Trek Cronus CX review

A first edition carbon cyclo-crosser that rises to the top

Our rating 
5.0 out of 5 star rating 5.0
USD $3,849.99

Our review

Trek have built a top-tier carbon ’cross bike that balances performance and price, perfectly
Skip to view product specifications

Trek may be late to the game of cyclo-cross bikes but the 2012 Cronus CX has been worth the wait.


Carbon cyclo-cross bikes are a tricky subject for a bike manufacturer. They’re generally second bikes (to riders) and their sales volume is low, so there’s less of an incentive to spend resources developing them. Still, they take considerable effort to engineer properly and the investment manufacturers make is apparent in the end product.

Somehow, Trek have outdone just about all of their competition by producing a frame and fork that are smartly designed to capitalize, completely, on carbon’s properties, while also offering component dress worthy professional racing on any continent. Trek have done this at a price that’s not cheap by any means but competes with many carbon bikes specced with lower level components.

The new cronus cx is race ready out of the box:
Matt Pacocha

The new Cronus CX is race ready out of the box

Ride and Handling: not the smoothest, but it’s an efficient bike that carves

In our opinion, ultimate stiffness is not the way to go for a cyclo-cross bike. A harsh ride leads to fatigue and fatigue makes you slow – but you still need the bike to be efficient. While Trek’s Cronus CX isn’t the smoothest carbon bike we’ve ridden, nor is it the stiffest, it is at the top of the class where the hairs of better and best may be split.

The Cronus CX does an excellent job of mixing attributes of damping rough terrain, and that awesome feeling of carving corners. It balances these handling characteristics with the opposing traits of solid steering stiffness, the fork’s ability to resist brake chatter and enough pedaling stiffness to really feel like your power is being efficiently transferred to the rear wheel. Some might accuse the frame of being too muted, which is a possible way to describe it, but in our experience that muted feel also tends to be pretty darn quick, off-road.

The e2 tapered head tube offers plenty of steering stiffness:
Matt Pacocha

The e2 tapered head tube offers plenty of steering stiffness

The geometry of the Cronus CX contributes to the bike’s ability to carve. It’s an American style bike with neutral angles; our 54cm model sports a 72° head, 73.6° seat angles, a lower bottom bracket (measured: 27.2cm high/6.5cm drop), and 43cm chainstays. It has a taller head tube too, at 145mm, which provides an upright position without using a lot of spacers. The only instances were we struggled with the geometry were bunny hopping and jumping (i.e. table tops and doubles) and it seemed more due to the overall dimensions, versus the geometry and made us think that we might rather be on the size smaller (52cm) bike, since we straddle the two sizes.

We tested the Cronus CX over an eight-month period, but one that fell squarely outside of the cyclo-cross season. In an effort to assess the bike’s overall capabilities we rode it in a variety of terrain and situations. We did moderate length road rides up to about three hours, with plenty of climbing and descending. We rode mountain bike trails on it, and we simulated cyclo-cross in city parks. We even raced it, but in a local short track mountain bike race, rather than the intended discipline.

Over all of these scenarios we rode the Cronus CX completely stock, even when racing, and it impressed us with its capabilities. Even the rather narrow 34mm Bontrager CX0 tires performed well on rough and bumpy off road situations.

Excellent clearance, and avid’s excellent cantilever:
Matt Pacocha

Excellent clearance for Bontrager’s 34mm CX0, and Avid’s excellent cantilever

Racing a short track on the bike allowed it to shine in a stressful race fueled situation. There were multiple corners where we achieved that carving feeling and surprisingly we finished in the top third of the field, which was made up completely of mountain bikes.

Frame: capitalizing on carbon for both ride and design features

The ride quality is top-notch for cyclo-cross, but as important may be the carbon frame and fork’s feature set. This includes the internal cable routing, which allows the option of partial and full length housing; the bridgeless rear chainstays, which offer and amazing amount of mud clearance due to the wide BB90 bottom bracket shell they sprout from, and a huge benefit over those ’cross bikes that use a standard threaded bottom bracket or those using a BB30 design. The frame also sports a tapered head tube and hidden integrated mounts for Gary Fisher designed fenders.

The tapered carbon fork with an alloy steerer is nearly as impressive. It weighs 458g, offers ample mud clearance, and a decent amount of give, but without a hint of chatter. The fork uses Gary Fisher’s FCC (Fisher Control Column) dropout design (large faces on the dropouts), which mate with the oversized 25mm axle end caps and definitely increase the steering stiffness of the system. It’s important to note that the wheel itself is not compatible with non-FCC forks but FCC forks are backward compatible with all standard quick-release wheels.

The massive 25mm end-caps on the fcc front hub seemed to add stiffness to the system:
Matt Pacocha

The massive 25mm end-caps on the FCC front hub seemed to add stiffness to the system

The crown mounted brake boss with integrated barrel adjuster undoubtedly helps keep the chatter at bay, but also gives cleaner routing and an additional adjustment point for the cable tension, both of which are useful and appreciated.

The carbon frame is of monocoque construction and Asian made, which doesn’t detract from its performance but aids in keeping the price lower than an OCLV road model with comparable components.

Equipment: we could not have spec’d this bike better ourselves

If the Cronus CX frame and fork is in the running for our top three carbon cyclo-cross frames currently available, it’s the component specification that really puts this package over the top.

Out of the box the Cronus CX is almost perfectly specced for actually racing ’cross. The SRAM Force group is arguably the best available for the discipline. The shifters hold up in adverse conditions better than the competition and they’re fully rebuildable should they fail. The brake levers offer a higher mechanical advantage than others, as to offer better power to weak cantilever brakes.

They included the right brakes too; Avid’s Shorty Ultimate is the best cantilever brake currently on the market, if set up properly, of course. We ran both front and rear in the narrow profile, and they offered great power and good rim clearance.

Front tire clearance is ample, too:
Matt Pacocha

Avid’s Shorty Ultimate lives up to its name

While we would have preferred to see the in-line Force crank included as part of the kit, the S900 non-series carbon crank is at least specced with a 130BCD and chainring ratios of 38/46-teeth. A pet peeve of ours is the specification of a compact crank on a cyclo-cross bike. Some project managers don’t realize that you run up the steep hills in cyclo-cross thus rendering a 36-tooth chainring useless.

SRAM’s s900 crank comes with a 130bcd spider and proper 38/46-tooth cyclo-cross rings:
Matt Pacocha

SRAM’s S900 crank comes with a 130BCD spider and proper 38/46-tooth cyclo-cross rings

While we might not go out of our way to spec Bontrager’s cockpit components on a different bike, Trek got the style and materials right for ’cross: alloy bar and stem and carbon seat post. All performed flawlessly during our testing: the bars and stem weren’t too stiff, and the carbon post damped bumps better than an alloy equivalent.

The Bontrager Race Lite FCC wheelset is decidedly workhorse, and serves well as a training or racing wheelset. As we’ve mentioned, there is a tangible benefit to the 25mm FCC front axle in terms of stiffness. The wheelset proved plenty stiff and with roughly 32psi and 35psi (front/rear) in the Bontrager CX0 tires, which were surprisingly supple, we found the wheels were reasonably comfortable.

The Bontrager tires were, possibly, one of the biggest performance surprises of the bike. They were so supple that we were forced to use a gauge to set pressure as our finger check consistently put us higher than we needed. Traction wise the tires were also impressive, holding a line in everything from dry, loose-over-hard surfaces to serious mud (albeit thin, non-packing mud). They’re great all-round tires.


Despite the good performance offered by the tires, a tubular wheelset and tire combo is the one upgrade most will want, and will allow the bike to truly perform to its fullest.

Product Specifications


Name Cronus CX
Brand Trek

Description top-tier carbon cyclo-cross bike
Trail 6.8
Rear Wheel Weight 1896
Rims Bontrager Race Lite
Saddle Bontrager Affinity 3, chromoly rails
Seat Angle 73.6
Seatpost Bontrager Race X Lite ACC, 27.2mm, 20mm offset
Shifters Force
Stem Bontrager Race X Lite, 31.8mm
Weight (kg) 7.94
Rear Tyre Bontrager
Wheelset Race Lite
Weight (lb) 17.52
Brake Levers Force
Bottom Bracket Height (cm) 27.2
Chainstays (cm) 43
Seat Tube (cm) 54.8
Standover Height (cm) 79.9
Top Tube (cm) 53.7
Rear Tyre Size 700x34C
Rear Hub Race X Lite
Manufacturer's Description This new carbon bike changes the Cyclocross landscape, exceeding expectations and delivering unexpected features. Lighter frame, exceptional stiffness, the best handling, and additional race utility.
Frame Weight 1147
Bottom Bracket Force
Brakes Avid Shorty Ultimate
Cassette SRAM PG-1070, 11-28
Chain PC-1070
Cranks S900
Fork Bontrager Race X Lite Cross, E2 alloy steerer
Fork Weight 458
Frame Material carbon
Front Derailleur Force
Rear Derailleur Force
Front Hub FCC
Front Tyre Bontrager
Front Tyre Size 700x34C
Front Wheel Weight 1288
Grips/Tape Bontrager gel cork
Handlebar Bontrager Race Lite Anatomic-C
Head Angle 72
Headset Type Cane Creek IS-2 for E2 Integrated
Wheelbase (cm) 100.7