remained at maximum power for around 2hrs 7mins, which is impressive.  

For occasional use on easy trails or gravel, the Bikil is a remarkably cheap option. For faster or more technical MTB riding, its narrow, weaker beam asks you to slow down too much.  

How we tested

I tested the Lezyne alongside three rival integrated-battery MTB lights, riding them back to back over the same mix of trails, from easy greens to technical blacks. These included fast descents, tight singletrack, rough rooty sections, steep climbs and slower terrain.

I compared beam reach, width, shape and colour, along with how clearly each light revealed trail texture as speed increased. I also assessed mount security, controls and battery information while riding in gloves.

For the runtime test, each light was fully charged and run at maximum power until it dropped noticeably into a lower-output mode, rather than simply timing how long it remained illuminated.

Lights tested

Bikil 2400 bottom line

Bikil 2400 mountain bike front light and black handlebar mount resting on moss.
The handlebar clamp is simple, but surprisingly secure for the money. Scott Windsor / Kelsey Media

The Bikil’s biggest achievement is giving you a genuinely usable rechargeable MTB light for less than £35. Its 2hrs 7min maximum-power runtime is excellent and the mount and controls work better than the price suggests.

However, the narrow beam, limited peripheral light and relatively weak usable illumination mean it can’t match the confidence offered by more expensive lights.

It’s good enough for easier trails, gravel and riders who just want an affordable route into night riding, but if you frequently ride fast or technical singletrack, spending more gets you a much more useful beam.

SQUIRREL_14045002

This website is owned and published by Kelsey Media. www.kelsey.co.uk
© Kelsey Media 2026