The products mentioned in this article are selected or reviewed independently by our journalists. When you buy through links on our site we may earn an affiliate commission, but this never influences our opinion.

Best climbing bikes 2022 | Lightweight bikes for when the road points upwards

The top lightweight and aero rigs for climbing

Best climbing bikes

The best climbing bikes, of course, boast light weight. But a modern lightweight bike has to prove itself not solely through a lack of grams on the scales, but also by having the aerodynamics to up your ride speed. In fact, for most riding conditions, aerodynamics is more important than weight, although there’s a definite buzz in riding a fast, flyweight machine.


Even if a lack of grams helps you get to the top of a hill quicker, you’ve still usually got to get down the other side, where those watts saved will come into their own. Aerodynamics will help you on the flat too.

Best climbing bikes: what to look for


It perhaps goes without saying, but when you’re riding uphill, gravity is always trying to pull you back down.

Reducing the total rider plus bike system weight means less energy (or power, in cycling parlance) is required to maintain a given speed while climbing.

Therefore, if you want to ride uphill faster, or simply make the hills a little easier, a lightweight bike is an obvious move.

It’s for this reason we see hill-climb obsessives chopping and changing practically every component to bring their overall bike weight down to its lowest possible limit.

The only issues are that high-end, lightweight bikes and parts can be eye-wateringly expensive, and the weight-weenie bug can be hard to shake once you get started. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.


Until fairly recently, climbing bikes made no concessions to aerodynamics. But with the rise of computer modelling, on-bike aero sensors and other advanced testing techniques, this has all changed.

Even dedicated climbing bikes are now launching, with brands touting their aerodynamic efficiency.

Take the Trek Emonda, for example. Trek says it has been designed specifically for the rigours of iconic Tour de France climbs such as Alpe d’Huez (a 13.85km monster in the French Alps), yet still features extensive aero treatment.

We won’t deny there’s usually a minor weight penalty associated with such aero features, but clearly brands have deduced that, on balance, it’s worth it.

We’ll discuss this particular issue in more detail in our buyer’s guide at the end of the article, so keep reading once you’ve considered all the reviews.

Now, onto the best climbing bikes today.

Cannondale SuperSix EVO Hi-Mod Disc Dura-Ace Di2

5.0 out of 5 star rating
A virtuoso of a bike uphill and down, and always at speed.
David Caudery / Immediate Media
  • Fast, comfortable road bike with excellent spec and wonderful handling
  • Comes at a high price, and the extra payment needed to activate the power meter is irritating
  • Price: £9,000 / $11,500 / €10,499 / AU$12,999 (as tested)

The successor to one of the most renowned carbon climbing bikes, Cannondale’s latest evolution of the SuperSix EVO Hi-Mod broke with tradition and added features such as aerodynamic tube shapes and components, and disc brakes.

Yes, these features have added a little weight, but being built around a frame and fork that weigh 866g (56cm) and 389g respectively, this top-end build is still competitive in the weight department.

Our size 58cm test bike weighed 7.51kg, and that’s with aero wheels, 25mm tyres, an aero cockpit and a spider-based power meter.

The obvious downside is the price, but those less willing to part with such lofty figures might also consider the Cannondale SuperSix EVO Carbon Disc Ultegra, which comes in at a third of the price but only weighs around 800g more.

There are also three women’s-specific builds available, built around the cheaper, non Hi-Mod frameset.

  • Weight: 7.51kg (58cm)
  • Gearing: 52/36, 11-30

Giant TCR Advanced SL 0 Disc

5.0 out of 5 star rating
The latest version of the TCR only enhances the model’s reputation as a race-bike leader.
Russell Burton / Immediate Media
  • Light, stiff and responsive race bike
  • Top spec with SRAM Red AXS and Cadex carbon wheels
  • Price: £9,699 / $11,000 / AU$13,499 (as tested)

The TCR has long been a benchmark for race bikes and the ninth generation of the bike remains a top performer, winning our Superbike of the Year competition in 2021.

While the TCR comes in many variants to suit different budgets, the Advanced SL 0 model is unapologetically high-end and its frameset sports an integrated seatpost with a topper rather than a conventional one.

With a full SRAM Red eTap AXS wireless groupset and carbon wheels from Giant’s in-house brand Cadex, it’s ready to race out of the box and is properly light.

Bianchi Specialissima

4.5 out of 5 star rating
Stunning ride quality in a lightweight bike with aero tube profiles.
Dave Caudery / Our Media
  • Great mix of speed, handling, control and smoothness
  • Top spec, but the wheels are a bit of a disappointment
  • Price: £11,206 / $11,626 / €11,449 (as tested)

The Bianchi Specialissima is a bike that’s gone from round tubes to aero profiles in its latest iteration, also gaining disc brakes and hiding the hoses, while still ticking the lightweight boxes with a 750g frame and 370g fork. You could lose another 80g by opting for black paint instead of celeste.

Bianchi incorporates Countervail anti-vibration tech into the frame and the bike comes with Shimano Dura-Ace 12-speed shifting and other top-notch kit. The Vision SC 40 carbon tubeless wheels feel a little low-value compared to the rest of the spec though (even at £11,000).

The ride is a mix of responsiveness with great handling, while also composed, smooth and more comfortable than some bikes with tyres wider than the Specialissima’s 26mm Pirellis.

  • Weight: 7.2kg (59cm)
  • Gearing: 50/34, 11-30

Focus Izalco Max 9.7 AXS

4.5 out of 5 star rating
The ride is brilliant – firm yet forgiving.
David Caudery / Immediate Media
  • Racy-handling and fast-feeling road bike
  • Decent value compared to the competition
  • Price: £5,699 / €6,199 / AU$8,999 (as tested)

Similar to many other bikes in this category, Focus has evolved its Izalco platform to be more well-rounded.

The latest version takes both weight and aerodynamics into account, but doesn’t go so far as to ignore practicality completely – the aero cockpit, for example, uses a standard stem and handlebar setup to make fit adjustment and maintenance a little easier.

At 7.9kg (size large), it’s not the lightest bike we’ve ever tested, but this does include 50mm-deep aero wheels and, with a frame weight of just 890g (claimed), it could certainly be lightened up considerably with a few weight-weenie optimisations.

There’s also a slightly cheaper version, the Izalco Max Disc 8.8, that has Ultegra R8000 mechanical gears, but performed similarly well in our testing.

  • Weight: 7.9kg (large)
  • Gearing: 48/36, 10-28

Lapierre Xelius SL 9.0

4.5 out of 5 star rating
The Lapierre Xelius SL 9.0 is the French brand’s take on the jack of all trades road bike.
Dave Caudery / Our Media
  • Good-value spec
  • Racy geometry leads to sharp handling
  • Price: £7,399 / €7,799 (as tested)

Another lightweight bike with aero features, the Xelius nevertheless stands out thanks to the design of its seatstays. The navy blue fade glitter paintjob looks stunning and the racy geometry leads to sharp handling.

If you’re at either extreme of the size range, the five sizes available may not work for you though.

The spec is really good for the price, with 12-speed Dura-Ace Di2, a carbon bar and stem and Lapierre’s own-brand carbon wheels with 25mm Continental GP5000 tyres that measure 27mm on the 47mm-deep, 21mm internal-width rims.

Merida Scultura Team

4.5 out of 5 star rating
The Merida Scultura Team is the latest update to the brand’s lightweight, all-round road bike platform.
Dave Caudery / Our Media
  • Great value for a pro-level spec
  • Lively, exciting ride
  • Price: £8,000 / €9,999 (as tested)

The Merida Scultura Team took our 2022 Performance Bike of the Year crown, thanks to its superb, exciting ride and racy handling. It’s also great value, with a Shimano Dura-Ace 12-speed groupset, complete with power meter.

Merida has shaved 4.2 per cent from the previous Scultura’s drag numbers, while also lowering weight slightly to a claimed 822g for a size M frame. It’s well kitted out; we particularly liked the Vision Metron 45 SL wheels, their 1,372g weight leading to low inertia on climbs. They’re shod with 28mm Continental GP5000 tyres for a comfortable ride.

The one downside is the lack of narrower options for the integrated bar/stem.

Orbea Orca OMX M10i LTD D

4.5 out of 5 star rating
Overall, the OMX is a stunning machine.
David Caudery / Immediate Media
  • Excellent all-round ride and generous tyre clearance
  • Clean build with smart component integration
  • Price: £7,899 / $9,299 / €8,999 / AU$12,999 (as tested)

The Orca OMX has a wonderful blend of low weight, firm pedalling stiffness, decent aero credentials and confident handling that make it an absolute joy to ride.

We also really appreciated the care with which Orbea has integrated the cables. It makes for a beautifully clean front end, without any compromises in fit, and it’s not overly complicated to put together either.

Our test bike weighed 7.5kg (size large), complete with aero wheels. This doesn’t trouble the UCI weight limit, but with an 833g frame and 370g fork (claimed weights), it could certainly be built lighter, if you felt the need.

Orbea also offers the slightly cheaper Orca M25 Team-D.

  • Weight: 7.5kg (large)
  • Gearing: 50/34, 11-30

BMC Teammachine SLR 01 Two

4.0 out of 5 star rating
There’s very little to fault about the BMC Teammachine SLR 01 Two, but it’s very expensive.
  • Lightweight and faster than ever before
  • Very little to fault, but it comes at a high price
  • Price: £9,800 / $10,999 / €10,499 (as tested)

The latest iteration of BMC’s excellent Teammachine learns lessons from the Timemachine (BMC’s aero road bike) to improve its aerodynamic efficiency, without adding too much weight.

In fact, its 7.09kg weight makes the BMC Teammachine SLR 01 Two one of the lightest bikes on this list, and that’s seriously impressive considering it has aero wheels, disc brakes and plenty of other aero features.

The omission of a Dura-Ace crankset in favour of Rotor is perhaps the only minor criticism we could make of a bike that’s otherwise extremely hard to find fault with. There’s no denying it comes at a very high price though.

  • Weight: 7.09kg (56cm, including two bottle cages)
  • Gearing: 52/36, 11-30

Canyon Ultimate CF SL Disc 8.0 Di2 Aero

4.0 out of 5 star rating
Canyon must be applauded for the Ultimate and a specification that’s up there with superbikes.
David Caudery / Immediate Media
  • Lightweight and aero-optimised, but the sharp handling may not be for everyone
  • Excellent-value build
  • Price: £3,749 / €3,999 / AU$5,299 (as tested)

As always, Canyon provides an excellent-value, race-ready package, right out of the box.

Despite the lack of dropped seatstays, the back-end is still comfortable. So much so, in fact, that the sharp front-end handling initially feels a little out of step with the rear, but this is a race bike after all.

At a shade over 7.5kg, it’s lightweight for a bike of its size, which has disc brakes and aero wheels, and there are women’s-specific builds available too.

We’ve more recently ridden the latest Canyon Ultimate CFR at its launch. With an all-new frame, that bike weighs a claimed 6.3kg. Look out for a full review soon.

  • Weight: 7.54kg (large)
  • Gearing: 52/36, 11-30

Cervélo R5 Disc Force eTap AXS

4.0 out of 5 star rating
The Cervélo R5 is a classic road-racing bike in every sense of the word.
Dave Caudery / Our Media
  • Stiff, but not too stiff frameset
  • Spec includes a power meter
  • Price: £8,599 / €8,799 / $8,400 (as tested)

Cervélo claims a 703g frame weight for the latest R5 and, like all Cervélos, there’s an aero edge, with Squoval tube profiles and smooth frame edges, while internal hose routing saves a claimed 3W at 48km/h.

The SRAM Force AXS chainset comes with a power meter and the bike is equipped with Reserve 34/37mm carbon wheels, although they’re planned to be swapped out for Zipp ZR1 wheels from 2023. The 25mm Vittoria Corsa tyres measure around 29mm on the wide rims.

Cervélo has a reputation for stiff frames, but the latest R5 is slightly less stiff than its predecessor. The geometry is racy, leading to an agile, predictable ride, and the light weight and good power transfer make for sprightly climbing.

  • Weight: 7.4kg (56cm)
  • Gearing: 48/35, 10-33

Colnago C68

4.0 out of 5 star rating
Colnago C68 retains Colnago’s lugged construction but with a look much more like its V3R.
Russell Burton / Our Media
  • Beautifully built with comfortable one-piece cockpit
  • Superb, taut handling
  • Top-spec Dura-Ace groupset and wheels
  • Price: £11,753 / €14,065 / $15,772 (as tested)

Colnago uses its lugged construction on the C68, but the tube shapes are more reminiscent of the monocoque V3R. Colnago fits its own comfortable one-piece cockpit with hidden cable routing.

The ride position is long and low, although not too aggressive for less flexible riders and leads to great handling from the taut frame.

There’s a full Dura-Ace R9200 build, including C50 wheels with 28mm Pirelli tyres, although the Prologo saddle isn’t the range-topping carbon-railed version. It’s a great bike that merits its superbike rating.

Giant TCR Advanced Pro 2 Disc

4.0 out of 5 star rating
The Giant TCR has finally gone aero.
Simon Bromley / Immediate Media
  • Solid all-round spec with lively ride quality
  • Lots of tyre clearance
  • Price: £2,999 / €3,100 / $5,199 (as tested)

The legendary TCR has finally gone aero, but that doesn’t mean a huge increase in weight, fortunately.

At 7.87kg, it’s not the lightest bike on this list, but it’s very competitive in its price range and could likely be lightened considerably with some component upgrades.

It also offers a noticeably smooth ride, with confident handling and clearance for up to 32mm tyres, which is very welcome.

Giant’s sister company Liv offers a women’s-specific version called the Langma Advanced Pro Disc.

  • Weight: 7.87kg (medium/large)
  • Gearing: 52/36, 11-30

Scott Addict RC 10

4.0 out of 5 star rating
The Scott Addict RC has good adjustability despite the integrated cockpit.
Dave Caudery / Our Media
  • Quality ride with sharp handling and compliance
  • Spec includes a power meter
  • Middling wheels and mediocre tyres
  • Price: £5,949 / $8,000 / €6,599 (as tested)

The Scott Addict marries sharp handling with a predictable and compliant ride quality that’s similar to the Cervélo R5. There’s integrated cabling that works for mechanical and wired electronic, as well as wireless shifting, and it’s reasonably easy to work on.

Scott includes a power meter with the SRAM Force AXS electronic groupset and you get decent, if not outstanding, Syncros Capital 1.0 35 Disc wheels with a claimed weight of 1,574g a pair.

We were disappointed with the fitted Schwalbe One TLE tyres though, with their higher rolling resistance than many of the best road bike tyres. Tyre clearance is a little narrow at 28mm too.

Although this mid-spec Addict weighs just under 8kg, you can spend a lot more and get the bike’s claimed weight down to 6.7kg.

Specialized Aethos Comp

4.0 out of 5 star rating
The Aethos Comp feels fast on climbs, even if it doesn’t match the light weight of the flagship S-Works bike.
Russell Burton / Immediate Media
  • Little brother of the S-Works Aethos is still light and climbs well
  • Rapid handling, but stable ride quality
  • Price: £4,500 / $5,000 / €5,400 / AU$6,900 (as tested)

Although the Comp spec of the Specialized Aethos weighs over 8kg, the top spec S-Works Aethos brings that down to a claimed sub-6kg, definitely earning a place on our lightweight bikes list. The classic frame profile with round tubes goes against the aero-is-everything modern trend.

The Comp uses a lower-spec carbon than the S-Works, but still has a 700g frame weight and comes with a SRAM Rival AXS groupset and lower-priced, heavier wheels. These make it feel less skittish than the S-Works bike, while it retains its rapid handling and shares its geometry with the Tarmac SL7. It still feels light when climbing too.

Specialized S-Works Tarmac SL7

4.0 out of 5 star rating
The Specialized S-Works Tarmac SL7 with SRAM Red eTap AXS is a serious piece of kit.
Matthew Loveridge / Immediate Media
  • Flagship race bike as ridden by Peter Sagan
  • Stiff, fast and beautifully finished
  • Price: £10,500 / $12,000 / €11,499 / AU$18,000 (as tested)

Few bikes generate as much hype as the new Tarmac did when it launched in 2020.

This new flagship merged Specialized’s aero and lightweight platforms into one, claiming real aero gains over its predecessor and sporting a frameset weighing a claimed 800g for a 56cm.

The Tarmac SL7 is disc-only and has clearance for 32mm tyres. It’s a fast and uncompromising race bike that will delight riders who can kick out big power numbers.

In its halo S-Works spec, this is a seriously expensive bike, but more affordable models are available, with the second-tier frame claimed to weigh a respectable 920g.

Trek Emonda SL 6 Pro

4.0 out of 5 star rating
Trek says the 2021 Emonda was designed around the legendary Tour de France climb, Alpe d’Huez.
Felix Smith / Immediate Media
  • Stiff and exciting ride quality
  • Great-quality components
  • Price: £3,350 / $3,799 / €3,799 / AU$5,499 (as tested)

In line with market trends, Trek has amended the Emonda’s design parameters to encompass a broader, all-round riding style, with the obligatory disc brakes and aero optimisation.

This does mean builds won’t quite be able to match the positively feathery lows of previous models, but Trek is, unsurprisingly, adamant they are faster most of the time. Our tester broadly agrees with this sentiment too, heaping praise on the Emonda’s speed and stiffness.

It’s also worth considering Trek’s beautiful Emonda ALR. Not only are there rim and disc brake versions of that frame (as things stand), but it’s also substantially cheaper. We think it’s an absolute peach of a bike.

Trek says the Emonda is now a unisex bike, and offers a broad range of sizes (from 47cm to 65cm) with the intention of fitting all different kinds of cyclists.

  • Weight: 8.13kg (56cm)
  • Gearing: 52/36, 11-30

Vitus Vitesse EVO CRS Di2

4.0 out of 5 star rating
The Vitesse has a big spec for the money.
Matthew Loveridge / Immediate Media
  • Very competitive spec
  • Racy personality and low weight
  • Price: £3,699.99 / $4,499.99 / €4,199.99 / AU$6,399.99 (as tested)

The Vitesse has received a major update and is now a disc-only racer, one that’s ridden by pro cyclists. The frame weighs a claimed 910g and sports very up-to-date styling, with all cabling routed into the non-driveside.

More affordable builds than this are available, but even with Shimano Ultegra Di2 and low-profile Reynolds carbon clinchers as we tested it, it’s keenly priced.

The Vitesse is a firm and focused ride that will appeal to racers, but may be a little uncompromising for more casual riders.

What we’ve included (and what we haven’t)

This buyer’s guide features lightweight bikes at a range of prices, reviewed by BikeRadar and having scored at least four stars in our testing.

While lighter bikes may be available (including custom builds and different models within a given manufacturer’s range), these are bikes we have tried and tested, and can confidently vouch for as a result.

Buyer’s guide to climbing bikes

Carbon vs aluminium

We’ve explored this many times before, but with carbon fibre frames and parts still commanding a healthy premium over aluminium ones, it’s worth touching on here.

Top-quality carbon fibre is prized for its incredible stiffness-to-weight ratio, and rightly so – this is the reason it’s used in Formula One. If you can afford it, the lightest bikes and parts will almost always be made out of high-end carbon fibre.

At the lower end though, good aluminium is competitive with, or even better than, cheap carbon fibre. That applies not just to weight and stiffness, but also ride quality and strength.

Former BikeRadar staffer Joe Norledge built this 5.1kg aluminium bike for the 2016 British hill climb season.
Matt Grayson /

The very last of those characteristics is also a general worry for ultra-lightweight carbon fibre frames and parts, in general. You have to be very careful about sticking to recommended weight, torque and clamping specs, or else it’s very easy to break these feathery items.

Aero vs. weight for climbing

It would be easy to think when you’re going uphill, weight is the only thing that matters. It is, of course, important. After all, a 5kg reduction in total rider plus bike weight will shave around 39 seconds off a 2km, 10 per cent climb, all other things being equal.

But with our many years of collective experience, we’ve found body weight matters much more than bike weight. Besides, unless you can get your hands on something like Berk’s 3.9kg bike, you’re going to struggle to shave anywhere near 5kg off your bike’s overall weight, no matter how deep your pockets.

On top of that, more and more brands are discovering that aerodynamics is still important when riding uphill, and for saving energy on the way to the bottom.

Even a brand such as Cannondale, which used to make the definitive, ultra-lightweight hill climb bike, believes its full-on aero bike, the SystemSix, is faster on gradients up to 6 per cent than its own lightweight bike (the SuperSix) – even at the typically slower speeds mere mortals such as us ride at.

Cannondale says its burly SystemSix aero bike is its fastest bike on gradients of up to 6 per cent, regardless of the weight penalty.
Aoife Glass / Immediate Media co

True hill climb aficionados will no doubt be tearing their hair out at this point, exclaiming ‘anything under 10 per cent isn’t even a proper hill anyway!’, but if you want to go fast, aero always matters, regardless of the gradient.

It’s true that aerodynamic drag becomes a smaller part of the equation as gradients increase in severity, but the absolute amount of air resistance you experience remains the same for any given speed.

On top of that, the power to overcome any increase in air resistance is proportional to the cube of speed. So, if you want to ride your bicycle twice as fast, you’ll need eight times more power to overcome the extra drag force, unless you can reduce your aerodynamic drag.

In an ideal world, then, you want a bike that’s both lightweight and aero for smashing hills.

One of the first brands to use Kammtail tubes was Trek. It discovered that a cut-off airfoil shape retained some of the benefits of a full airfoil, but in a shape that was lighter, stiffer and fitted within UCI regulations.
James Huang/BikeRadar

“Weight weenies should be Crr weenies”

So said Robert Chung, Professor and Theoretical Mathematical Demographer at the University of California-Berkeley. Chung is perhaps most famous for devising the ‘Chung Method’ of calculating aerodynamic drag, but he also reminds us of the importance of not ignoring rolling resistance.

Using a power equation for wheeled vehicles (such as the one found at, he showed that even a relatively small difference in rolling resistance (Crr stands for ‘coefficient of rolling resistance’) can be worth as much as large changes in weight, even on steep gradients.

Chung’s graph plots the difference in Crr between Continental’s GP4000S II and GP5000 tyres in terms of the equivalent efficiency found through weight loss on different gradients.

On a flat road, it’s clear that even a relatively small decrease in rolling resistance is worth more than practically any increase in weight. What’s really interesting to note though, is that changing from a GP4000 to a GP5000 is still worth more than 500g of extra mass even on a 10 per cent slope.

Yes, that’s right; the small difference in rolling resistance between two excellent tyres can have a greater effect on your efficiency than 500g of extra weight even on a 10 per cent slope, and that equivalent mass penalty only increases as the gradient gets shallower. On a 6 per cent slope, the difference is equivalent to a kilogram of extra mass.

The key takeaway is that you shouldn’t just look at weight figures when shopping for tyres. The differences in rolling resistance between tyres will be worth far more to your climbing speed than any minor weight variations.

Gearing and cadence when climbing

Some riders apparently enjoy using singlespeed or even fixed-gear bikes for climbing hills. But most people are going to want gears.

For a long time though, back in the days when riders only had five or so cogs on their cassette to choose from, gears such as 42×21 were considered adequate for climbing mountains.

Thankfully, though, things have moved on and we now have access to compact/sub-compact chainsets, long-cage rear derailleurs and much larger cassettes. Used together, these can allow practically anyone to spin up steep climbs, rather than turning them into a series of leg presses.

Smaller gear ratios, like this sub-compact 52/36t Shimano 105 R7000 chainset, allow for higher cadences on steep hills.
Simon Bromley / Immediate Media

Muscling up a steep hill in a massive gear might feel heroic, but it’s probably slower and it’s costing you more energy too, as anyone with a power meter will be able to attest to. These days, even the pros know you need to gear down when the road goes up.

Rim or disc brakes

Another thorny issue. In our opinion, there are two answers to this; a simple one and a nuanced one.

The simple answer is that rim brakes are, generally, lighter, and therefore are better for climbing bikes.

The lightest rim brakes and wheels are still lighter than hydraulic disc brake systems, so many weight weenies prefer them.
Simon Bromley

There’s a more nuanced answer, however. While disc-brake equipped bikes generally come with a weight penalty (though this is becoming harder to measure because, despite what we wrote in 2017, new high-end rim brake bikes are becoming less common), the advantage of better braking will be keenly felt on the way down the hills.

If the only thing you care about is going uphill as fast as possible, then rim brakes could still be the right choice. Otherwise, the advantages of disc brakes in a more general sense might tip the balance.