Convertible mountain bike helmets offer versatility on the trail with the protection of a full-face helmet and the ventilation of an open-face lid in one package – you’re essentially getting two great helmets for the price of one.
While a full-face offers better protection for the downs, there’s no way you’d want one on the ups. So, pedal up the hill in open-face mode before clipping the removable chin bar on so that you’re better protected as gravity takes over.
As with anything that’s designed to be two things in one, there’s always going to be some degree of compromise. Generally speaking, convertible enduro helmets tend to be a little heavier in open-face guise than a regular trail lid because they need extra structural elements to ensure they can safely be turned into a full-face helmet.
And when they’re in their descending configuration, they don’t always feel as solid or robust as a full-on downhill lid, even though most convertible helmets (including all those tested here) meet the ASTM F-1952 DH racing safety standard.
Finally, don’t forget, when the helmet’s not in full-face mode, you need to carry the chin bar somehow.
As ever, we’ve taken all of these factors into consideration in a bid to make your buying decision that bit easier.
Bell Super DH MIPS
So good… Bell’s Super DH feels like a full-on downhill full-face (although it’s not quite as solid-feeling as the Giro Switchblade), with firm, rather than plush, padding. Unlike the brand’s cheaper Super 3R convertible lid it’s DH-certified and uses the latest MIPS Spherical brain-protecting technology. It’s comfy on your head, and venting in its full-face configuration isn’t too bad at all.
The chin bar is light and shallow enough to be clipped onto a pack without any drama, despite being one of the biggest on test. Fixing it onto the open-face lid is easy enough and the three locking clasps give a reassuringly positive ‘snap’ once they’re closed properly. It’s worth whipping the Super DH off your head to fit the chin bar though because it’s a little fiddly. In open-face mode, the Bell helmet offers a head-hugging fit, with a brim that drops low around the ears and covers your temples.
The retention cradle tightens evenly, and we had no comfort issues when wearing it as an open-face lid on longer, sweaty rides. While it’s by no means the lightest helmet, it feels stable and its weight is distributed well.
No good… The thin strap can tangle quite easily, which makes lining up the FidLock buckle tricky if you’re wearing gloves or have cold hands. It also sits quite close to your neck so we’d like to see a bit of extra padding to boost comfort even further.
Giro Switchblade MIPS
So good… This feels the most like a regular full-face of all the helmets here, and is easily one of the comfiest. The snug fit makes for a confident feel and, with the large adjuster dial cinched up, we had no issues with it moving around on really rough trails. In open-face mode, it has the most head coverage, which, coupled with the MIPS liner, should keep your bonce well-protected.
We’re big fans of the double D-ring closure and padded strap, which is slower to use but very secure and less fiddly than some of the FidLock-equipped lids here, which use thin straps that twist easily. It also means it’s really comfy (if a little sweaty) once done up.
One of the big plus points with the Switchblade is the size of the chin bar. It’s the smallest on test by far, which means carrying it is much easier than some here and it’ll fit inside a pack – something few others here can boast.
Attaching it is simple enough too (and doable when on your head), just requiring accurate alignment of the metal lugs before clicking it down into place. It’s a plus that Giro includes more padding and a spare peak too.
No good… All that open-face helmet coverage means it’s not only the heaviest lid here in that mode, it’s the sweatiest too. Some testers noted that the big adjuster wheel could be felt at the base of the neck at extreme angles, and we’d like a more positive click from the chin bar on engagement.
So good… The Mainline from Smith is downhill certified and can be used for multiple disciplines, which does make its high price tag look more appealing.
There’s a MIPS liner inside, which is claimed to help protect your brain from angular impacts. It’s available in three sizes and you get three different size pad sets bundled in to ensure a secure fit.
It’s an ideal choice for those looking for some extra protection while trail riding or enduro racing.
There’s a D-ring closure, which takes a little longer to fasten than magnetic designs, but the padded strap means it’s really comfortable.
Open vents around the chin mean the Mainline never feels claustrophobic when you’re breathing hard, and on cooler days I didn’t bother removing it for the climbs.
No good… At 830g for a size medium it is weighty, not that it detracts from the comfort.
MET Parachute MCR
So good… MET was one of the first brands to bring out a convertible helmet, with the original Parachute, but the new MCR (Magnetic Chin bar Release system) is a big departure from its previous lids.
It looks far chunkier and more solid than the last convertible iteration, which many will appreciate – along with the inclusion of a MIPS liner and an easy-to-remove/replace chin bar. In its open-face configuration, the Parachute vents reasonably well, offers a decent level of coverage and, thanks to the finely-indexed Boa dial that adjusts the retention cradle, delivers a well-tensioned and really comfy fit.
Attaching the chin bar is quick and hassle-free – it’s one of the few here that we could remove or replace without taking the whole helmet off (just about). As a full-face, the Parachute feels properly solid, stable and really comfy. While it’s not the coolest, airflow isn’t too bad. We like the long peak, which is really flexible and thus less likely to snap in transit.
No good… There’s unfortunately no getting around the fact that you need to loosen the Boa dial completely before taking the helmet off or putting it back on. If you don’t do so, it’s a bit of an uncomfortable squeeze to get your head past the retention cradle.
Sweet Protection Arbitrator
So good… Sweet Protection hasn’t economised on safety or protection with the Arbitrator. Its quality and sturdiness make this one of the most solid-feeling helmets on test – you wouldn’t know it was a convertible lid in a blind test. The ratchet-style closure on the chin bar is easy to release, and comfier than the FidLock magnetic buckle on the Leatt, MET and Bell helmets. There are separate straps to use in open-face mode, which can be tucked away.
The carbon chin bar attaches using lugs, locater tabs and a clip that can be locked in place once fixed on. While the connecting clip is stiff, it’s solid once clamped in. Sweet Protection includes a MIPS liner to protect against rotational impacts. Venting across the brow is decent enough, although it still gets pretty sweaty when you’re working hard, even in the open-face configuration.
No good… While the overall weight didn’t bother us in full-face mode, without the chin bar you really notice it. We found we had to crank up the retention cradle to keep it secure when tackling rough trail sections. The vertical adjustment on the retention cradle can shift accidentally sometimes too.
The stiff locking clip at the rear takes some thumb strength to secure early on when reattaching the chin bar, although Sweet Protection ensures us that this gets easier the more you’ve done it. Once removed, the chin bar is the bulkiest to carry.